Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Re: Libby jury note

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 04:42 PM
Original message
Re: Libby jury note
From what I have seen, if a jury is trying to resolve reasonable doubt issues, the Defendant's goose is cooked.

If a jury buys the Defendant's story, there is no need to reach reasonable doubt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree, plus, if we can believe what we just heard on Wolfe's show,
"No the presecutor does NOT have to prove that it's impossible for someone to forget!"

Hmmm, it's gonna be a LONG WEEKEND for the scooter!!!!!! No sleep and lots of booze I bet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree. Note two does not look good for Scooter
since the Judge will say the standard does not require the Govt to prove its 'not humanly possible' to forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I missed the note
I think. Was that the one about wanting a dictionary? Did they say what they wanted a dictionary for exactly? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. NO. This note was sent to the judge just before the jury left today.
They asked for the definition of "reasonable doubt" and does the presecutor have to prove it's impossible for someone to forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Thank you for the explanation. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Right.
That is very important. Judge Walton had responded to the dictionary request by saying if there was a specific term that they needed defined, he would work with both sides to come up with a proper definition for the context of a jury's deliberations.

I can think of no person I would prefer to explain the correct, legal definition of "reasonable doubt" than Reggie Walton. I suspect that he will clarify this on Monday morning in a manner that will help even the most rigid juror understand thaty the prosecution does not have to remove every possible doubt -- only reasonable doubt. And the jury will return the guilty verdicts in the afternoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. new one from this afternoon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. thank you for the link n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Oh, you're cruel
:high five me:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Yeah...
or maybe Scooter pulls a Ken Lay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Didn't some loser post that we'd have a verdict today. I could smack'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. All guesses are speculation. Don't get mad at the poster. Fridays
really are pretty standard decision days.

I feel all the info that has been releasedin the last few days has been positive for a guilty verdict, so be patient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC