Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember the Cunningham scandal? Judge angry at Wilkes.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Joanie Baloney Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:11 PM
Original message
Remember the Cunningham scandal? Judge angry at Wilkes.
Judge: Perturbed if Wilkes lied about finances

By Greg Moran
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

5:51 p.m. February 11, 2008

SAN DIEGO – A clearly perturbed federal judge on Monday warned Brent Wilkes, already facing a lengthy prison sentence for bribing Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham, that he could be in more trouble if he lied to the court about his finances in order to get free lawyers to defend him in a second case. U.S. District Court Judge Larry Burns said he would allow prosecutors to review a document Wilkes submitted to the judge under seal.


Wilkes offered the affidavit in the summer to persuade Burns to appoint two federal public defenders to represent him in an upcoming trial on conspiracy and fraud charges. Prosecutors say Wilkes has access to more than $1 million in assets and equity in property, a contention that appears to be based on documents from Wilkes' divorce proceedings in state court.

Burns said if he is convinced prosecutors are correct and Wilkes did not tell the truth, it could have an effect on Wilkes' sentencing and whether he continues to remain free on bond after his conviction.



See more at: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/cunningham/20080211-1751-bn11wilkes.html


(BTW, I did NOT make up the reporter's last name. Heh, heh!)

:)

JB

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why is Greg a funny name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The OP said LAST name, not first. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I knew that
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 10:28 PM by Generic Brad
;-) I'm not a moran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanie Baloney Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. No...you're not a Moran
I thought the Greg commment was funny.

But I'm easy. ;)

JB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. GOOD. Lock that lying SOB up and squeeze him till he pops
Wilkes was laundering DOD taxpayer money through dummy companies receiving bogus contracts and turning it into campaign contributions and outright bribes.

And he's only the tip of a large iceberg.

The GOP started as a political party. It's become an interstate racketeering organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. A Bush judicial appointee perturbed?
Well, we'll see just what that translates into. I've never met a judge that enjoyed being lied to, but I'm sure the mitigating circumstance of Wilkes' corruption being an exclusively Republican phenomenon will keep Judge Burns from ruling . . . injudiciously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. What's Dusty Foggo doing these days?


Although it's waiting for him if needed,
he's probably not planning an escape to Paraguay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. What a fucking scumbag.
This case has been a stench here in SD. Damn Cunningham and damn Brent Wilkes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanie Baloney Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You said it!
And I'm sure you heard that fuckin' Duncan Hunter's son is running for Congress for the same district as his dear ol' dad. That's all we need...a Dunkin' Junior!!

Poor San Diego. :(

JB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elspeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. I know. It never frigging ends.
San Diego politics suck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagickMuffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Did anyone read the comments???.......... ROFLMAO

By sdbrother on 02/11/2008 at 6:46 p.m.

Good to see a tough, but fair judge. Obama will not appoint good judges like this.

Report Abuse
By Rumi on 02/11/2008 at 6:55 p.m.

Ah, sdbro, you're calling the presidency for Obama.
I like that.

Report Abuse
By Servus on 02/11/2008 at 6:57 p.m.

And somehow this turns into a slam on Obama? funny...






Funny how these loyalist can never see the truth.

I guess that just comes from having their heads so far up their asses, it hard to wipe away decades of shit from their eyes.

Poor Babies.

I WANT OUR MONEY BACK.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanie Baloney Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Well said
The comments are the funniest thing in the U-T. Although, when you realize these people could be your neighbors, it doesn't seem as funny any longer.

:puke:

JB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. Another K&R for ya!
Sad thing is these guys will end up taking the fall for the slimeball who should really be paying the price.

I'm firmly convinced that those convicted of high finance crime should not be put in jail. Rather they should be forced to live in poverty, prevented from any contact with any place there is money. With not so much as a checking account, they would be allowed to have a minimum wage job, that's it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC