Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If not Ms. Pelosi ..... then who?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 01:32 PM
Original message
If not Ms. Pelosi ..... then who?
Your dream presidential candidate from the last primary cycle is not a good enough answer. Neither is someone who once made a loud, defiant statement that you agree with. Or even more than a few loud, defiant statements. That's easy to do when your home district sends you back time and again, even if you pick your nose and eat the boogers on live teevee the night before the election. Similarly, scratch anyone who doesn't have wide spread support and respect from her/his colleagues.

The Speaker has to **actually** be **able** to get shit done.

So ..... if not Pelosi, then who?

(For the non-thinkers and the binary thinkers ..... this is not a thread in support of Pelosi.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wexler.
Edited on Tue Jul-08-08 01:35 PM by gateley


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I concur. Boxer or Feingold in the Senate, but in the House...
Waxman? Conyers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yeah, I answered with Senators before it dawned on me that I was in the
wrong place. :7

I just feel Wexler is stronger than Waxman or Conyers. Based on nothing, really, except my impressions gathered over time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. How about this guy?...

He couldn't do any worse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Who's on your list, Husb2Sparkly? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm open
To be honest ..... no one leaps to mind. A few possibles, but no clear favorite. I see a real paucity of leadership.

I like Barney Frank, maybe. I don't like his politics, but I like the attitude/punaciousness of Rahm Emmanual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. And it's hard to know what one would do when one assumes the role.
So many of us were hopeful and excited when Pelosi became Speaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. I don't see Emanuel as a break from Pelosi, in fact he might be worse
eom

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. You *may* have missed my point.
I didn't choose him. I mentioned him. I mentioned part of him, actually. His pugnacious behavior. That, specifically, is what I admire about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpominville Donating Member (323 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wexler or Kucinich have the respect of the people
But Congress is too divided between the normal Dems and the conservatives "blue dogs" to be able to agree on someone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. Perhaps a potted plant to be consistent.
Cheaper to feed, easier to maintain, and accomplish the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. And just what has Ms. Pelosi gotten done? Other than keeping necessary things from getting done
and pushing the Bush Admin's agenda?

Kucinich would be head and shoulder above her in getting things done.

Otherwise, any of the Representative who have NOT folded (and that requirement excludes Waxman and Conyers, unfortunately) in the face of the Bush Aministration's obstruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. She's done what she's needed to do
to keep her complicity in the torture program hush hush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I think there are more requirements than simply 'not having folded'.
Expanding on what I said in the OP, the Speaker has to be able to get actual things actually done by actually getting the actual Members to actually follow an actual lead.

Simply not having voted a certain way is far short of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Who knows? If Kuncinich were in a position of power, he might get things done.
He has a lot of support among people who know who he is.

Unfortunately, not a lot of people do know who he is. I found that out during the primaries.

When they asked me who I was voting for and I answered Kuncinich, they'd say, "Who is that?" They had no clue.

And the news media did their darned best to make sure it stayed that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kucinich, Wexler, I'm sure there are others.
Getting things done starts with actually WANTING to get things done, and making some kind of effort to do so.

Put someone who has demonstrated commitment to accomplishing something in a position of power, and I'm betting he or she would accomplish something.

Start with someone who will actually leave a democratic agenda on the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. Anyone who supports the constitution of the United States
enough to defend it. All others are unfit for office. The dividing line between George Bush's Democrats and the ones that are opposed to his assault on your rights should be pretty easy to find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC