Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conyer issues a statement on Karl Rove after Rove's refusal yesterday

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 08:04 PM
Original message
Conyer issues a statement on Karl Rove after Rove's refusal yesterday
Edited on Wed Jul-16-08 08:44 PM by Ichingcarpenter






















Got ya!

Edited for link:
http://www.nothing.net/deult.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. *removes hook from mouth*
You reeled me in, you sumbitch.

:P

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. That was pretty stern. Ya think he meant it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well the statement left me wordless
I just didn't know what to say!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redirish28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think it is VERY true. I mean come on. Had this been Repugs going
after a Democrat and that Democrat's strategist refused to testify... What do you think would happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Its what he didn't say in that statement that
tells you everything you need to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redirish28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Exactly that's what I ment. sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Susan McDougal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_McDougal

Susan McDougal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Susan McDougal (born 1955 in Heidelberg, Germany) is one of the few people who served prison time as a result of the Whitewater controversy in the United States, though fifteen individuals were convicted of federal charges. She is most notorious for refusing to answer "three questions" for a grand jury about whether President Bill Clinton lied in his testimony during her Whitewater trial. Her refusal lead to 18 months jail time for contempt of court, which was most of her total 22 months of incarceration. McDougal received a full Presidential pardon from outgoing President Clinton in the final hours of his presidency in 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Ah, precedent. Thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. Typical politician...
the statement can be interpreted a lot of different ways...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. aw damn
you suck

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That was in the fifth paragraph in Conyer's statement
Due to copywrite laws I was only able to post the first three paragraphs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. Conyers is a wonderful person, but he does not have a lot of energy
and does not seem to put a lot of zeal into his work. He is very systematic, and he has a certain wisdom and lots of experience, but he just seems too passive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Oh, I disagree it showed a lot of Zeal in his statement


Just look at all the hard work that went into his statement!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. Crickets
are a chirping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. 55 days and counting since the subpoena was issued
On May 22, 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. I wuz "Ichingcarpenterrolled"
I'm so ashamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Conyer mentioned me in the fifth paragraph.
but due to copy write infringement I could only print
the first 3-4 paragraphs of Conyers statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. As was your due. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-16-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. k&r-- just as good as i expected! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. I kicked this to add Conyer's new addition to his first letter


























I think the 2nd page cleared up
what was missing on the 1st page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC