Been watching the NH numbers all night long. Amazing that one candidate's % never varied.

[Bozita]

John Edwards started out with 17% of the vote with 3% of the precincts counted.

His percentage never varied. It never rose to 18%; never sank to 16.

Amazing in such a groundbreaking contest with a record number of voters, isn't it?

[Desertrose]

1. Are you implying our voting system could be compromised?

If you are, I couldn't agree more.

[ellisonz]

2. Heh...

John Edwards 47,803 16.9

http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/states/NH.html

[kerstin]

3. I thought that was strange too. n/t

[liberalla]

4. I noticed that...

17% . . . . a little weird

[anitar1]

5. Yes, smells like a fix. I waited quite some time for

the figure to change at least 1 percent.Never did.

[killbotfactory]

6. They stayed pretty much the same for everybody all night

[ThePhilosopher04]

11. No they did not. *

nm

[orleans]

7. i was noticing that too. kucinich went from 1 to 3 to 1 i think.

i never noticed edwards percent changing

[Maven]

8. ALL the candidates had pretty much the same percentages with minor variations

And if you look at the breakdown by county, the counties where Obama was expected to do the best (i.e., western NH, where the colleges are), he won decisively.

[AzDar]

9. I think I've seen this movie before....and the ending SUCKS!

[ThePhilosopher04]

10. I noticed the same thing...

very strange indeed. I would bet my house that this was a tainted vote.