Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Larry Flynt says more Dems on Palfrey's list than Republicans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:46 AM
Original message
Larry Flynt says more Dems on Palfrey's list than Republicans
Also, Vitter was the only name on list that met Flynt's interest in exposing hypocritical politicians.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,353876,00.html

...Flynt said he believes that in her quest to avoid prison time -- her sentencing hearing had been scheduled for July -- Palfrey was prepared to release one or two final names connected to her case.

... He said he knew some of the clients' names, and they include big-hitters in the political and media worlds. None of those names came to light, though, because they didn't fit the mold that Flynt was pushing for: politicians who said one thing and did another. Only Vitter, Flynt said, appeared to match that description.

But Flynt hinted at much juicier material to be unearthed.

"Let me put it this way, there were more Democrats on it than Republicans," he said, supporting his theory that the only reason this case was of interest was because of the number of Democrats who could be targeted by the Bush administration.

But Flynt said his conversations with Palfrey were off the record, and if any investigators come knocking on his door for names, they'll have to look elsewhere.

Flynt said the only person who might know more about those conversations with Palfrey is Moldea, who was working with Palfrey on a book. Flynt said he has no financial stake in that book


----------------------------------------

You want to know why no names were released after Vitter and the two or three others? Seems as though there was no real scandal value in them as Flynt sees it.

Doesn't sound like Flynt's going to be naming any others either.

Incidentally, Moldea (the other source) is the one who said Palfrey said she'd commit suicide before going back to jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. In the public interest
that list needs to be revealed. Every unrevealed name on that list is a potential blackmail target who needs to be put out of any position of public trust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree that any politician (R) or (D) on that list needs to be forced to come clean
for exactly the same reason.

A number of spy scandals have been started up as a result of the spy being blackmailed with exposure of his daliances.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. That answers one question
I posted before about visiting some RW web sites and seeing that they aren't buying the "suicide" angle either. I wonder if the Bush admin has the list and are waiting for the right time to release it?

How reliable is Flynt? It seems when he has the dirt on repubs, people here push for him to speak out, now what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asteroid2003QQ47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Palfrey was not marketing underage boys,...
of COURSE the the list was top heavy with Democrats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. and not only was she headed to prison, but the feds seized
all of her assets, house, bank & brokerage accounts; her life was seriously fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. She could have been suicided but probably wasn't as much as people want to think it
She was free on bond from the time the trial ended up till yesterday. If she truly had any earth-shaking names she had no shortage of opportunities to spill her guts to any number of reporters. If I thought I was going down I would have chosen the very first moment I had to start taking people down with me.

The fact that she didn't do exactly that and the fact that Flynt has said Vitter was the only name he found worthy of exposing as a "family values" hypocrite pretty much seems to say there was no "blow your socks off" revelation in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asteroid2003QQ47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Rose colored glasses.
What I WANT to think, Mike, is that I live in a country where Palfrey, her staff and clients could go about their business without having their lives seriously fucked up by the Feds. I would also like to think that I am not alone in thinking that.

I don't know what happened but if I had to bet one way or the other I'd put my money on someone pulling on her ankles. That you attach so much import on her not doing exactly what you would have done strengthens my resolve and makes me think, from Big Brother's perspective, the system works!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC