Compare the issues and where the candidates stand-

[Faux pas]

http://www.selectsmart.com/president/2008.html

Mine came out with Kucinich #1 (he is my first choice).
Edwards, Clinton and Obama were were a 3 way tie for second (Edwards would be my second choice).

[laconicsax]

1. It says that there's a candidate who agrees with me 100%

I don't think that 'theoretical ideal candidate' is running though. Too bad.

[Faux pas]

3. I had the theoretical candidate thing too. I think it's probably

someone who doesn't exist. :)

[harmonicon]

2. funny

I've done a few of these things, with varying results. This one was new in that it said someone named Augustson was the best match (85%). I guess he's a green. Huh. I'll take it with a grain of salt though. This one was differed from the others in that Kucinich came in as #2 (83%), but Mike Gravel was last among the Dems - all the others he's come in as second. Thankfully all of the Dems were above all of the repubs, unlike in the online thing like this I did earlier today that said my best matches were Kucinich, Gravel and Paul - hah!

[Faux pas]

4. All the one's I've taken before comes out with Kucinich in the

number one position, no repubs anywhere near the top tier. I'm sure all these tests are skewed in some way, what is on the up and up now days? :)