Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman Camp To Obama: Back Off

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:52 AM
Original message
Lieberman Camp To Obama: Back Off


http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/06/lieberman_camp_pushes_back_at.php

Lieberman Camp To Obama: Back Off
By Greg Sargent - June 10, 2008, 10:46AM


We've been keeping you abreast of the ongoing behind-the-scenes battle between Barack Obama and Joe Lieberman, who is fast emerging as the front man for John McCain's attacks on Obama as unfit to defend the country, and now there have been some key new developments.

Specifically, the Lieberman camp is hitting back at suggestions from the Obama camp that the Connecticut Senator has crossed the line in his assaults on his Illinois colleague.

As noted here the other day, Newsweek recently reported that Obama took Lieberman aside on the Senate floor and, according to an Obama adviser, rebuked him for his half-hearted denials of the bogus Obama-is-a-Muslim rumors. But now a Lieberman spokesperson is denying that version of events, saying it was "entirely false and fabricated."

Meanwhile, a nameless Lieberman aide told Mark Halperin the following:

"If the Obama campaign thinks they are going to intimidate Joe Lieberman with these sleazy tactics then they are sorely mistaken."

The "sleazy tactics" in question appear to be the Obama camp's leaking of details of their conversation. That the Lieberman camp is calling the Democratic nominee's campaign "sleazy" while Lieberman continues to hold plum committee seats in the majority is obviously untenable, though it remains to be seen whether anything can really be done about it in the short term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. obama to lieberman 'go cheney yourself'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. My message to Lieberman....


Fuck off!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well, Joe L. is an expert on sleazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Lieberman accusing someone of sleazy tactics?
The rabbit hole gets deeper and deeper.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. Pft!
Loserman and his toadies have a lot of nerve. Oh, the hypocrisy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. HawkeyeX to Lieberman - "Deadbeat Traitor"
That's how I think of Joe I. Lieberman.

Connecticut should already have had Ned Lamont for Senator, but Joe Lieberman took his ball away, and stomped home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wow Halperin is the conduit for this?? Who woulda thought????
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. I hate that hog-jowled fucker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim4319 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. Joe-mentum is now O-mentum
You better recognize!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. Joe, it's nothing personal. It's politics.
And get ready to r-r-r-r-r-r-r-rumblllllllllllllllllllllllllllle!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
11. Don't let up on them Sen Obama......they are obviously running scared. Love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
12. Obama called him on his shit and then told the voters.
Why should Obama stay quiet about his former mentor refusing to defend him against slanderous lies? Why should he NOT tell the rest of us how Lieberman operates?

Seems to me Lieberman is just pissed Obama stood up to him. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
13. Lieberman is incredibly powerful in the Senate right now
The democrats can't get anything done without his cooperation. The leadership has no choice but to buy him off with good comittee assignments. After November, the tables may be turned. If we can replace a few republicans (like Gordon Smith of Oregon) with democrats, Lieberman will be irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. There's a way to get around that, and Obama is using it.
The worse Lieberman looks to the public, the less effective he is as McSame's attack weasel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
14. Obama camp to Lieberman: Fuck Off

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Beat me to it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
15. Lieberman is a quisling, low-life, scum-sucking, Bush-enabling, rat's ass,
bloodsucking, disgusting, hateful leech.

He "caucuses with the Democrats" (as he states in his McCain endorsement, then kicks us in the stomach.

He's of very little use, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
16. Lieberman has a camp?
who knew?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. Translation: "How dare you reveal the horseshit I told you in private!"
Must be pretty embarrassing to have your pettiness revealed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. The real fun starts when Joe isnt the deciding vote anymore.
I can't wait for that moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. And that's exactly what Joe is desperately attempting to delay.
Anyone wonder why Lieberman is acting this way? He knows that he becomes utterly obsolete the second the Democrats don't need him anymore. We all despise him. His career is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. True, the Democrats can't do much until January
That's when it won't matter where Lieberman goes.

Meanwhile, I don't want to hear about who's fit to defend the country from a couple of dopes who still think invading Iraq was a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my2sense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
23. Don't let the suit fool
you Joe, Obama is going to put a foot in your arse with a smile. What a POS you are Joe. Can't wait till you get kicked to the curb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
24. LIEberman is a person without honor
To say Obama's forces were "sleazy" because they revealed the content of a conversation is laughable. At least what they reported was the truth--can Lieberman claim as much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Please add Class and Credibility to the Honor....He lacks um all.
in fact....Joe is an ASSHOLE of gigantic proportions...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
26. I want to be there when Quisling Joe is escorted to his new office
in a converted janitorial closet in the Hart Building's service area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
27. Lieberman has a "camp"?
I thought he was an independent Senator with no aspirations.

Is he actually running for something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Green Mountain Dem Donating Member (784 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
28. After watching the Senate on C-Span today.....
I don't think it matters if we lose the majority!!! If we go back to a minority we could use the 60 vote filibuster more effectively than they can right now. Let Joe cross the aisle, and give up his chairmanships, to become the RW talking head for McCain. The repugs could never get even close to 60 votes in trying to pass anything including judicial nominees. Let McConnell take the heat for a failed Senate and we will get even more Dems in the Senate in November.

Right now we are not doing very well as the majority party and we are being blamed for being a "do nothing" party. What do we have to lose?
Let the repugs introduce whatevr they want..nothing will pass and they will be exposed for what they are, corporate lapdogs to Energy and Pharma!

Fuck You Joe...GET OUT NOW !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. wrong imo...if they win the majority they will change the rules and throw out the 60 vote requiremen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Green Mountain Dem Donating Member (784 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. I don't think so....
That would require a 2/3 vote and they don't have them! Could be wrong on this but keep in mind that I'm on my 8th Sam Adams Summer Ale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
29. Sounds like you're intimidated to me Joe...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
31. I guess Obama hit a nerve with Lieberman
good for you Obama, keep hitting those nerves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
32. I don't think I despise anyone as much as I do Lieberman...
I can't help but think of all of those -- even on this board -- who supported that turncoat so vehemently back in 2006. I bet they're eating crow now. I wish they'd fess up and admit how wrong they were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC