Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edmund Muskie cried -- really wept -- and look what happened to him...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:41 PM
Original message
Edmund Muskie cried -- really wept -- and look what happened to him...
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 08:44 PM by Radio_Lady
Can you recall why Muskie cried?

By the way, I erroneously applied that act to Mo Udall last night but I was TOTALLY wrong. Nobody picked it up except my husband, this morning, at breakfast.

Have the standards changed so much in all of these years? Women can cry and they get votes; men cry and they get dumped.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Muskie

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let's try... because he's human? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Getting serious: here is some info.
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 09:00 PM by jasmine621
CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: After that, Muskie became the favorite to win the 1972 Democratic Presidential nomination. But being the front-runner for over a year proved difficult. During the New Hampshire primary, Muskie choked with anger and seemed to cry because of a couple of nasty articles in the "Manchester Union Leader." One article proved to be a hoax. The other attacked Muskie's wife. Muskie then attacked publisher William Loeb.

EDMUND S. MUSKIE: (February 1972) By attacking me, by attacking my wife, he has proved himself to be a gutless coward. And maybe I said all I should on it. It's fortunate for him he's not on this platform beside me. A good woman--

CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT: The episode came to symbolize the collapse of Muskie's Presidential campaign because of the perception that he was weak. Muskie then went back to the Senate and headed the powerful Budget Committee until President Carter tapped him to be Secretary of State in 1980.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/remember/muskie_3-26.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought his family was defamed in some news coverage or something, and it upset him.
I was a little tot at the time but that's what I remember reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. i think someone shit talked about his wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. it was snow, not tears
or so one story goes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Manchester Union-Leader trashed his wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Actually, it was Nixon and the Canuck letter
saying Muskie had trashed Canadians and his wife was a drunk who swore. Later turned out Nixon's Ratfuckers were behind both attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Wasn't there also the suspicion that there was "something" on the letter itself
which triggered crying?

I thought that had also been discovered --- ?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here's a point of view from CBS News blog from yesterday:
Edited on Wed Jan-09-08 08:49 PM by Radio_Lady
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/01/07/politics/horserace/entry3684076.shtml

January 7, 2008, 5:35 PM

Choking Up In New Hampshire?

Posted by Vaughn Ververs

Video of Hillary Clinton's emotional response to an audience question in New Hampshire this morning is making its rounds on the Web and on TV. It was a rare moment for a candidate perceived as tough and robotic. During Saturday night's debate, Clinton looked hurt when asked by the moderator why Barack Obama is so well liked – and she isn't. "That hurts my feelings," she replied.

But that was a debate, what happened in her morning event was much more spontaneous. (You can read about the question and watch her response here). And it's the kind of event which will drive a lot of discussion going into the tomorrow's primary voting.

In 1972, Democratic presidential candidate Edmund Muskie stood in front of the offices of the Manchester Union Leader to mount a counter-offensive against the paper which had harshly attacked he and his wife, at times in personal ways. An emotional Muskie appeared to cry as he attacked the paper in defense of his and the episode has been credited for his campaign's collapse after New Hampshire – a state he won but badly underperformed his own expectations.

There is less chance that Clinton's "moment" will have such an impact on her campaign and could even work in her favor. Hillary Clinton, unlike her husband, has had trouble connecting to voters on a positive, emotional level. But Muskie's tears (he later said it was melting snowflakes on his cheeks) ran nearly ten days before the primary, giving it time to sink in. Today's response by Clinton won't go unnoticed by a long shot but also may not have a chance to marinate among voters.

More at link above ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. One of the most famous rat f*cking incidents of all time.
The Canuck Letter was a forged letter to the editor of the Manchester Union Leader, published 24 February 1972, two weeks before the New Hampshire primary of the 1972 United States presidential election. It implied that Sen. Edmund S. Muskie, a candidate for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination, held prejudice against Americans of French-Canadian descent. The letter's immediate effect was to compel the candidate to give a humiliating speech in front of the newspaper's offices, known simply as "the crying speech." The letter's indirect effect was the implosion of Muskie's candidacy.

In childish scrawl, and with poor spelling, the author claimed to have met Muskie and his staff in Florida. The author alleges to have asked Muskie how he could understand the problems of African Americans, given Maine's small black population. According to the letter, a member of Muskie's staff then responded, "Not blacks, but we have Canucks" — which the letter spells "Cannocks" — and Muskie laughed at the remark.

Washington Post staff writer Marilyn Berger reported that Nixon White House staffer Ken Clawson had bragged to her about authoring the letter. Clawson denied Berger's account. In October 1972, FBI investigators revealed that the Canuck Letter was part of the dirty tricks campaign against Democrats orchestrated by the Committee to Re-elect the President (CREEP). Loeb, the publisher of the Manchester Union Leader, maintained that the letter was not a fabrication. Loeb later admitted of some doubt, however, after receiving another letter claiming that someone had been paid $1,000 to write the Canuck Letter. The purported author, Paul Morrison of Deerfield Beach, Florida, was never found.

The discovery of the authorship of the letter is covered at length in the book and the film, All the President's Men.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canuck_Letter

see also Donald Segretti

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Segretti

Now, here is a fact I did not know

In 2000, Segretti served as co-chair of John McCain's presidential campaign in Orange County, California


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Very informative...thank you...
I was a kid at the time, but what I've read about it struck me as completely underhanded and nasty. The repukes true colors are difficult to hide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Donald Segretti is often let off the hook at having engaged in petty little tricks ---
let me just say that was all more than 35 years ago and we're all still trying to figure out
how we have been so deeply hurt by simple petty tricks ---

They weren't --- they were harmful, criminal acts which distorted our elections and stole them !!!

And, they're almost 40 years ahead of us in "ratfucking" --- !!!

While Dems seem to just still sit and watch it happening!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Because the Nixon White House set him up --- !!!
and that truth did finally come out ---

there is no place the right-wing disease has gotten to that they have won honestly --- !!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. Kerry wiped his eye in 2003
And they went on for days. I posted a picture of it the other day. I hope this is a one time incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. He still to this day claims it was snow landing on his face
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Champion Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. I thought it was the Ibogaine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-09-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. GWB has had tears and his eyes "well up" . He admits
I cry. There is nothing wrong with this. Men have been conditioned
to be more sensitive since then (Muskie's timee)

Guilliani admits he cries and there is nothing wrong with Hilary crying.

Grow up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC