Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Babs, you slut!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bluescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:10 AM
Original message
Babs, you slut!!
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2008/05/02/journalist_senator_were_an_item/

So Barbara Walters disclosed yesterday that she had a long affair with then Massachusetts Senator Edward Brooke, who was married at the time.

Why is this news? Brooke has been out of the public eye for quite some time. I recall that his daughter's allegations of financial "misreporting" during his divorce proceedings against his first wife torpedoed his Senate career and paved the way for Paul Tsongas and later, John Kerry, to be elected to his seat in the Senate. Why did she have to spill the beans, to make it public? I was always taught that a gentleman doesn't kiss and tell. Isn't that true for ladies as well? Is she just trying to sell more books? :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. anything for another buck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galaxy21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Rosie: Babwa how could you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Of course - it's purely done to sell more books
she was just waiting for the right time to disclose it. If she can do that in conjunction with a new book release, it makes it a lot easier for her to get onto the big talk shows like Oprah, Ellen, Larry King, the Daily Show, Colbert, etc, etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Of course, men who sleep with women aren't sluts...
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. She is a Don Juanita n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. It isn't the affair I object to.
It's the kiss and tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The name calling was totally uncalled for...
I know many here at DU think it's great and wonderful to call people whores and sluts. They think they're right in doing so.

Me...I think that kind of name-calling is offensive to women.

Especially, since no one is calling men the same names. It's mostly women that get the brunt of it.

But, well, I'm in the minority here at DU in thinking that this kind of thing demeans not just women...but everyone.

So go ahead and call her a slut because you didn't like the fact she talked about her sex life.

You can bet if she'd been a man we wouldn't have seen this kind of thread. You may believe and attempt to convince yourself and others that it's not true...but you'll never convince me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. i am and have always been an equal opportunity name caller. just a word, slut and whore and
a male can be one as clearly as a female. i have never seen a distinction between the genders. i agree with what you are saying that many do.... but not all people and because of that i will probably not change my ways, lol lol. just words, with difinitions and i figure if one is willing to make the choice to fit the discription, they should not have issue with the word, regardless of the harshness society has put on the word. it is harsh and blatant for a reason.

anyway... just another perspective
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, just words...that's all they are...
no matter that they've been used to oppress and demean women. To me...that name you called Barbara Walters is no different than calling a black person the 'n' word. It's offensive and disgusting. It's just a word, though.

I knew you'd find justification for using it...as if it's a good thing. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. let me clarify... i am not the op. and i am a believer in using the words
they fit the difinition as opposed using it against all women for as you say, to demean and repress. i think it is totally approrpiate you called poster on using it with walters cause she is not a slut... from evidence we have of choices and behaviors in life and i think the op used the word in exactly the wrong manner, you are speaking of

shame on him, wink

for real

i agree with that

i was just expanding the conversation on the use of slut/whore for both genders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'm sorry...my mistake...
I get frustrated with this kind of thing and I shouldn't have taken it out on you. I wasn't paying attention like I should have been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. i hear ya
being woman myself amongst these males, lol lol

peace... and good friday to you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. I am a man, and I was called a "ho"...
by all of my friends, in my younger years. Unlike most women, I did not consider it a derogatory term at the time. In hindsight, I do regret the pain I may have caused due to my selfish and cavalier attitude toward the women I slept with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. because in your immaturity you did not take it seriously but as a badge to wear
i can understand that. but the times i have called a male a slut, it has not been a compliment, nor judgment for that matter and the ones i talked to understood that.

for most all of us there is a difference between our youth and maturity

btw... generally the time that i did call male a slut, in all seriousness,... it was when they were whining about the repercussions of their choices and they felt on the one hand, cause of their gender they were to go out and fuck nondiscriminately and without responsibility and ended up with fucked up situations instead of just mere fun. as they would say why me... i would tell em. not a lot of empathy there. suck it up and deal with it. and there were many and varied repercussions.

and... thanks for you post. i like hearing from male perspective in honesty instead of the manly man game they think they have to play. oh.... like you in youth taking pride in ho... lol. thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I am appalled...
even to this day, when I think about my past behavior. And I even thought of myself, as one of the good guys in those days, as far as, equal rights for women and such. I, thankfully, evolved, with the help of my girlfriend who eventually became my wife. But you would be shocked to hear how men who are supposedly long past that immaturity, still talk about women these days, in private company. I know I am. And yes, I do call them out on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. thank you
Edited on Fri May-02-08 10:25 AM by seabeyond
lol, you just dont know why i appreciate your post so much. as i talk about youth and maturity, the issue i see weighing on female, and ultimately on male cause there is a repercussion for the behavior (action/reaction), is too many of the men are not reaching maturity today, even as they age. decency is no more.

i am not shocked by what males are saying about the women, it is not so hidden and behavior is really evident on the shifted view of female

my husband didnt realize either, how some of the choices he made were degrading to female or disrepctful until it was said in a way for him to be able to "hear" it. then.... it is like geez, of course.

what has been hard for me is growing up with almost all male, and male being majority of my friends and me being awfully independent myself, i spent my 20's walking it like a male, lol. i get it. and getting it made it hard for me to ever want to tie myself to a man. i just happen to find a special one that is probably more nice and respectful than i am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. OK
I understand why this upsets you, and I apologize. Tell me, though, what would you call a person who boasts about having had a lengthy affair with a married person, simply to sell more books? What word would be acceptable to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Greedy...
That's the worst I can come up with because, IMO, anyone can talk about their sex life as much as they want whether it's to sell a book or just for the hell of it.

No one should be thought less of because of how they conduct their sex life as long as they're not hurting anyone. Sex is still considered the big bad evil by much of society and women catch the worst of it for the most part.

Sex is a normal biological function that can provide both physical and emotional gratification. It shouldn't be looked down on nor should those consenting adults be made to feel guilty for it either.

Barbara Walters isn't the first person to write a tell-all book...she certainly won't be the last.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Disagree. You let her off too easy.
Edited on Mon May-05-08 03:07 PM by bluescribbler
anyone can talk about their sex life as much as they want whether it's to sell a book or just for the hell of it.

Would you feel the same if an ex SO bragged to all who would listen the salacious details about your tryst of years ago?

No one should be thought less of because of how they conduct their sex life as long as they're not hurting anyone.

Do you know that this revelation did not hurt Senator Brooke or members of his family? I suspect not.

Sex is a normal biological function that can provide both physical and emotional gratification. It shouldn't be looked down on nor should those consenting adults be made to feel guilty for it either.

I agree with that, as far as it goes. As I wrote upthread, I have no problem with their affair. But I do have a problem with her need to air it in public. It's not my business, and it's not your business, either.

Barbara Walters isn't the first person to write a tell-all book...she certainly won't be the last.

Randy Cunningham wasn't the first Congressman to accept bribes, and he won't be the last. That still doesn't make it acceptable behavior. Walters' behavior is worse than greedy. She dragged Senator Brooke's name through the mud for no reason than her own gratification. I find that inexcusable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. Damn! I thought you were talking about Babs Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. I don't think "Babs Bewsh" and "slut:" should be in the same universe as one another.
Just the THOUGHT of . . . OK, I'll stop right there, because it's giving me the same feeling as eels all over my upper torso. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
11. evidence of one of the last Republican scandals dealing with a Republican male
Edited on Fri May-02-08 09:21 AM by zbdent
having an affair (sex) with ... A FEMALE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
15. Ed Brooke was a liberal GOP and more liberal than most of his
Democratic opponents. He was a rat of a husband but a good Senator. He was also the last GOP I voted for.

If Babs had to have an affair with a GOP, at least she picked a competent and largely humane one.

Brooke lost to Tsongas because the latter was finally a liberal Democrat, although the bad publicity from a messy divorce contributed to his defeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC