Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why hasn't there been any MAJOR scandals and corruption

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FarLeftRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 05:20 PM
Original message
Why hasn't there been any MAJOR scandals and corruption
amongst the Democratic Party in American history?

I am thinking of ones such as Credit Mobilier, Teapot Dome, Watergate, Iran-Contra, gee-dumbya's "terms"... etc.

Off the top of my head, only the minor, localized ones come to mind.

Is the Democratic Party that pure???

Just asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. No it is not
and you forget that one reason the dems were voted out of office were the real scandals

Did I mention a Congressman even ran from jail where he was serving for corruption not too long ago

It is just that dems believe a little more in open government
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If you mean the things that the Congressmen Wright and
Edited on Thu Jun-19-08 05:28 PM by FarLeftRage
Rostenkowski were involved in... well, don't you think they're minor, compared to today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. And others, but they were standard for the time
reality is that if this executive does not face the music though the dems just became accessories, or at least the leadership
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Aren't you forgetting that awful conduct that led Mr Clinton to face impeachment??
Edited on Thu Jun-19-08 05:34 PM by truedelphi
Funny, the Dems' scandals (like Kennedy and Gary Hart) involve sex. While the Republicans' scandals are sex with little boys and money, money, money!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well.... now, a private matter betweenst
2 consenting adults does not constitute a scandal... in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Not all
Tammany Hall in the 1900s was a Democratic political organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Having grown up in Chicago, I'd have to agree
Edited on Fri Jun-20-08 12:21 PM by truedelphi
My dad went through school with the Hon Richard Daley (The First)

He was constantly offered the chance to be the top accountant for Da Mayor's City.

Always turned down the opportunity. And eventually was able to show my mom exactly what he meant by the levels of duplicity needed to work in accounting under Da Mayor - at least one of the top people there went to jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. History may show that our current congress as part of a large scandal
Taking impeachment off the table, an overall impression of spinelessness, the 'do-nothing congress' and etc. hints at something bigger that is being kept from the general public. Whatever the truth is, it may be a scandal within our party equal to or larger than any of the ones you have used for comparisons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Exactly and this is something
a lot of folks still have their heads in the sand over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Depends on how you look at it...
Edited on Thu Jun-19-08 07:56 PM by ZombieHorde
My sister in-law said that even if Bush did lie, and that lie caused many many deaths, that lie would not be as bad as the blow-job Clinton got.

She feels that sex that she does not approve of is worse than murder.

She is a great person, but her sense of ethics is very different than mine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seasat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. The more conservative you are the more likely involvement in a financial scandal
It makes sense to me sense the folks more likely to bribe a politician are more likely to have large corporate interest in legislation. While not impossible, under the present day with much more media coverage, it's hard for a labor union or activist group to bribe a politician. It's easier for an exec at Exxon to funnel a bribe directly to a congress person through a lobbyist and those most favorable to them are likely to be Repub or conservative. The few Democrats, like James Trafficant, that were caught in bribery scandals were usually more conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. Right now complicit and corrupt Democrats are creating scandals
and displaying criminal behaviors that I believe will go down in history, that is if this fascist regime gaining a stronghold in this country allows history to be written.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Presidential election of 1960 is regarded as fraudulent by some historians
Edited on Fri Jun-20-08 12:55 PM by slackmaster
The city of Chicago has a long history of questionable activity perpetrated by Democratic machinery.

And there was the infamous Pendergast machine of Kansas City.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Pendergast

And there was Huey Long.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huey_Long

But never let little things like like that get in the way of a DU "Collective Vanity Post".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC