Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This Vets Take on the Commander of Walter Reed being relieved

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 02:32 PM
Original message
This Vets Take on the Commander of Walter Reed being relieved
Washington Post today claims they knew for Three Years about building 18. This move is not good enough. This ass needs to face a Article 32 and be held accountable. Any other Officer who know should stand and face the court. Am I angry your dam right I am. All I heard during the debate was how Republicans support the troops and veterans. Bullshit where has the oversight been for the last six years. Right know how do we know other Military Hospitals and VA's are not like this we don't.

ENOUGH BRING THEM HOME NOW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wait till all the details come out.
About the Army making those guys and gals make formations and inspections. I think the shit is yet to hit the fans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. damn straight that people should be on trial
for these failures (and coverups and petty retaliations)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Agree,
This is so disgusting and shameful. If they did not have adequate facilities they should have transferred patients to other facilities even non VA ones that are clean and safe. The Commander should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. Bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am not sure I agree but it should be looked into
Bush has been cutting the VA Budget and it could be he did the best he could with the money Bush/Rummy gave him..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Walter Reed is a DoD hospital not a VA one
Most of the defence budget, it seems, has been funneled towards Al-Qaida groups' slush funds in Lebanon and Halliburtons coffers.

The sooner the whole crooked gang are frogmarched out of the Whitehouse in handcuffs the better for everybody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. You convalesce in the hospital you have, not the hospital you wish you had
Edited on Thu Mar-01-07 03:16 PM by MindPilot
While your assertion about budget restraints is probably true. I don't think it is a defense. Anyone in a leadership position with an ounce of integrity would have at least made sure there was a clear record of complaint up the chain. Somebody made the decision to do nothing and let the place deteriorate. That somebody is where the buck stops, and I seriously doubt they had an "E" in front of their pay grade.

ETA: Walter Reed I think falls under DoD budget, not VA so in that situation all that has to happen to get something done is for someone with some rank to give an order. The VA is kind of a quasi-civilian organization which gives it several more layers of bureaucracy than a military hospital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Thanks for the correction (DoD not VA)
Still, though, can't they contract out if they don't have the facilities to treat patients?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Of course.
I've seen it done and from what I understand it is or at least was a real common practice. I was in hospital several years ago and they had one whole wing that took the overflow from the local military hospital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. I spent half my time in the Navy
getting ready for the next inspection and on occasion it was butt puckering time. If we were fucked up it did not take a newspaper article to result in corrective action. Surely to God, that two star at Walter Reed had a boss or bosses whose job was oversight of subordinate commands. Firing a field commander for malfeasance is not necessarily oversight its a failure of oversight. If my Sailors fucked up it was just as much my fault for not doing my job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Not only that, Chief, but observing wrong-doing and not reporting it
is almost as bad as the wrong-doing itself. Sometimes worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. and finally the cover-up is the worst. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. when you find out how much money was funnelled to private contractors...just wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. court-martial the whole stinking lot of them--let them rot in leavenworth!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. At the very least a bunch of careers should end over this.
Those at the higher level of command should face courts martial. I would also suggest that congress take the additional step of allowing the men and women who were the victims of neglect and abuse to sue in civil court.

And am I reading this right, the man in charge of a medical facility is not an MD? That's *really* fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I will try to ascertain this guys "punishment."
Being "fired" in the military doesn't necessarily mean you lose your job. You are either reassigned to a job with lesser responsibility (now that makes sense huh?) or are allowed to retire peacefully and get a big old whopping monthly pension which is exactly what a two-star will receive. And being a two star he has at least 20 years of service in and is eligible for retirement. Most likely his punishment will be no retirement medal. Not surprised that the place was run by a non-MD. Walter Reed has scads of senior medical personnel who devote their time to medical services. One of the most important jobs that two star had was to maintain the physical plant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. right on the mark Boss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. reminds me of the bastards involved in "tailhook" whose "punishment" was being relieved of flight
status--and being assigned to the admiral's staff.

some punishment, eh? I demanded to know why they weren't all court-martialled, ESPECIALLY in view of the fact that they said, IN PRINT, that they would refuse to cooperate with any investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. And as a member of an Admiral's staff
you are in a position of oversight to subordinate commands. There wasn't much in the way of "punishment" relative to tailhook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. Think you'll be hearing Bush boasting about having visited Walter Reed for awhile?
Edited on Thu Mar-01-07 03:17 PM by aint_no_life_nowhere
Walter Reed? Who's that?

And who's Abramoff? Who's Kenny Boy? Who's Osama? Who's Cunningham? Who's Delay? Who's Foley? Scooter who? And what's a levee?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. The whole Bush regime is about non-responsibility.
What party of responsibility? What party of support for troops and veterans? What chu say? Hmmm? Can't hear you through my Halliburton earplugs...........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. I said pretty much the same thing when I heard that he'd been relieved
Even if he stands trial, this needs to go higher. I'd bet my left 'anything' that the conditions there were well and widely known over at the Five Sided War Palace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Yep you would win that bet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC