Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CREW Files Justice and Senate Ethics Committee Complaints Against Sen. Mary Landrieu

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
gilpo Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:17 AM
Original message
CREW Files Justice and Senate Ethics Committee Complaints Against Sen. Mary Landrieu
http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/30690

8 Jan 2008 // Washington, D.C. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) today sent a complaint to the Department of Justice, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District for Louisiana and the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Texas, asking for an investigation into whether Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA) violated federal bribery law by including a $2 million earmark for Voyager Expanded Learning in a bill a mere four days after receiving $30,000 in campaign contributions from company executives and their relatives. CREW also asked the Senate Ethics Committee to investigate the matter.

Randy Best, a top Republican donor and Bush pioneer, founded Voyager, an educational products company and rather than selling the companys reading program to school districts, hired lobbyists to obtain earmarks for it. Although the House had appropriated $1 million for his program for the D.C. public schools, Best still needed a Senate sponsor. A lobbyist arranged a meeting with Sen. Landrieu, the chair of the Appropriations subcommittee responsible for the District of Columbia, to press for an earmark. Shortly after Sen. Landrieu met with Best, a member of Sen. Landrieus staff asked him to hold a fundraiser for her and he agreed. After the fundraiser, she received $30,000 in campaign contributions from individuals associated with the company -- donors who had never before contributed to her. Four days after she received the money, she inserted an earmark into a D.C. appropriations bill, giving D.C. schools $2 million to buy Bests reading program, which was unproven and had not been requested by the school system.

Federal law prohibits public officials from directly or indirectly demanding, seeking, receiving, accepting, or agreeing to receive or accept anything of value in return for being influenced in the performance of an official act. Accepting a contribution to a political campaign can constitute a bribe if a quid pro quo can be demonstrated.

Given that Sen. Landrieu asked Best to hold a fundraiser for her, which he did, and then inserted the Voyager earmark only four days after receiving contributions from individuals connected with the company, it certainly appears she traded the earmark for the contributions in violation of federal criminal law. Sen. Landrieu also may have violated the Senate rule prohibiting improper conduct which reflects upon the Senate.

Melanie Sloan, CREWs executive director, said today, Senator Landrieu appears to have traded a $2 million earmark for $30,000 in campaign contributions. It was a win-win situation for Best and Senator Landrieu, but a lose-lose for the taxpayers and D.C. school children. Sloan continued, the Department of Justice and the Senate Ethics Committee should look into this matter immediately. Members of Congress need to understand that trading earmarks for campaign funds is illegal -- no exceptions.

UPDATE:

Melanie Sloan, CREWs executive director, responds to Senator Landrieus release today on CREWs complaints (Sen. Landrieu's release is posted to the right):

Sen. Landrieus response to CREWs Department of Justice and Ethics Committee complaints fails to address the key allegation: that she inserted an earmark in return for campaign contributions. According to a document just provided by Sen. Landrieu, the District of Columbia apparently asked the senator on April 25, 2001 to include an earmark for Voyager in the D.C. appropriations bill. Nevertheless, by September 24, 2001, when a House committee included a $1 million earmark for Voyager, the company still had not attracted a Senate sponsor. Sen. Landrieu has not explained why she didnt follow through on the Districts request until November 6, 2001, four days after Mr. Best and his associates contributed $30,000 to the senators campaign.

***

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) is a non-profit legal watchdog group dedicated to holding public officials accountable for their actions.

For more information, please visit www.citizensforethics.org or contact Naomi Seligman Steiner at 202.408.5565/nseligman@citizensforethics.org .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. oh now that's interesting. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gilpo Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I thought so...
This is a pretty complex situation. Landrieu is part victim and part villian here. She is definately a casualty of Katrina in that her state was abandoned and she is trying by whatever means she can to get things going there. In this case, she may have gone too far, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_TN_TITANS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If I read right
the earmark had nothing to do with her state, only DC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gilpo Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good catch...
I wonder if they will uncover additional quids pro quo surrounding this....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boo Boo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Interesting that this Best guy is a Bush Buddy, and
Bush was griping about earmarks in his SOTU. That kinda seemed to come out of nowhere at the time. Sure would come in handy if there was some way for the Admin to read CREW's emails...

Me and my "active imagination" again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gilpo Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Things that make you go "hmmm...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 05th 2019, 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC