Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Bailout Bill was a Roveian style setup of Democrats! ...Let me lay it out for you

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 07:45 AM
Original message
The Bailout Bill was a Roveian style setup of Democrats! ...Let me lay it out for you
WHAT HAPPENED:
Chinese banks stop lending to American banks.

Paulson informs the White House the Fed needs to inject $630B in liquidity into the credit market to offset the loss of Chinese short-term lending.

Paulson & the White House go to Congress asking for $700B because its a "very big number" wrapped up in a 3 page proposal that is obviously nothing more than a naked power grab.

The Democrats react, scurrying to "improve" the White House bill so as to offer protections and reduce the fascist aspects of the bill. They were totally sucked in at that point.

Meanwhile, the House Republicans sat quietly, feigning support for urgently needed action.

Then, it seems a deal has been worked out until, suddenly, McCain is brought in and the House Republicans seemingly "revolt". The RNC lockstep House Republicans who ALWAYS vote by directive suddenly are unruly? Riiight.

10 minutes BEFORE the House vote, Bernenke released $630B liquidity into the capital market revealing that the $700B Bailout Bill WAS NOT NEEDED!

Minutes later, Pelosi, obviously angry, uncharacteristically lashes out at the administration and the House Republicans from the House floor just before the floor vote. IMO, Pelosi knew in those minutes that she and the Democrats had been had. With all of the world watching, she had little left to do but deliver on her promise of 60% Democratic votes and rub the Republican noses in the shit that is our economic condition. So, she absolutely slammed the Republicans in that moment when she would otherwise have praised their bipartisanship. Uncharacteristic for Pelosi? YES! But this was the only way she could hope to kill the bailout bill at the last minute... and it worked, or at least the House Republicans "claimed" her speech killed the bill.

I don't believe Boehner ever "had the votes" to pass the bailout. I don't think Boehner ever intended to have the votes. I DO believe Boehner had exactly the votes he wanted and intended. This was a setup to drape the Democrats in an extremely unpopular $700B taxpayer bailout (polls showed 80% of the public was against this bailout). The "unelectable" Republicans and McCain became populist saviors of hard earned taxpayer money while being seen as at odds with this failed and unpopular administration.

Think about it:
1. This is the RNC run, Rove-style Republicans, folks.
2. THE $700B WASN'T NEEDED.
3. Pelosi would NEVER have delivered that speech otherwise.

WHAT NOW?
The Democrats need to unglove and rally around REAL financial market and banking reforms. My take on what's needed: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=4123458&mesg_id=4124942

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. And it was a document written by neocons
that should have been their first clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. and McGrumpy can decide what to do with wayward Repigs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonLP24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Plus Bush is on TV right now saying the economy is dependent on this
And since when has he been an expert on what is necessary for the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. That $630 billion the Fed put in
threw me for a loop also. That smells bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R I agree, it was a setup. I also agree with Dennis Kucinich,
that it was the "biggest transfer of wealth in the nations history"!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I stand with DK on this issue. He is right, as usual.
It is not a coincidence that we get Mr. Danger (B*sh) coming out of his cave before every election trying to scare the world. Happened in 2004, 2006 and now 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. Agreed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoSheep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. You think the way I think. How could anything out of jr's administration be anything
but a con game. Glad someone around here is "sensitive" enough to know when they're being shafted. I'm amazed at all the distress around here. "The sky is falling, the sky is falling"-this message brought to you by the administration who sold you the Iraq invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. I am still waiting to hear MSM mention the money the Fed put into the system.
Has anyone heard about it on the teevee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I've had the tv on all morning and haven't heard a thing. I'm sure I just missed it.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. Here's a link to two threads on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Thanks! I just saw the first one because it just went to the greatest.
Edited on Tue Sep-30-08 09:03 AM by MelissaB
I'm hoping Michael Moore, Raw Story, or Huffington Post with take the ball and run with this and make the msm cover it.

Edited to say: I'd also like to know if Pelosi knew this before the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. This is what the OP claims on this thread. That Nancy knew and she deliberately
blew it with the Repukes by talking about the Shrub administration failures, before the vote. Hence, a Rovian move. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. I wish someone would start a thread explaining this and demanding the msm cover it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. There is another thread where this was reported and I believe there were comments, let me look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. Okay, I'll bite. So why did Bernenke release the $630 billion
when he did?

Was it a mistake in the master plan? Or did it serve some other purpose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Locrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. terrorism
People dont realize what happens in disaster / shock capitalism is scary. And they easily panic as you can see.

Say there is an intruder with a knife at your loved ones throat. You have a gun on them - you DONT give them the fucking gun!!!


This bailout is the final take over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. A painful and necessary correction
Like many others onboard here, the market turmoil has cost my family dearly.
But the fact is, we were living in a bubble in WS.
The injection of the $700B bailout, IMO, would not prevent the market from eventually leveling out anyway.
The only legitimate "crisis" here was liquidity. Obviously, the liquidity situation has arisen from the irresponsible transfer of real money to the wealthy (check CEO salaries, WS bonuses, speculator profits, etc.) and the replacement of real money with paper (collateralized debt, credit swaps, you name it, etc.).
This had to be reconciled eventually, particularly with such a large part of it financed aboard.
So here we are.

The only right thing to do, IMO, is:
1) Hold the guilty accountable. Much of the vanquished real money has, in effect, been stolen. Even worse, much of this larceny has been officially sanctioned by our current government (deregulation, etc.). It's time for every citizen to understand this. If we can't arrest the theives, then at least let us vanquish these people from positions of responsibility - starting with Paulson.
2) Do not respond to Paulson or any of the current administration's alleged "fixes". Wait them out, and then rebuild our financial institutions the correct way.
3) Do consider an allocation of funds to set up a mortgage reconciliation mechanism which should be designed to prevent as many foreclosures as possible. This will only apply to people actually living in the homes, not speculators. This is costly and will essentially absolve irresponsible behavior on the part of some homeowners. But the horse has left that barn. By stabilizing the RE market, we can create a pathway for such owners to eventually sell and trade down.
4) Tell the story. Obama is not seizing a golden opportunity here to explain the real issues and take a firm stand on combating greed. Someone should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
12. What Bernake did does not replace a bailout.
Also, Chinese banks have denied the lending stop to US banks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'm sorry Kip, but I call BULLSHIT.
This was a miscalculation and failure of Democratic leadership every step of the way, starting on DAY ONE.

Crisis: Day One...what if Nancy & Harry had said:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4113135

There's a point where we have to stop letting them off the hook. In a few short months, Rove just isn't going to be a convenient excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Why is that, Rove's slimy effective politics will always be a strong influence with
Edited on Tue Sep-30-08 08:44 AM by LaPera
McCain and the republican party. (He's on board the McCain bus as it is now).

Dems should vote NO on this fucking corporate bail out...it's complete and total bullshit....The urgency is more Bush bullshit so the bill can't be rewritten to truly help out the people, as opposed to helping the corporations who depend on our tax dollars for their corporate socialism.

Call congress and tell them to vote NO and take the time to write a better bill and don't be bulldozed by Bush AGAIN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. The leadership of both parties were just doing business as usual.
Bailout follows the 10 normal principles for how our government functions

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4130717

I defy anybody to disprove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. But I agree the Democratic leadership failed miserably..."they were had"...
This "crisis", falling at the end of the quarter, was totally manufactured:

1. The SEC chairman can unilaterally rescind the mark to market reporting requirement as a stop gap, thereby forestalling 3rd Qtr bank margins collapsing. No Congressional intervention required.

2. The FED exercised its duly authorized power to inject the $630B into the credit market forestalling a credit liquidity freeze. No Congressional intervention required.

The Democratic leadership was totally suckered and desperately needs replacing with leadership that can understand the RNC and is unafraid and smart enough to go toe-to-toe with the Republicans instead of being played for fools all of the time. This is all out political warfare and the Democrats have a B-team leading them that doesn't have the grit to double down when they need to.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
23. Look, people, Rove isn't as smart as all that
This whole thing is a disaster for Bush and McCain. It all reflects on Bush's leadership and policies.

There is no upside for the Hose GOP killing it. While the public viscerally hates the notion of a Wall Street bailout, they also hat the ides of their banks failing or their pension plan turning up missing. There would be absolutely no upside for Rove doing something like this.

Please stop with all the Rove s zen master crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. Right
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC