|
"The New York Times confirms that "over a thousand" officers and troops of the Iraqi army declined to fight the Mahdi Army in Basra or deserted their posts. It also reports that Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki replaced them by inducting 10,000 Shiite "tribal" fighters into the Iraqi army. But the Iraqi press didn't call them "tribal," it called them Badr Corps, the paramilitary of the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, headed by Abdul Aziz al-Hakim and now al-Maliki's main political ally. I'm not sure about the source of the discrepancy, but the NYT piece seems to be based on interviews with Iraqi and American government officials. It is possible that the need to strengthen the Iraqi army by turning to a Shiite militia trained by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards (terrorists!) was just too embarrassing to admit. So the officials used the euphemism "tribal forces" with the foreign press."
Juan Cole is cuttingly kind, here. The NYT is flat-out lying and there is no recourse. There is nothing we can do but point it out. It really pisses me off... :grr:
Also mentioned in Dr. Cole's piece - US troops in Iraq were dressed in civilian clothes and came under attack by Mahdi Army troops. WTF?
Juan is smokin' today...
www.juancole.com
|