Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Aircraft Carriers Head For The Gulf (Kuwait News)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 04:35 PM
Original message
U.S. Aircraft Carriers Head For The Gulf (Kuwait News)
http://operationitch.wordpress.com/2008/08/08/us-aircraft-carriers-head-for-the-gulf/

Kuwait City, Kuwait (AHN) — Two additional U.S. Navy aircraft carriers are on their way to the Gulf and the Red Sea, according to Kuwait Times. Kuwait began finalizing its “emergency war plan” on being told the vessels were bound for the region.

The U.S. Navy will neither confirm nor deny that carriers are currently en route. U.S. Fifth Fleet Combined Maritime Command located in Bahrain said it could not comment because of what a spokesman termed “force-protection policy.”

While the Kuwaiti daily did not name the ships it believes are heading for the Middle East, The Media Line’s (TML) defense analyst said they could be the USS Theodore Roosevelt and the USS Ronald Reagan.

Within the last month, the Roosevelt completed an exercise along the U.S. east coast focusing on communication among navies of different countries. Since then, it has since been declared ready for operational duties.

The Reagan, currently with the Seventh Fleet, has just set sail from Japan.

The Seventh Fleet area of operation stretches from the East Coast of Africa to the International Date Line.

Meanwhile, the Arabic news agency Moheet reported at the end of July that an unnamed American destroyer, accompanied by two Israeli naval vessels traveled through the Suez Canal from the Mediterranean. A week earlier, a U.S. nuclear submarine accompanied by a destroyer and a supply ship moved into the Mediterranean, according to Moheet.
more...

Kuwait Bahrain UAE Quatar and Saudia Arabia starting to get prepared

They have been warned

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. well
this is a good time to do it. Theoretically, they could be maneuvering to put more pressure on Russia re: Georgia. But i don't think i'm that naive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. If there is going to be an aerial bombardment, they must move in offensive military units.
As far as I know, typically two aircraft carriers are on station either in the Persian Gulf or the Arabian Sea pretty much at all times. Adding two more would double the firepower in theater already, unless the existing two carriers are going to be relieved by the Reagan and the Roosevelt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. From what I'm getting there bringing everything in to guard
Quatar Kuwait UAE and Saudis

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Guard them from what? A pre-emptive Iranian assault? Sounds like a cover story.
If they want a war with Iran, they would need to come up with a good excuse to move in a lot of firepower without foreign intelligence agencies across the world suspecting the US is about to hit Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. it could be sanctions being implaced or support for a
Israel strike
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. We dont keep 2 carriers in the area.
Plenty of cites in some of my journals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
isentropic Donating Member (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow, that makes about...what, 70 we have there now?
(this comes up every time they rotate in and out)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Are they usually secretive when they're just rotating in & out??
We talked to one of our family members who is in the Navy wednesday, and he said all he could say was "I'm on the boat". He couldn't tell us where he was, where he was headed or what he was doing....


:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angleae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. It's difficult to move a 98000 ton ship secretly.
The official navy website even has major ship deploments

http://www.navy.mil/swf/index.asp
(right column bottom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. lol
how true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Your right Ghost there is more secrecy here
they are not allowed to say

their on a boat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Heres another one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. So true, Most times we dont even have 1 carrier in the Gulf.
Let alone 2 or more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. I thought August was a bad time to roll out a new product (war).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. Who cares? John Edwards had an affair 2 years ago.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. You have just made the biggest point
meanwhile the public is oblivious
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. Going in to cover the "Holy Land's" Ass when the shit hits the fans?
I don't trust these LIARS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. BREAKING: Iran will be attacked on September 6!
I'm series!!!! I have a trusted source inside the Pentagon who leaked this information to me. Well, that, and September 6 is my birthday so it makes sense. Karl Rove is deliberately trying to f**k up my birthday by attacking Iran on September 6.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angleae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. Have there been extra USAF fighters deployed?
If not, I tend to discount war rumors related to navy units only when air force units can be used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC