Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are American women pursuing chess success and facing obstacles?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 12:08 PM
Original message
Are American women pursuing chess success and facing obstacles?
Edited on Sat Aug-23-08 12:11 PM by Boojatta
Are American women brain-washed by a superstructure of patriarchal ideology that is overlaid on top of legislation that permits a high percentage of one's income to be from stock options rather than wages?

Do women who do equal jobs receive equal stock options?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. But what does "chess" have to do with your question??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I think the OP must have stumbled upon a fact about chess and can't get over it
Women have played chess since chess has existed. There have been many good players - the best females ever
are the Polgar sisters, who have sometimes held their own with men.

It has been asked MANY times why there are not more great female players, and the most commonly cited answer
is that women do not, in general, have the same desire and drive to vanquish an opponent than do men. That doesn't mean
men are smarter, or are more cunning. It just means that some feel that women lack a killer instinct.

Chess at the highest levels is about creating very subtle advantages that translate into narrow victories, which tends
to create draws. I suspect that women are equally good at calculation, planning, and evaluating, but perhaps they tend to
choose lines that are not decisive?

It might also be an illusion: maybe women lag behind men in chess because there are not enough matches between men and women?
To get a GM rating, you have to beat other GMs. Maybe those chances don't come up often enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. yeah, very confusing thread title.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PfcHammer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. prolly means "chest success." yeah too many implants
we need more real breastses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I meant a particular game that is played on an 8 x 8 board of 64 squares
Edited on Sat Aug-23-08 12:41 PM by Boojatta
32 of which are white squares and 32 of which are black squares.

Link to a related thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. How come there are no WOMYN squares!!! Hey!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The focus is on color.
A king that spends time on black squares can get a reputation for being progressive. If there had been male and female squares instead of black and white squares, then perhaps the Democratic nomination contest outcome would have been different. For example, what if Senator John Edwards had played chess with his wife while discussing their relationship?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. In chess, the Queen is the most pwerful piece on the board!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boojatta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Powerful?
Edited on Sat Aug-23-08 01:27 PM by Boojatta
The game itself hinges on whether the king lives or dies. The Queen does the work. The king gets credit for not getting bumped off. However all of these considerations are symbolic and are unlikely to affect motivation or aptitude for the game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The King is feeble and useless, whereas the Queen has all the moves!
Generally, a player who sacrifices his/her Queen has already lost, unless he/she manages to exchange his faithful Pawn for a bee-heiress Queen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Sensible Donating Member (200 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. You have a screw loose................nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Actually, it's the pawn
Anybody who knows Chess knows that the pawn is the most important piece on the board. The pawn structure of any given game is almost always enough to determine who will be the winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. Don't worry, some day your prince will come.
Edited on Sat Aug-23-08 05:26 PM by TahitiNut
Doesn't Disney comfort all of us?? Let's all worship at the Diana altar. Let's fill our lives with how WONDERFUL Royalty is! Everyone knows the Prince and the Pauper ... it's better to be Prince. (Here, Prince! Nice dog.)

Let's just ignore the fact that Queen Elizabeth inherited wealth built on the backs of 'commonors' working and dying while the monarchs played. Let's all sing "Good King Winceslaus.." :puke:

Long live the King? Long live the Queen?

Nonsense. The Bolsheviks did one thing right!

Anyone that doesn't spit upon "monarchs" and adopts the memes of 'royalty' just doesn't fucking get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC