|
from Regent and Liberty Talibabdiss "universities", who infiltrated the government for the express and openly stated purpose of overturning the Constitution in order to form a theocracy? Undertaking a position for the express purpose of overthrowing the government or overturning the Constitution is the very definition of subversive action against the United States. Or so I thought, someone please correct me. And if so (and I do believe it's so),
(1) Why are these people still in government and (2) Why are they not in jail for subversive activity/sedition/or even treason? (3) Why is it that only Goodling has been caught in the spotlight while the other 300 or so roaches that we know about are still scurrying behind the walls?
This stinks to high heaven.
A domestic enemy is still an enemy and the late Falwell, Robertson, Dobson, with their crews and acolytes by their own open admission of their "holy mission" to overthrow the government and replace it with some weird theocracy by definition makes them a domestic enemy. The thought that they're walking around loose, and many of them still within the goverment, still attacking the Constitution and the rule of law I and all other veterans swore to protect, uphold and defend (against all enemies, foreign and domestic) makes my head want to explode. :grr:
Oh, by all means, please do put her young, narrow hind-end away. Far, far away from decent society. But make sure that other 300 or so seditious lot get thrown in, too. If they despise the Constitution so much that they would openly undertake to overthrow it, then I say fine, let them have no rights under it.
See how the like that search string.
|