Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Not) Keeping Up with Our Parents: Just Being Middle Class Is Becoming out of Reach

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:36 AM
Original message
(Not) Keeping Up with Our Parents: Just Being Middle Class Is Becoming out of Reach
via AlterNet:



(Not) Keeping Up with Our Parents: Just Being Middle Class Is Becoming out of Reach

By Nan Mooney, Beacon Press. Posted May 20, 2008.

Why does it take two incomes to support a middle-class lifestyle that used to require one?



The following is an excerpt from "(Not) Keeping Up with Our Parents" by Nan Mooney (Beacon, 2007).

Since the 1950s, what we've considered the American experience -- be it sock-hopping, suburban living, or SUV buying -- has been largely dictated by the professional middle class. In her 1989 social critique, Fear of Falling: The Inner Life of the Middle Class, Barbara Ehrenreich defined this mainstream population in terms of education, occupation, lifestyle and tastes, but also in terms of income. "Middle class couples," she wrote, "earn enough for home ownership in a neighborhood inhabited by other members of their class; college educations for the children; and such enriching experiences as vacation trips, psychotherapy, fitness training, summer camp and the consumption of 'culture' in various forms."

This thriving middle class didn't develop by accident. It emerged with the introduction of government and social policies designed to lift the country out of the Great Depression and sustain economic health in the postwar era. By the 1950s, a combination of social programs including Social Security, unemployment insurance, the GI Bill, and federal housing loans helped middle class salaries stretch. Employers supplied health insurance and pensions. A surge in suburban building made housing widely accessible. You no longer had to be a doctor or a businessman to afford a two-story Colonial with a dishwasher and a color TV. For a white male supporting a family -- the typical middle class profile at the time -- it was possible to work in an array of professions whereby you didn't necessarily get rich, but you could count on being fairly comfortable. A house, a job, a car or two in the garage, a fun summer vacation, these were absolute indicators of middle class success.

Economic realities have undergone seismic shifts since our parents' and grandparents' generations. Education and housing cost more. Incomes have leveled off for all but a small minority. Employers and the government supply few social safety nets, cutting health insurance and pensions and replacing them with new "benefits" like 401(k)s and health savings plans that benefit only those with income to set aside. But many of those middle class expectations set in place back in the '50s still hold.

Alongside our schooling in philosophy and economics, today's college-educated professionals have been conditioned to see ourselves as among the financially stable, mainstream haves. Many of us attended what are considered strong academic institutions. Others come from families with comfortable financial backgrounds. Our childhood friends, our college roommates, the couple we met at that holiday party are those same lawyers and financiers who've hit the financial jackpot, driving multiple Mercedeses and buying $2 million starter homes. We know we aren't like them. We've aspired to different career and financial goals, those more rooted in education, the arts or public service. But, given our often-similar backgrounds and educations, it's clear we aren't entirely unlike them either. This rising and dramatic economic inequality among college-educated professionals, leaving so many of us to struggle while a select few enter the strata of the "super rich," was not supposed to be part of the package.

When we read about the middle class squeeze, we tend to think blue collar -- the machinist who used to make $25 an hour now making $15, the vocationally trained worker whose job just got cut. But what about the social worker who makes $30,000 a year, the environmental scientist who makes $40,000, the college professor who makes $50,000? The rules of the game have changed. The educated professional middle class experience no longer guarantees two cars in every driveway, or even the driveway itself. Instead we face relatively low-paying jobs in fields requiring a high-cost education, increasing mortgages, student-loan and credit card debt, less employer or government help with health care, retirement, education and child care, and an overall higher cost of living. As the gap between the rich and the middle class widens, a huge segment of that once-comfortable center section is finding that reality means plummeting financial and emotional security and lack of control over our lives.

Difficult times

Diana, 36, is a licensed psychologist with a PhD in clinical psychology. She splits her four-day workweek between two jobs: maintaining her own private practice and working as an assessment director for a nonprofit where she supervises and helps place school counselors. Though her income varies, she typically earns about $35,000 a year. Her husband, Byron, who has a BA in engineering, makes $40,000 as a technical writer for a patent attorney. They're both contract workers, getting paid on a per-project or per-client basis, so the size of their paychecks fluctuates from month to month. On months when the money coming in doesn't stretch quite far enough, they turn to credit cards to pay bills and buy groceries. They're currently carrying $17,000 in credit card debt. .......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/workplace/85858/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for Posting n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. This book is on order at my local library and I've requested it.

One reason that it take two incomes to support a middle-class lifestyle that used to require one is that the bar has been raised for what is considered a middle-class lifestyle. Houses built in recent years are, on average, MUCH larger than the average house of a few decades ago. People have more vehicles per family. People have more "stuff" and expect more stuff. Instead of wearing hand-me-downs from siblings or cousins, kids want brand-name clothes. Many high school students have cars nowadays; when I was in high school, that was rare. Kids go to their high school proms in rented limos. That was unheard of decades ago.

Now, I realize that medical care, education, and housing, have gone up WAY more than the official inflation stats. Those higher costs are one reason for the two incomes, but they're not the whole story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Productivity is up, wages are down
Palast did some about this in Armed Madhouse. The productivity of the average worker is up by 30-40% since the sixties but the real value of their wages has dropped by around 15% (and far more in some sectors). Our parents were working hard, we're working like slaves, getting less wages and less benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. "productivity" numbers are reported AS IF they are something to crow about -- they aren't...
they tell the story of one person doing the job of a 5- or 3-person department that has been eliminated.

i cringe whenever i hear about our "excellent" productivity in the US. it's bullSHIT. i've been that last person standing, and it's not f'in productive at all, except on the "balance sheet." in reality, you can't do the work of 4 people. you cut and paste. you replicate. you don't DARE do anything creative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. example: a nurse doing the job of 3 -- "productivity" numbers don't show the deaths/staph infections
teachers with double classrooms.
EMTs with double shifts.
retail stores with NO clerks.
software co's contracting developers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Progressive_In_NC Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. Plus, State Local and Federal taxes are up to about 35% of income when added all together
Especially here in Raleigh, NC.

I don't mind paying them, but last year I paid:
21% federal
8.5% state
5% property, sales, gas, car etc.


We are a family of four making around 90K a year. We don't hurt, but there isn't a lot left over after we pay all of our taxes and bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. The RW has framed anything other than laissez-faire economics as illogical
even though laissez-faire economics are producing negative results for the vast majority of people.

Then we stand around and argue about which "free trader" is more "progessive". Here's a hint: if you think medical care, shelter, food, education, psychiatric care, and other vital services should be rationed based on ability to pay, you are a phony "progressive"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's Giving Rise to a New *Official* Social Class-Based on Profession - Genteel Poverty
Edited on Tue May-20-08 09:21 AM by Crisco
If you frequent urban planning discussion forums, you'll see people talk about "affordable housing" for working class professionals - teachers, policemen, firefighters. People who are "the right sort" and needed for their services, but only make the national average salary or right around it.

If you live in a large city, you have the choice of purchase a home in a high crime area or paying 1/2 your salary in housing costs. You can rent in some nicer, suburban area but you'll never build wealth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. My wife and I were middle class and upper middle class
but we live in a 1920's row house, the only home we have owned and we were lucky to get it. We have 2 cars, both over 8 years old. My wife is on disability from her work as a social worker, and I recently retired from civil service because I had 2 heart attacks.
we have little by most American standards, but we own our home and have few major outstanding bills.

We were never even close to our parents style of living, and won't be, but we both have had periods of great poverty in our lives and are very happy with what we have.We enjoy just spending time together, and being at home, seldom travel or vacation.

I know few people my age (60) who are as well off as their parents were, many who are realizing they will never be able to retire at all.

mark

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. would love suggestions for good urban planning forums...
was an urban studies grad student, and am thinking about going back and finishing the degree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. she was on OnPoint yesterday -- there's an archive of the interview -- it's wonderful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks for posting
My wife and I talk about this all the time. We've played by the rules and done everything we were told would lead us to that American Dream. It's all a lie. Our lot in life is to serve our corporate masters and to pay 2 dollars to our banks for every 1 dollar we apply to a purchase. All we do is spend money on essentials, and we have to juggle just to do that.

The whole American system is now set up to make us all indentured servants.

Hency my name.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Best post on this thread! The American Dream is a LIE!
:thumbsup:

Yep-We have been set up to serve our corporate masters! Now that's the damn truth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. I don't see how young people can afford basic things like gas
In the late 1960s when I was in my teens and driving my first car, gas was around 29 cents a gallon. Part-time work didn't pay as much as it does now, but it seemed to pay for all of the basic necessities. The minimum wage was about $1.60 an hour, if I recall. That would buy you more than 5 gallons of gas for an hour of work. Will one hour of minimum wage work for a student in a part-time job buy 5 gallons of gas today? I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LucyParsons Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. We can't.
We also can't afford to buy homes or have kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taught_me_patience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
21. Most young people don't make minimum wage.
and gas is a very small portion of total consumption. Gas consumption is an average of 6% of the average household income. Affording gas is not an issue for almost any young person I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. I don't know if "average household income" is the proper standard
The average will factor in the baby boomers who are more numerous than any other group and established. I'm talking about young kids in high school or their early years of college who are working part-time and have to pay their way for a lot of necessities. I can't speak for the new generation of young Americans in their teens or early twenties, but when I was a kid, they were making minimum wage or less in their part-time work. I haven't heard of many part-time student jobs that pay that well, but maybe I don't get out much. Anyway, the fact that minimum wage buys you much less today than it did in the late 1960s is a certainty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. there is no middle class (or soon won't be)
except for a small exclusive population of professionals and technocrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taught_me_patience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'm way better off then my parents were at my age
I moved to a big city with opportunity. It takes hard work, dedication, a commitment to constant learning to excel in this economy. You must be willing to make the sacrifices necessary to succeed, which often means moving to areas of the country were there are opportunities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadiationTherapy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. OHHH...SACRIFICES. Ok...Succeed. Hmmm.
Hard work, dedication and a commitment to learning?

Why didn't anyone ever tell me this before!?!?

I am so fortunate to have come across your post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taught_me_patience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Why such a cynical reply?
Do you disagree that what I said is a minimum requirement for success for most people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadiationTherapy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I don't know, Shirley Temple, everything is so doggone swell on the Good Ship Lollipop
that your naive and pedantic "story" just irritated the shit out of me.

I don't know what success means, but I definitely think you should get a bull horn and hit the streets of Detroit with your message. Make sure the REALLY POOR people hear your touching message of hard work and sacrifice and how, if you try hard enough, ANYONE can be "SUCCESSFUL"!


Your message plays fine in Candyland, but not in backstabbing, corpratist, capitalist america.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. FYI-Your post SCREECHES rethuglican talking points-personal responsibility & all that crap.
Edited on Tue May-20-08 06:36 PM by TheGoldenRule
What you don't realize is that not everyone has the same education, job experience or just plain luck to make it all happen. The cards are stacked against far too many people in this country and it's only gotten worse. Soon, it will only be those who have the "good" connections, "good" credit, "good" health, belong to the "right" aka rethuglican political party or who live in the "good" part of town who will get the breaks and decent jobs in this country. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. Part of the reasons I sought work out of the US- I am an economic refugee of sorts
Edited on Tue May-20-08 02:12 PM by JCMach1
Pay, benefits, time-off, health insurance, family safety and crime issues. All of those things are better here than back in the states... :(

I could have kept my 'noble' (lol) position in the states and continued living pay check to pay check... I decided to get off the hamster wheel and forge my own way. So far, so good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
20. The insidious nature of inflation
People have a disconnect between what it costs to live now and what they think it should cost. In my opinion that gap is about 20-30 years or so worth of inflation. Thus the comments by people who feel that making 50K a year is "well off". It was, in the early 1980's when you could buy a house for 100K, a nice car for 15K and health insurance was peanuts. So now we have people screaming that a firefighter making 100K is "obscene" , when that salary buys them the equivalent of a 50K a year salary in the 80's. At the rate we are going it is going to take 50K just to stay out of poverty in a decade. And we will still have folks screaming that such folks are "rich"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
23. I have no idea what lif will be like for my kids. How much further will they slide downhill than we
did? My dad owns a house. If we inherit it from him one day, and if we can afford to take care of it (Oil heats the water and the house) we might all wind up living there together because the kids can't afford to go anywhere else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. I'm a retired airline pilot, and we're hurting.
Yep, I'm one of those rich airline pilots.
:sarcasm:
Of course my former employer, Trans World Airlines, went bankrupt for the 2nd or 3rd time (I lost count) and finally ceased to be. My small pension is now in the hands of the Pension Benefits Guarantee Corp. and they're a few billion dollars in the red.

And when I crunched the numbers to see what our retirement would be like (back in '99) I foolishly didn't foresee what we would be paying for food and energy now.
Stupid me.

And because of my pension and the money we have to take from an IRA to live on (all taxable INCOME!:-() we pay income tax on 85% of our social security benefits.
We're screwn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC