A bad plan is a bad plan. Congress proposes legislation, not bush, and they should work on their own solution rather than basing it on another preplanned "Patriot Act". Can you find some economists without connection to Goldman-Sacks who support bush's bailout?
PDF link
http://solari.com/blog/docs/Final-Bailout-White-Paper.pdfProposed $700 Billion Bailout Is
Too Little, Too Late to End the Debt Crisis;
Too Much, Too Soon for the U.S. Bond MarketSubmitted by
Martin D. Weiss, Ph.D. and Michael D. LarsonWeiss Research, Inc.
to
United States Congress
Senate Banking Committee
and House Financial Services Committee
Executive SummaryNew data and analysis demonstrate that the proposal before Congress for a $700
billion financial industry bailout is too little, too late to end the massive U.S. debt
crisis; and, at the same time, too much, too soon for the U.S. Government bond
market where most of the funds would have to be raised.
I. Too Little, Too Late to End the Debt Crisis. Congress should
1. Disregard data based on the list of troubled banks maintained by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The FDIC’s list currently has 117
institutions with $78 billion in assets. However, based on a broader analysis of
recent FDIC call report data, we find that institutions at risk of failure include
1,479 FDIC member banks and 158 thrifts with total assets of $3.6 trillion, or
36 times the assets of banks on the FDIC’s list.
2. Think twice before providing a broad bailout for U.S. debts given the wide
diversity of mortgage holders and the great magnitude of the total debts
outstanding in the United States. Just-released Federal Reserve Flow of Funds
data show that, beyond mortgages, there are another $20.4 trillion in privatesector
consumer and corporate debts, plus $2.7 trillion in municipal securities
outstanding.
3. Recognize that, among banks and thrifts with $5 billion or more in assets, there
are 61 banks and 25 thrifts that are heavily exposed to nonperforming
mortgages.
4. Get a better handle on the enormous build-up of derivatives held by U.S.
commercial banks.
5. Base any legislation on (a) realistic estimates of the loan amounts already
delinquent or in default, and (b) reasonable forecasts of how many more are
likely to go bad in a continuing recession.
6. Recognize the inadequacies in already-established safety nets, such as the
FDIC for bank depositors, Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC)
for brokerage customers, and state guarantee associations for insurance
policyholders.
There should be no illusion that the $700 billion estimate proposed by the
Administration will be enough to end the debt crisis. It could very well be just a
drop in the bucket.
Weiss Research, Inc. 4
II. Too Much, Too Soon for the U.S. Bond Market. There should also be no
illusion that the market for U.S. government securities can absorb the additional
burden of a $700 billion bailout without putting dramatic upward pressure on U.S.
interest rates.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) projects the 2009 federal deficit
will rise to $482 billion. But adding the cost of announced and proposed bailouts,
now approximately $1 trillion, it is undeniable that the federal deficit could double
or triple in a short period of time, driving interest rates sharply higher and
aggravating the very debt crisis that the bailout plan seeks to alleviate.
III. Policy Recommendations to Congress1. Congress should limit and reduce the funds allocated to any bailout as much as
possible, focusing primarily on our recommendation #4 below.
2. If Congress is determined to provide substantial sums to a new government
agency to buy up bad private-sector debts, we recommend that the new agency pay
strictly fair market value for those debts, including a substantial discount that
reflects their poor liquidity.
3. Congress should clearly disclose to the public that there are significant risks in
the financial system that the government is not able to address.
4. Rather than protecting imprudent institutions and speculators, Congress should
protect prudent individuals and savers by strengthening existing safety nets,
including the FDIC for bank deposits, SIPC for brokerage accounts and state
guarantee associations that cover insurance policies.