Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge critical of Gitmo trials is dismissed.»

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 02:33 PM
Original message
Judge critical of Gitmo trials is dismissed.»
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/05/31/judge-critical-of-gitmo-trials-is-dismissed/

Judge critical of Gitmo trials is dismissed.»

Army Col. Peter Brownback III, a judge who was hearing a war crimes case at Guantanamo Bay and “publicly expressed frustration with military prosecutors’ refusal to give evidence to the defense,” has been dismissed. Brownback had threatened to suspend the proceedings against Omar Khadr “unless prosecutors handed over Khadr’s medical and interrogation records since his July 2002 capture in Afghanistan.” Pentagon prosecutors have also rushed to schedule high-profile detainee trials during the height of the presidential campaign season.

***************************************************

9/11 trial sought during presidential campaign

By CAROL ROSENBERG
ASSOCIATED PRESS


Defense lawyers for the alleged 9/11 conspirators on Thursday accused the Pentagon prosecutor of rushing to begin the complex Sept. 11, 2001, mass-murder trial in the height of the presidential campaign season.

The U.S. military attorneys included the claim in a 20-page brief asking the military judge to dismiss the capital charges against alleged al Qaeda kingpin Khalid Sheik Mohammed and four other Guantánamo detainees.

The document includes an e-mail from a civilian member of the prosecution team proposing to set the trial date for Sept. 15, the Monday after the seventh anniversary of the suicide attacks.

''Not coincidentally,'' the defense attorneys say, ``that would force the trial of this case in mid-September, some seven weeks before the general elections.''

The date, in fact, is 10 days after Sen. John McCain, an architect of Military Commissions law, is expected to be officially nominated as the Republican presidential candidate at the GOP national convention in St. Paul, Minn.

more...

http://www.miamiherald.com/guantanamo/story/551287.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BunkerHill24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hard to run a kangaroo court with human beings sitting on the bench
Seeya, Judge Brownback. We can't be having "due process" or "rights against self-incrimination" or any of that fancy legal folderol. We're interested in convictions.

Ah, these military tribunals will convince the world just how much the United States respects human rights and its own Constitution. And the military is chock full of promotion-hungry assholes who will sell the country and its principles down the river for another ribbon on their chest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Bravo!!! Boy oh boy, did you knock that one out of the park.
Do they really think it's in anyone's best interest to be so damn ham-handed and transparent in hijacking everything the U.S. is supposed to stand for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. You mean we STILL haven't convicted the 9/11 terrorists?!?
6 and a half years certainly doesn't sound like a 'speedy trial' to me.

But yeah it's disgusting to see them try to hold back the case until around election time for political gain. What are they going to do, try to 'coincidentally' come back with a guilty verdict just a few days before the election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-31-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. So called "Evidence" elicited by Torture is bogus & Illegal.
The Military & the Busholini Regime have shamed America & have lost
credibility around the World.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 15th 2024, 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC