Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone who thinks gas prices are not high enough

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:36 PM
Original message
Anyone who thinks gas prices are not high enough
For whatever reason, GO TO HELL!

ExxonMobil sets annual profit record: $40.6B

http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/earnings/2008-02-01-exxon_N.htm

:grr: :nuke: :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ordinaryaveragegirl Donating Member (853 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Screw ExxonMobil.
We get gouged, and they make $40B. And I'll bet a good chunk of it is going to the $ grubbing, Chimpy-loving execs. :mad: :mad: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. What if you think prices should be higher so as to limit production of green house gases?
Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. If the price goes higher . . .
If the price goes higher because we're levying more taxes to pay for something worthwhile, that's one thing. The price is going higher in this case to line the overstuffed pockets of overrich petroleum fatcats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
62. I don't think many people are saying that Exxon Mobil isn't making enough money.
Those on the left suggest that gas prices aren't high enough in order to discourage driving and encourage other forms of transportation. Also, I think they're suggesting lower profit margins and higher taxes to pay for those worthwhile things. I think you'll be hard pressed to find anyone suggesting that Exxon's profit margins are too low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. good in theory, red herring in practice
people have to drive to get to work. They have to drive to get groceries. Our society is built around roads. I see as much traffic today as I did four years ago, despite the fact that the price of gas has doubled. All you do when you raise the price of gas is make it more difficult for people to get along, and make oil companies rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. Ah - but are people driving to the movies as much? or non-essential driving?
Maybe in some communties people are choosing to use public transportation more?

I'm not necessarily in favor of this line of thinking either, but it is interesting to consider.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
focusfan Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
73. Around here they drive thier kids to school instead of ridding the school bus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. true, it's painful
but if you were moving right now, would you take the larger house farther away, knowing you pay another 6 bucks, minimum, a day in gas? or the smaller house farther in? or do you look for a place that does have public transportation?

you're buying a car, do you buy the one that gets 25 mpg or 30?

do you drive to grandma's house for Easter or take the bus/train/plane? There are decisions you make, every day, about whether or not to use gasoline and how much to use. slowly, those decisions are going to start reflecting the higher price of fuel, and we will begin to shift.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. whats the average MPG of European cars and why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XboxWarrior Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
61. No quote feature......
But I ride my Harley in the Summer, all across the West......

There are way fewer big ass motorhomes towing lexus 4x4's than
back in the 90's.

I drive a suby 4x4 in the winter, 28 mpg........so prices don't bother
me too much @ $2.70 here in the mountains of CO.

But I don't believe Exxon/Mobile should get the tax breaks they do.

I'm kinda socialist that way.......in fact, I would go so far
as nationalizing the petro biz in the US.

p.s. I also drive a '73 VW Bus.......call me a Commie

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. It's the only thing that will force a shift in consumer purchasing
When gas is too expensive to drive the Excursion, no one will drive the Excursion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. That is pure bull shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. This country does not have the mass transit to offset the driving
I have to drive to get to work. Not close enough to walk or ride bike and have time to get there and home again. Plus the climate is not conducive to peddling this time of year.

90% of America is completely dependant upon our gas guzzling autos. We can't change that because that is what the car companies offer.

Most of my family lives 1000 miles away or more, air travel is not an option. I will not drive a tiny tin can because I am not a big enough Tree Hugger.

I realize we need to care for the environment but pricing people out of the automobile is the dumbest fucking plan in all time. Anyone wants to argue that can just go fly a fucking kite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. where can I get me one of them kites?
your chosen lifestyle (where you live, where you work, what you drive) was determined under lower priced gasoline, I assume? Guess what? those prices are gone, and they ain't coming back, without a global economic catastrophe. so what are you going to do about it? you won't drive a tin can, you are going to have to a: move closer to work, b: get a job closer to home, c: buy a more efficient automobile or d: spend more money for gas. You can't afford your lifestyle anymore because it was predicated on a poor understanding of economics in the first place. Sorry.

in five years, when gas is still at these levels, are you still going to be complaining, or will you have made changes to reduce YOUR need to purchase as much? you can't worry about everyone else, you can only worry about yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #38
48. Oh and I can easily sell my house and move to the inner city
LOL!

NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #48
53. then pay more for gas
I'm sorry, I know it is painful, but it's the way of the world. Your lifestyle was based on a cheap, plentiful supply of a non-renewable resource. That resource is no longer as cheap or plentiful, through no fault of your own (actually, the fault is pretty much in the hands of China and India). That must be very frustrating for you. But you are simply going to have to learn to accept that transportation prices are not going back down and adjust your life accordingly.

my condolences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. Screwed coming and going
And you think it is tough shit.

When will America stand up and do something about getting screwed?

Damn we are stupid when we legitimize ever fucking time someone rips us off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #54
57. ok, what do you propose?
let's zero out ExxonMobil's profits from the extraction, transportation, refining and retailing of gasoline. they are doing it simply for cost now, ok? the local gas station doesn't make a profit, the trucking company, the pipeline, the refinery, nothing. So, let's break it down a bit, shall we?

there are 42 gallons of liquid in a barrel of oil. you get about 28 gallons of gasoline from that barrel (And byproducts for the rest, like heating oil, plastics, etc) the current price of a future barrel of oil (to be delivered in 6 months) right now in New York is $89.12/bbl. So, taking the 42 gallons/bbl number, crude petroleum in New York currently costs $2.12/gallon. before it is refined at all. I saw gasoline in DC yesterday for $3.04/gl. That includes federal tax of $.18 and DC taxes of $.17 (for a total of $.35 in taxes. So the actual price the station was charging was $2.69/gallon before taxes. that's really not a lot, when you look at the price someone paid for the crude, right? for $.57, someone refined it, transported it and sold it. not a bad price, really.

or are you planning to do something about the price of oil on the global scale?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. How about alternative energy sources?
Let's face it mass transit will never work in most of this country, we are spread too far apart.

Electric cars, Hydrogen fuel cell?

For home heating, what ever happened to the heat pump and ground source heating? Many places cities will not allow you to use ground source within city limits.

Solar power, and wind power. But no, all this country can do is continue to consume oil and cry about peak oil.
Then the ultra tree hugger's think it should be priced out of reach to reduce consumption. All that will do is raise the price of everything else as long as we remain on gasoline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. What do you consider a "tiny" car?
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 02:57 PM by wuushew
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #39
49. Prius is too small to ride 1000 miles in
I owned a 1982 Chrysler Le Baron (K car body style). I could not ride 1000 mile in that car and it was considered a small luxury car at the time.

Mid size sedan is comfortable for a family of 4 to ride across country. Large enough that people are not shoulder to shoulder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #49
82. Rent a car for the rare times you drive cross-country
It is cheaper than owning a large car 365 days a year that gets poor gas mileage, and saves wear and tear on your primary vehicle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #49
88. I drove from Florida to California in a 1995 Escort wagon.
And it was quite comfortable, actually. Put the back seats down and laid down a foam mattress so the kids could lay down and watch DVDs. Luggage was on the luggage rack. A car needn't be huge to be comfortable, unless you're morbidly obese or something.

Something like this:



Only mine had hubcaps.

Got better than 35 mpg highway and could carry tons of cargo...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. you would not have to drive a tin can if American cars used diesel
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 03:02 PM by LSK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #40
50. IF
But they don't so I shouldn't be punished for what the automakers sell us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Michigan-Arizona Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #40
74. I have a diesel pickup
I'm paying 0ver 70 cent's more per gallon over unleaded. Diesel repair's & part's seem to cost more so I'm not sure where the saving's today would be owning a diesel vehicle. Just my opinion of course
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #74
78. A agree the savings are largely illusory
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 12:50 PM by wuushew
For instance comparing otherwise similar cars like the 2006 Volkswagen Jetta shows us the following information.

The 4-Dr Sedan diesel has/had an MSRP of $23,990

The 2.5L non-turbo gasoline edition develops similar levels of torque and trim package for a MSRP of $20,290.


If we amortize those two prices over a 36-month loan, assuming 7.3% nominal interest rate we get the following: (Diesel)$158.60 a month (Gasoline)$134.14.


So what then is the cost of fuel assuming 10,000 miles a year?
Current diesel prices = $3.26 a gallon
Current gasoline prices = $2.98 a gallon


Diesel: $1,009 a year/$84 a month
Gasoline: $1355 a year/$113 a month


I have no source of data for typical car repair costs or insurance costs.

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/findacar.htm">fuel economy by model

http://www.cars.com/go/compare/trimCompare.jsp?acodes=USB60VWC033A0,USB60VWC033B0,USB60VWC033D0,USB60VWC033F0&compType=D">Volkswagon model info

http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/info/gdu/gasdiesel.asp">national fuel prices

http://aol1.bankrate.com/selaol/rate/auto_home.asp">current car loan rates





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #78
85. You forgot Time between major overhaul...
average diesel beyond 250,000. Average gas, much less.

Diesel is by design a heavier constructed machine. It is more efficient and can be just as clean.

Many modern diesels from mercedes and gm (europe) measure telemetry of each rpm. So they constantly adjust for efficiency and emissions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #85
86. Yeah, I realized that after the fact
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 03:30 PM by wuushew
plus I think most normal people probably drive 15,000 miles a year or more so a person would definitely see a savings over the life of the vehicle.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #74
84. I own 3 diesel vehicles
I pickup which gets 17 - 22 mpg and runs on b20. This costs more. My wife drives a bluetec diesel and it gets 38 - 42 mpg. It runs on b20. It has 33k miles on it and should have no maint cost until beyond 100k miles.

An e320 is a full size car that you would happily drive cross country, it can cruise at over 120mph, and is built like a brick shithouse. Great used car deal.

The last diesel is an 240d circa 82. It has over 300,000 miles. I swapped the dash a while back so not sure the exact mileage. I drove this car for years. This is a project car, but gets 35mpg. Also runs b20.

Diesels last forever.

I work for a tool and die company and we use diesel trucks and suburbans for fleet. They run forever so by not replacing them every 5 years you save big money.

The diesel is 20% more efficient than an equiv gas engine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. Well are pepole going to have the desire tochange that if Gas is cheap? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #35
44. Or was pricing people into the automobile
the worst fucking idea of all time?

Either way, you have to give to get. Easier long distance travel, more environmental impact. Stuck with the two legs, can't do as much. The best anyone can do is break even.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRF450 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #35
58. I'm not a big enough tree hugger either.
Thats why I drive an 01 Trans Am which is so much more fun to drive than a little tin can:) But for such a high powered performance car it does get respectable fuel milage. I average around 22-23mpg and have reached 31mpg on the interstate going 74mph. Thats coming from a 345hp 5.7 v8.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #35
63. you posted before that you live 5 miles from work, and 2 miles from the grocery store...
LOTS of people bike those kinds of distances, even in cold weather. my former neighbor was a chicago school teacher who rode his bike to work 6 miles each way, year round.

and pricing gas so that people are motivated to find alternatives would be one of the best things we could do environment AND economy-wise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. Yeah, screw poor folk! It's the Democratic way! The party of the People!
Fuck those poor people...... let 'em eat cake!

Fuck this shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. What is the alternative?
Maybe if the stupid Michigan Congressional delegation would stop fighting higher CAFE standards we could acutally get somewhere.

Global warming is a real threat you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #33
45. Poverty is a real threat, you know. People DIE from it.
Does it matter to you?

What the fuck has happened to the Democratic party?

You shit on us, then laugh and say, "But you have to vote for us."

Look at yourselves!!

Shame!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
42. Or, alternative, we could chamption effective mass transportation
That would be cheaper from both an individual and community perspective.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. Hey! Here's a thought! This worked before!
Try rationing!

It worked.

But, of course, it would hurt you, too, and we can't have that, now can we??

As long as it only hurts poor folk, then you're fine with it.

FUCK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Yup... worked fine before...
even though spoiled citizens thought it was just AWFUL. :eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. You got it - fuck poor people.
Thank you for diagnosing me so accurately. And while we are at it, there's another person I'd like to say fuck off to, but rules prohibit it, so I will hold my tongue.

Bryant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
81. I think a vast majority of that increase should be paid by the oil companies
in order to pay for the problems caused by their dangerous products--and the rest to research to get off polluting technology for good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yet the government gives them extensive tax breaks to keep gas prices low
Does it make any sense to anyone why we're giving them these tax breaks and paying inflated gasoline prices while they're posting record profits?

Didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ummm...
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 12:54 PM by Spider Jerusalem
gasoline prices are significantly higher in the US than *everywhere* in the developed world, still.

There's also this little thing called 'supply and demand'; maybe you've heard of it...it's the reason crude oil is trading at near $100 a barrel (demand from India and China added to demand from US/Europe/Japan/Oceania, plus the little fact that net petroleum production seems to have peaked in 2006 and not increased above those levels since).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. And yet, this oil company - one of MANY - takes in 40.5 BILLION
in PROFITS.

The high price may reflect peak oil, but how many hundreds of billions do the oil companies take off the top, and pass THAT cost down to the consumer?

There is a disconnect there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Market dynamics drive the price up.
Production costs don't increase as much. Therefore, profits increase. It's simple and basic economics. (And given the evidence of peak oil, I don't really see that, say, price controls, which would encourage GREATER use of oil, are a good thing.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Market dynamics my sweet white ass.
They are grabbing everything they can while there is still something there to grab, and screw the rest of us.

You just don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. No, you don't get it
Demand increases; supply remains flat; prices go UP. It's an inevitable fact. As long as oil remains a commodity traded on an open market, this will remain the case. Oil prices were significantly lower a decade ago because supply greatly outpaced demand (before the explosive economic growth of China and India). And there's *nothing* that can be done about it; price controls on oil in the US will not affect world market prices, and the US doesn't, and can't, produce enough oil to meet demand without imports.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. You are ignoring part of the equation.
Demand increases; supply remains flat; prices go up TO MEET DEMAND. They do NOT go up to such a degree as to provide the industry with hundreds of billions of PROFITS. THAT is called 'gouging'. They effectively have a monopoly, and can charge whatever they want, because they have no competition. In normal competetive markets, the competition mitigates the price rise because the consumer will always pay the lowest possible price for equivalent products. Though prices may rise, the profit margin remains roughly the same - such a profit margin does not account for one company making 40 billion dollars in profit.

They control production, distribution, and price without competition and we have no other place to go - THAT explains those profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. you're neglecting the open market.
Also, see below re profit margins; that's addressed elsewhere in the thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. 'they'? you mean ExxonMobil?
seems that there are a few other companies and countries with a noted interest in production, refining, transportation and distribution, I can think of a couple off the top of my head: CITGO (damn, chavez IS screwing us over, gas ain't no cheaper at CITGO than ExxonMobil), ChevronTexaco, BP, Shell/Royal Dutch...you want I should keep going? you think they're all in on it? together?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:29 PM
Original message
OT. WHERE have you been????
SO good to see you!
Hope you are well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. I've been away from DU for a while...
burnout, I suppose...but politics is like herpes; once you have the bug, it has a tendency to flare up again...heh

And I'm good; thanks for asking :) Hope you're well, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. you mean 'lower', right?
gas prices in the US are lower than in the rest of the developed world? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Right...
mistyped

*smacks self*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. figured
didn't make a whole lot of sense the other way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
43. Hey hey! It's YOU!
Long time no see brother! :bounce:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #43
70. Yeah, I've been away...
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
56. Spider!!!
Good to see you again!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #56
71. Thanks...
you too :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melm00se Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. have you looked at their revenue?
a 10.3% net margin isn't overly excessive. it is a lot less than some companies earn: Cisco 21%, Apple 14.5%, Intel 14%, Pepsi 15% and Proctor & Gamble 13% to name a few (in fact I don't think that Exxon is in the top 100 when it comes to profit margin).

Yes, both numbers (revenue and profit) are absolutely staggering in sheer size but when compared as a percentage of total revenue it kind of snaps into focus that there are other companies who, if they scaled, to the same size, revenue-wise, their numbers would actually be higher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. And their profit margin was down for the quarter from a year ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Who Is Stupid Or Selfish Enough To Think They're Not High Enough???
Special kind of dumb to think that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. people concerned about Global Warming n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
51. I'm Concerned About Global Warming, But I Could Never Say Something So Blatantly Selfish And Asinine
Such a sentiment is beyond narrow minded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
36. I am stupid ehough to think that. I happen to want my
children and my grand-children and their descendants to have at least a little time before all the oil is gone. If the price was higher, people everywhere would think twice about how they use it - or how they waste it.

And there will come a time when there is no more oil available to us. After all, every action our government has taken for the past 8 years can be traced back to oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReformedChris Donating Member (252 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. It's a Triple Threat: Future Traders, Oil Companies, and Governments
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 01:37 PM by ReformedChris
Governments play games that cause unrest, traders sieze the unrest to jack up prices, and oil companies scape up profit from the consumers. Absolutely despicable. The only way to defeat this is through superior technology and alternative transportation. Im going to get the Chevy Volt the second the damn thing hits the market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
16. This is why I think profits should be taxed the same way lotto winnings are.
What the fuck do they even do with this money? Or the obscene profits they made any of the other years since this god forsaken war started? Get it taxed and get this money out of their greedy fucking hands and back in the economy, our infrastructure, and our schools where it fucking belongs. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. well, they either invest it
or they pay it as a dividend to stockholders. what else would they do? you don't think it's in hundreds under someone's matress, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. I thought it sat in some overseas bank account generating interest.
Edited on Fri Feb-01-08 02:48 PM by EOO
Or it goes to the huge hundred-million dollar retirement/severance packages their CEOs get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. and what does that bank do with it?
oh right, lend it out. doing things like giving you a mortgage. bastards.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #34
72. Indoor Ski Resorts in the Desert
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #72
87. that is not a company
Edited on Sat Feb-02-08 09:06 PM by northzax
that is an oil producing country. It is, afterall, Dubai's oil, they can spend their profits as they will, you wouldn't suggest we force them to sell their natural resources to the west at less than market value, would you? Seems unfair to ask them for that, don't you think? Oil and sand are pretty much all they have. Should Venezuela also sell oil at below market value to the US? what do the OPEC countries, who have been nothing but fucked over by the west for hundreds of years, owe us, exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melm00se Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
37. You can find that
out, it is all included in the annual report in the financials. You amy want to review it.

In 2006, a large portion of their profit went to a stock buy back which did put that money back into the economy as for every buyer there is a seller and those sellers could range from institutional investors (mutual funds, pension funds and the like) to Bob who bought his shares thru a DRIP or ESPP program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
55. Less to profits, more to taxes, and then I get to decide what to do with tax money
That is my plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadiationTherapy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
60. Just to be clear; that is 40,600 MILLION dollars.
Dr. Evil's head is spinning!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
64. Add $1 per gallon
People might actually use less. We might start to "Gasp" pay down the deby and have a currency thats worth something again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
65. Do those us with mixed feelings about the issue go to purgatory?
I agree with the theory with higher gas prices might lead to lower consumption which would be a good thing.

Here's the problem: Most of the wasted gas involves short trips. People get in their cars to go everywhere, even places that can be easily walked or biked to. And since the trip is short most people don't pause to consider how much it adds up. Half of my co-workers live as close to work as I do. They're all good liberals and none of them are rich. However, I'm the only one who bikes to work because there's not enough of an economic incentive to do otherwise. My motivation for biking isn't economic and there are days when I drive.

For my co-workers to seriously consider alternatives the price of gas would have to be about four or five times what it is now, and well, I'm opposed to that because I do enjoy the occasional road trip. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
66. It's true that they can bring the prices down, if we didn't pay for excessive profits. However,
oil prices will keep going up, so even if the gas companies stop ripping us off, we'll still be paying a shitload at the pump. Sorry. That's just a fact of life for all of us. My family and I have no choice but to drive, just like you, and these prices are killing us. But we can't change geology. The car companies can make cars much more fuel efficient, we can use diesel, we can slowly move toward electrification and biofuels, we can build some more mass transit infrustructure, etc. There are plenty of things we can do, but if you think that gas will ever be $2.00/gallon again, you're sadly mistaken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. I don't ever expect to see $2.00 gas again
but to think it should be priced higher to curb consumption is just ludicrous.
Maybe those people should just pay double when they fill up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
67. Well if the price of gas was too high
so many people wouldn't be going out and buying bigger and bigger vehicles would they? I personally think they are too high though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
69. Logically, a windfall profits tax is in order
as are higher gas prices.

Shortsighted Americans have doomed themselves- but more importantly, they've royally screwed over their children through cheap subsidized petroleum.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JosephSchmo Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
75. Short term it is painful, long term it is necessary
It takes thousands of years to create a drop of oil and only a fraction of second to use it. We are using oil faster than it is being created.

It will run out. This is a simple fact.

If we build our whole infrastructure around gas prices kept artificially low, then when the day comes that we must conserve it will be a pain much worse than a 50 dollar fill up.

I'm no expert on world oil supply, but a lot of smart people suggest that we have already peaked.

So the sooner we get our society to prepare for this, the better. That means driving more fuel efficient cars, living closer to work, growing food closer to where we live etc.

Keeping the price low (with our tax dollars) will not diminish the pain, only concentrate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #75
76. Raising the price is not the answer - Providing alternatives is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JosephSchmo Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #76
80. High price and looking for alternatives are very correlated
Why would anyone look for alternatives if gas was a buck a gallon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
77. If only my wages would climb as fast as gas prices...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
79. I think I am going to be sick....WHY AREN'T WE TAXING THOSE FUCKERS!?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
83. Enjoy it now, for in a few years you'll be lucky to afford a tank of gas
Make whatever adjustments you can now, because nothing is going to change the fact that the era of cheap oil is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC