Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Rude Pundit: Scott McClellan Confesses for His Damned Soul (and Lots of Cash)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:38 AM
Original message
The Rude Pundit: Scott McClellan Confesses for His Damned Soul (and Lots of Cash)
The Rude Pundit has always had great admiration for those who easily offer forgiveness for mortal offenses: the father of a murder victim accepting the apology of the killer, the elderly woman in the hospital granting pardon to the man who broke her arm snatching her purse, the scarred victim of a terrorist explosion wishing peace to the family of the suicide bomber. For, indeed, one of the true gifts of the teachings of the biblical Christ is the capacity to forgive those who commit heinous acts. It is, perhaps, the only way to stay sane in this world. But, still, it is not the path most of us actually have the tenacity to take.

While the Rude Pundit nurses few or no grudges in his daily life, there are times, yes, there are times when someone asks for forgiveness that he says, simply, even plaintively, "Oh, no. Never." For instance, now that former Bush administration press secretary Scott McClellan has spilled his guts for a big advance and a chance to up his speaking engagement fees, there is an implicit begging for absolution like a child molesting priest at the feet of an eye-rolling bishop ("Oh, fuck, not again").

What's been revealed so far from McClellan's book will be greeted by anyone paying attention for the last few years with, "Yeah, what else ya got?" The administration launched a propaganda campaign to sell the war? The not-really-liberal-at-all media didn't do its job in the run-up to the war or after? "The Iraq war was not necessary"? Rove and Libby lied about the outing of Valeria Plame? Bush was a complete dunderhead when it came to Hurricane Katrina? Really, Scotty? At this point, is there still wool that needs to be pulled from someone's eyes? We're all about ten steps ahead of McClellan by now. Jesus, at least give us something new, like, say, Cheney threatening to have Libby's cats gutted if Scooter didn't take the fall.

The Rude Pundit ain't in a forgiving mood when it comes to lackeys and co-conspirators in the Bush administration. McClellan doesn't get to say, as he does in the book, "The collapse of the administration’s rationales for war, which became apparent months after our invasion, should never have come as such a surprise." Not when he said, in late January 2004, months after the invasion, regarding the chimeric weapons of mass destruction, "Yes, we believe he had them, and yes, we believe they will be found. We believe the truth will come out." No, the little bulldog bitch who every day snarled at the press, even when caught in outright lies, does not get the bounty of fulsome forgiveness.

Hopefully, the book will tank, and McClellan will be reduced to blowing Hannity for nickels. Screw this obsequious pig-fucking son of a bitch, this grubby little man-whore, attempting to purge his soul of the taint and stench of death and sorrow while pulling in a buck or two. He's not honorable enough to have fallen on his sword, rhetorically or literally. And he's not even loyal enough to have shut the fuck up (at least an admirable quality in the abstract). He deserves a room in Hell lined with televisions playing his sneering statements of complicity on an endless loop while he's forced to sit on a couch made of the bloated corpses of Katrina victims. Way too little, way, way too late, you miserable bucket of spooge.

And, don't worry, Scott: you can bet Karl Rove's Sodomizin' Stormtroopers will be knocking down your door some time soon, ready to put your bloody, reamed ass on display on Fox "news" for all to point at and nod while you just wonder when your reward's coming.

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh Good - So Let's Throw Scotty Under The Bus To Help *Co.......
sweep this one under the rug too.

Don't you see that by discrediting Scotty - we're helping *Co. We are falling into their trap. We're and the MSM is still being complicit with *Co.

Instead - we should be making as big a story about Scotty's book and his revelations as we've made here on DU about the Clinton/Obama primary.

But no - it's more important for us to do damage to the Dem party than to be disloyal to *Co.

I just can't believe how many on this board are dissing Scotty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. i can't believe you can't believe it
scotty is a lying sack of shit. you have a point about using the book, but i get no warm and fuzzy feeling about the source. every day he was press secretary he got up there and he lied and he lied and he knew he was lying and still he lied. he does not deserve credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Dissing scotty? You have got to be fucking kidding me
Edited on Wed May-28-08 11:31 AM by no limit
this is the guy that was complicit in all of this. He knew back then what he was doing and didn't come public until now, when he can make a few million off "redemption".

You can't possibly be that naive. Fuck him and fuck anyone that tries to defend him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. I don't see it as discrediting so much as saying "Well, duh."
Scotty doesn't get a pass and a pat on the back for telling the truth NOW, when it hardly matters anymore because virtually everyone knows the truth. Telling the truth NOW doesn't bring back the 4000+ men and women who are dead because of those lies. He knew the truth, and should've told it THEN, when it mattered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. so, are you going to stalk every thread and defend the bastard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I Guess So Because I'm Happy That This Info Is Coming Out In Such A .......
vocal way in the press. Hopefully - some in the press will see the sins of their past and will be shamed enough to begin to question and report to the American people what was really going on and still is and prevent * from doing the same again with Iran.

I'm upset that he could have come out sooner and prevented more of our troops from being killed - maybe. But I think they could have made him look like more of a disgruntled employee back then and discredited him easier and got the MSM go along with that.

I wondering if people don't hold the fact against him that he is going to make some money on this book versus the fact that he was deep inside the WH and is finally questioning their motives and exposing them.

I think that what he has done now still takes courage. After all he still has to deal with the BFEE - and they don't like disloyalty - whether it would have come back when he was the PS or now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Bravo.
Edited on Wed May-28-08 10:55 AM by Mike Daniels
McClellan doesn't deserve any credit or huzzahs for his book. The book is a naked money grab by someone who was directly involved in the manipulation practiced by the White House.

Coming clean now with old information doesn't absolve him from what he did nor does it make him a hero.

McClellan didn't leave the WH because of some fundamental disagreement with the admin or because his conscience was bothering him. He was shown out the door for sub-par performance (quite an achievement in this admin where incompetence seems to get rewarded).

If you think McClellan would have still released this book if the economy was good, everything in the Middle East was relatively hunky-dory and if he could have found a job working within the Republican machine you need to lay off the weed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. Scotty is not seeking absolution just for himself
He's seeking it for his former boss and his cohorts in this maladministration as well. Scotty's their backdoor, their way of taking a tiny bit of responsibility while not taking any at all. It's the closest thing that we'll get to the Bush administration taking responsibility for the Iraq fiasco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. And he gets to make a few million in the process
I'm sure that has nothing to do with it.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Precisely
If Scotty wants to prove he has a pair then he can answer his Congressional subpoena and tell them what he knows -- UNDER OATH. Otherwise he's just another sniveling traitor for Bush** with his hand out. I spit on these bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. damn that was good
i'm gonna have to start reading this rude pundit dude or dudette
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. McClellan was an insider. He is providing real information about
the corruption of the Bush administration. Nothing else about McClellan or his motives matter at all.
What is the point of excoriating him? That only serves to weaken the impact of his revelations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
callous taoboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. O.K. Some good may come from Scotty's latest effort
but what a dirty, stinking little co-conspiring weasel he is. He lies for his boss, many people die, he gets to write a book about the lies and collect a nice check. Despicable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. Perfect
Bravo!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
14. Hey! McClellan knows slamdunk Tenet made $ome ca$h on his book so
he may as well use this opportune moment to come out with the book while the timing is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC