Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I just watched Jim Webb's appearance on Countdown. If he can hold it together, and have

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 08:27 PM
Original message
I just watched Jim Webb's appearance on Countdown. If he can hold it together, and have
a productive term or two in the Senate, I want him to be the nominee whenever it's possible. I think he has the potential to eclipse the whole crop of current candidates, and I think there are some very good ones among them.

I know this is a redundant sentiment but I just had to post this thread.

Aside from having possibly THE best biography and resume around, he's one of the very few to consistently say what needs saying, in strong terms, and not mince words. He's a LEADER. Even among Congressman, Senators, and Governors, real leadership is a rare quality.

I hope he's got a good plan for this Senate term to put those leadership skills to productive use.

I am SO glad to have contributed to this man's campaign.

And, as much as I've despaired over the state of the Democratic Party recently, it speaks very well to have chosen Webb to give the SOTU response. SOMEONE aside from us recognizes the potential of this man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't.
I like the speech, I like his stance on the war, but I don't trust him. Maybe a VP spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. why don't you trust him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. He's a conservative, former GOP.
He's right about the war, of course. But that isn't saying much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. ...you do know he's a former GOP'er, right ?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. of course some say that about Clark even though he wasn't
but he did vote, apparently, for Reagan and Bush I, but he's pretty progressive. I think people have the right to change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Webb was Sec of the Navy as a (R)
I'm not sure why you brought Clark into this discussion?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Because Clark was a guy who had voted, I think, for Reagan, etc. etc.
He is tarred with the same brush--he must be some kind of Republican Trojan Horse who can never be trusted, even if you agree with what he says and prefer his views and leadership style to the "name brand leading candidates".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poiuytsister Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. I was thinking the exact thing
as I was watching him on Countdown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illinoisprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. I read an article that I agree with. Webb would not be happy as a prez or vp
he is independent and wouldn't like being leashed as presidents and vp's are. Secret Service everywhere, no freedom of movement, having every second planned out. No. Webb would be miserable. He's a free roamer and independent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You raise a good point. He is an intellectual, but a regular guy
thus his appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. You see where the problem is with this.
Already in this thread, people are starting in with the "but he's Republican" shit.

Let's remember that the most successful Republican president was a former FDR Democrat. If the Republicans had been as purity obsessed as many of the Democrats are, they would never have had Reagan for their president (and his presidency was a tremendous boon to his party, even though it was catastrophic for the country and the world).

I will never rule out anyone because of their former political affiliation, as long as I believe that they are genuine in where they are now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. I asked a republican if he had listened to the "democrat" response
to the SOTU, the guy had the NERVE to tell me that he could only
stomach a few minutes of Webb, because....wait for it.... he said Webb's













HAIRLINE bothered him!

I was flabbergasted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I am sure this guy would be willing to suit up, go to Iraq and take a bullet for his emperor, who
has the hairline he prefers.

Sadly, many Americans really deserve the leadership they get. Too bad the rest of us do not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. So many hairlines have brought us to war...
But, let us not forget how they have brought us together...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Remember last year? And all the comments about Tim Kaine's
eyebrow? As if that made a whit of difference to the message he was stating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. How about Gephardt's eyebrows?
I really think he was never taken seriously as a Presidential candidate mainly because his sandy eyebrows so typical of a red head practically vanished on television.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-24-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. He introduced himself to the country in the most impressive fashion
That was an amazing response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. We need leaders in Congress, not just the White House
There was a time when both parties fielded an impressive bench in Congress. I could listen to hearings on the radio and identify the players just from hearing them. It wwas great to garden in the summer - like listening to a baseball game! If we could do that again, it would be the needed balance to the Imperial Presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I agree that this balance is needed, but we desperately need to wrest the
"imperial presidency" from the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC