See prior threads:
ETStudy Says Ethanol Not Worth the Energy
Topic started by Judi Lynn on Jul-17-05 02:49 PM (49 replies)
Last modified by leQ on Jul-22-05 09:09 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1634181Edwards twice voted in favor of Yucca Mountain - now he says he is the only one against Nuclear
Topic started by pirhana on Jan-16-08 05:10 PM (114 replies)
Last modified by slipslidingaway on Jan-17-08 02:12 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=408745440. There is only ONE long-term solution to the storage of radioactive waste from fission reactors. Updated at 6:19 PM
That solution is to build nuclear FUSION reactors.
You can take the waste from the FISSION reactors and feed it into the FUSION reactors, reducing it to simple plasma.
Eventually, someday, we will probably be able to use fusion reactors to produce more energy than it takes to run them.
But in the meantime, fusion reactors are the most efficient trash-incinerators within 93 million miles of Earth.
And they produce ALMOST no radioactive waste.
The only radioactive waste fusion reactors produce is when the shielding around them becomes too old and brittle to function, and must eventually be destroyed. And guess what? THAT can be put right into the reactor, too!