Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It doesn't matter how stupid the attacks are--they're playing a game of WORD ASSOCIATION

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:10 PM
Original message
It doesn't matter how stupid the attacks are--they're playing a game of WORD ASSOCIATION
All they're trying to do is sow the seeds in the public's barely attentive minds. They know that people as a whole can't follow complex narratives, and can't understand nuance. All they need to do is form an imprint in people's minds, based on association.

So the more the media replays these stories, the more the word association sinks in. It doesn't matter whether they're cast in a negative or a positive light. All that matters is that they're REPEATED. You have to use REPETITION to catapult the propaganda.

So let's play a word association game. Who or what do you associate with the following?

Madrassa
High energy bill
Looters
Flip-flop
Yaaaaaaaargh!
Cut 'n' run
San Francisco values
Smoker
Shrill
Chocolate city
F*****


Bonus: every time a court makes a ruling against a conservative ideal, what kind of judge must have made the ruling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Years ago GOP once slurred a Democrat by saying that he had a sister
who was a known "thespian" in New York. You are right on in your analysis. They are seeding the Dem candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. ADULTERER...Rudi Guiliani....oh, and Newt Gingrich....
ABORTION SUPPORTER...John McCain...who else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. The self-proclaimed "Party of the Big Tent" is actually
"The Party of the Big Lie."

When I was growing up, a family friend running in a Republican primary was successfully smeared by a whispering campaign saying that he was "a known entrepreneur," who had a history of leading Boy Scout troop in the city from which he had come. This was in the 1950s. The Big Lie been going on for a long time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. BINGO
how the right frames the debate 101

Oh sorry, according to some by you pointing this on a political board no less, you are pushing the talking points

Anyhow the question is... how do you get around it?

On a local level, talk to neighbors and friends, and try to short circuit the cycle

On a national level push for legislation making these practices beyond questionable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. An ACTIVIST judge....
not one of those strict Constitutionalist Judges the GOPers are always crowing about: the strict Constitutionalist Judges that ignore the Constitution to allow the rabid-right unparalleled and illegal power within our country.

Did I get the bonus question right? What do I win? ;) Please tell me it's a free kick to Karl Rove's nut-sack. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poverlay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Let's start framing the judge debate as that we want "common sense" judges and not
strict "Jail for jaywalkers and freedom for rapists"-constructionists...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. It is! I hope you brought your steel toed cleats! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondie58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. and lets not forget
their constant "slip" of Osama, instead of Obama- trying to make his name negative. Oh, but of course, it was always just a slip of the tongue,never deliberate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
Iraq
IRAN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greybnk48 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. This one was dispicable and it was never repeated
to my knowledge. When John Kerry was running someone went on hardball or one of those screaming head shows shortly after Kerry had prostate surgery and the Senator-R/hitman kept repeating that Kerry's plan for Iraq was "impotent." Whoever it was (sorry I can't remember the Repug Senator who was sent out to do the hit-job), was using the word-association tactic to plant a negative seed about Kerry. I don't recall ever being so repulsed or Po'd (well maybe by some of the attacks on the Clintons, whom I like).

Framing and word association are very important tools in a world where info is delivered in sound-bites rather than sustained reasoned arguments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-04-07 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Straight out of Newt Gingrich's playbook 'Dictionary." Remember that?
Edited on Sun Mar-04-07 07:13 PM by in_cog_ni_to
They always use that tactic and the media plays so well, don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-05-07 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. It's just as effective when the story is repeated as a retraction, or a condemnation of whoever said
it in the first place.

Take the Madrassa thing. Or even the Obama/Osama "accidental typos" that our cable news buddies pulled off. There's the first wave that happens when they do it. Then the word association is reinforced during the 50 million times they run the story about the "mistake" or the controversial statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC