Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Wall Street's laughing all the way to the bank

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Chimichurri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 10:23 AM
Original message
Wall Street's laughing all the way to the bank
The credit crisis really puts the free in free market. The freest market is supposed to be the United States, and the evidence in favour of that argument is mounting. It's just not what you think. Free, in this case, means a free ride for a select group of people. Wall Street never looked so good, or bad, depending on your perspective.

From early 2004 until mid-2007, the big Wall Street investment banks made $250-billion (U.S.) in profits. (That's Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch.) During the past year, they've written off $107-billion. Keep in mind as we follow the money that if you include smaller dealers and commercial banks, the profit number swells and the writeoffs are even bigger.

As fate would have it, the writedowns, mostly garbage subprime loans, equal almost perfectly the amount of money Washington will dole out in stimulus cheques to get the economy going again. The House of Representatives Speaker said last year that the stimulus package would create 500,000 jobs. She got the number more or less right, but it was actually a loss of jobs.

Meanwhile, recent figures show that of the money that's been mailed and spent, only a 10th has gone to new spending.

The rest of it has been consumed by inflation (that is, because prices have gone up, even if consumers take their money to the mall, they're not helping the economy much).

Inflation is partly a product of easy money or low interest rates. Why does the Federal Reserve keep interest rates low? To stimulate the economy, which is being ravaged by the housing recession. The housing recession, meanwhile, was fuelled by Wall Street's greed and recklessness, aided and abetted by the easy money and the fraudulence of builders, appraisers and mortgage brokers.

Back to Wall Street to start connecting the dots. According to the New York State Comptroller's Office, the big banks paid $33.2-billion in bonuses in 2007, down only slightly from 2006, an even more splendid year for subprime origination. During the past four years, bonuses closed in on $100-billion, not far off the writeoffs and the stimulus package.

Back to Washington, whose coffers are bare, meaning that $107-billion is borrowed money. Borrowed from whom? Savers, mostly foreign. Borrowed by whom? The taxpayer of course. So in effect, the stimulus package is simply a matter of the cash-strapped, highly indebted U.S. consumer borrowing to spend (or pay debts) to save the economy.

It's pretty clear what's happening. Ultimately, the people are borrowing to pay Wall Street bonuses. After all, these handsome rewards are based on the earnings of the banks, but they're not real earnings, since the assets that produced them are subsequently written off. the rest here

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. A short intermission for the Obama presidency, then the next act will be
Social Security!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. when they get to the bank they'll be shocked to find it's empty
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value--zero." ~ Voltaire

Ruin the entire system all in the name of money then try not to be surprised when you find that due to inflation, the money is worthless.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yup, that's why although both lenders and borrowers were irresponsible....
The borrowers were much more so, by my lights. The irresponsible lenders at least could bank (rimshot) on their dimwit white house puppet bailing them out. The irresponsible lenders could bank on no such thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Jan 23rd 2018, 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC