Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Worst President in History?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 04:21 PM
Original message
The Worst President in History?
Edited on Tue Sep-23-08 04:25 PM by RedEarth
This article is from 2006, but after what has gone on over the last few weeks can there be any doubt at all that Bush has been worst president ever?



The Worst President in History?

One of America's leading historians assesses George W. Bush

SEAN WILENTZ
Posted Apr 21, 2006

George W. Bush's presidency appears headed for colossal historical disgrace. Barring a cataclysmic event on the order of the terrorist attacks of September 11th, after which the public might rally around the White House once again, there seems to be little the administration can do to avoid being ranked on the lowest tier of U.S. presidents. And that may be the best-case scenario. Many historians are now wondering whether Bush, in fact, will be remembered as the very worst president in all of American history.

From time to time, after hours, I kick back with my colleagues at Princeton to argue idly about which president really was the worst of them all. For years, these perennial debates have largely focused on the same handful of chief executives whom national polls of historians, from across the ideological and political spectrum, routinely cite as the bottom of the presidential barrel. Was the lousiest James Buchanan, who, confronted with Southern secession in 1860, dithered to a degree that, as his most recent biographer has said, probably amounted to disloyalty -- and who handed to his successor, Abraham Lincoln, a nation already torn asunder? Was it Lincoln's successor, Andrew Johnson, who actively sided with former Confederates and undermined Reconstruction? What about the amiably incompetent Warren G. Harding, whose administration was fabulously corrupt? Or, though he has his defenders, Herbert Hoover, who tried some reforms but remained imprisoned in his own outmoded individualist ethic and collapsed under the weight of the stock-market crash of 1929 and the Depression's onset? The younger historians always put in a word for Richard M. Nixon, the only American president forced to resign from office.

Now, though, George W. Bush is in serious contention for the title of worst ever. In early 2004, an informal survey of 415 historians conducted by the nonpartisan History News Network found that eighty-one percent considered the Bush administration a "failure." Among those who called Bush a success, many gave the president high marks only for his ability to mobilize public support and get Congress to go along with what one historian called the administration's "pursuit of disastrous policies." In fact, roughly one in ten of those who called Bush a success was being facetious, rating him only as the best president since Bill Clinton -- a category in which Bush is the only contestant.

http://www.rollingstone.com/news/profile/story/9961300/the_worst_president_in_history


HNN Poll: 61% of Historians Rate the Bush Presidency Worst

4-08

“As far as history goes and all of these quotes about people trying to guess what the history of the Bush administration is going to be, you know, I take great comfort in knowing that they don’t know what they are talking about, because history takes a long time for us to reach.”— George W. Bush, Fox News Sunday, Feb10, 2008

A Pew Research Center poll released last week found that the share of the American public that approves of President George W. Bush has dropped to a new low of 28 percent.

An unscientific poll of professional historians completed the same week produced results far worse for a president clinging to the hope that history will someday take a kinder view of his presidency than does contemporary public opinion.




In an informal survey of 109 professional historians conducted over a three-week period through the History News Network, 98.2 percent assessed the presidency of Mr. Bush to be a failure while 1.8 percent classified it as a success.



http://hnn.us/articles/48916.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think I still have that issue...I could not bear to throw away that cover pic...
Edited on Tue Sep-23-08 04:24 PM by BrklynLiberal
I should find it and frame it..

They should rerun the cover with an updated article...and put an exclamation point where they had the question mark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. A friend and I were discussing this today
He said he thought that Fuckface's history would make U. S. Grant look like a brilliant president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Debateable. Living memory sure however.
God knows how the likes of Taft would have stood up to today's scrutiny, but counting say from Truman and on? Not even close. Nixon was corrupt and paranoid, but by comparison his actual policies and legislative agenda were quite reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. what I said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Sadly, it will be a while
before rEagan's exaggerated image is allowed to fade - especially as if you are a REpublican who else could you even think of idolizing and extolling as a success? Given the antipathy towards Nixon which is as we both said deserved for personal failings not so much political ones, you'd have to go back to fricking Eisenhower to say "hey look what we did - vote for us again!" and even then you'd have to explain that whole McCarthyite crap he allowed to go on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. REPtile REPublican REPulsive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Yeah I do typos WELL. ;) NT
kljhkjh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Actually three reputations are growing with time.
and one is beginning to rust.

the rust bucket? Ronnie Ray-gun.

the three growing better with age?
Truman
Ike
Nixon

Yes, Nixon. Some of his domestic and foreign policies, especially compared to Reagan's, were quite good. EPA, Clean water, Clean Air, Social Security fix, SALT, China, and others actually helped the nation.

Let's ignore Kissinger, Argentina, Watergate and how he dealt with anti-war protests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BraneMatter Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not a doubt in my mind...
Bush wins, hands down.

He has fleeced the taxpayers for the benefit of the rich more than President in history.

He's a gangster scumbag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Not to mention, he's a mass murderer of thousands of innocent Iraqis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. There can be no question about it.











Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Esra Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nancy and her sock-puppet are made to look vaguely
competent by this wannabe cowboy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. There's some bad ones - Hoover, Harding, Nixon, but GW has got to win that distinction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curious one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. We need decades to recover form the past 7+ years. The future presidents will pay for this one's
mistakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC