Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC To Appeal Judge's Decision To Let Kucinich Be In Debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:32 PM
Original message
MSNBC To Appeal Judge's Decision To Let Kucinich Be In Debate
olbermann said msnbc is appealing the decision or will appeal it.

ARGH!!!

"Update: Keith Olbermann just said on Countdown that MSNBC will appeal the decision to include Kucinich. Sounds like this isn't over."

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/msnbc/judge_forces_msnbc_to_include_dennis_kucinich_in_nevada_debate_74981.asp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. What is their fucking problem?? What reason did they give for un-inviting
Dennis to begin with?

The very fact they did that, can't reflect well on them -- this will reflect even more poorly. Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It's a "debate". You can't have anyone bringing up issues or ideas on a night like that.
It detracts from the real point: Seeing who has the best meaningless soundbite and who cries over not being called "likeable".

Can't have talk of working people or peace or justice taking time away from the important stuff like that.

:sarcasm:

I really hope Keith isn't BACKING MSNBC on this. He's better than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. ......
Why do we even bother researching candidates ourselves? Obviously the media knows better than we do who we want. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99th_Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Basically that they changed their minds (after Iowa & NH)
nothing more substantial than that...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Yeah, after I posted I looked it up and they just "changed the policy" -- from
the top four to the top three. Just 'cuz they wanted to, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. They can't take it that money does not buy them everything
What idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glimmer of Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. They are so ridiculous. This is not democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. That fucking piece of shit Chuck Todd is behind this.
Anti-Kucinich. Anti-Dean. It's obvious who he works for. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. olbermann talked to chuck todd and introduced him as
msnbc's "political" something-or-other, i forget. so that's what i was thinking or wondering...if it was chuck todd's decision to cut kucinich by changing the rules to the top 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Is this what the asshole looked like?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yep, that's the bastard
makes me ashamed of wearing a goatee. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. My concern is they won't play and the Judge says no debate.
Smells fishy to me! I want this debate to happen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Harry Reid and his son will be in tears if it gets canceled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That would put me over the edge for that Reid sonofabitch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think MSNBC is on strong legal footing for reversal.
They made an initial offer to include Kucinich in the debate based on the fact he had reached a pre-established threshold in the national polls. However in New Hampshire he dipped considerably below it and they rescinded the offer, which they should have every right to do.

The only possible argument Kucinich would have is an oral contract. A contract must have three parts:

1. Offer

2. Acceptance

3. Consideration


Since MSNBC was the controlling entity, they received no consideration from Dennis to consummate a binding contract. That would have been accomplished by his appearance in the debate. However, because MSNBC changed their mind based on criteria which had been previously set before the offer, the offer conditions were not met and the contract is simply being rescinded. I don't see any basis where a judge should have the right to dictate the conditions of the initial offer. Especially in the volatile sphere of politics and by an independent news organization.

There also must be a "meeting of the minds" in any contract. Both parties must clearly understand the terms of the contract and agree. It was Dennis who fell short of the contract 'terms' by his showing in New Hampshire. MSNBC initially was going to include him in the debate based on the assumption he would still maintain the necessary voter popularity criteria they had set as a minimum. He didn't.

I would be surprised if a higher court would not hold for MSNBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. Clinton gave them the right to repress news and debate
with his Telecommunications Act.

Thanks for that, corporate Dems all. Yay for repression! Yay and shut the fukkup! Yaaaaaay!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candymarl Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. What's the big deal?
He's still in the race. Let him speak. The M$M is at it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC