Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is he Oboring at the debates and electrifying at speeches?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 01:13 PM
Original message
Why is he Oboring at the debates and electrifying at speeches?
He's going to have to fix this before he goes any further.

I don't think I'm the only one who noticed this. At the 2004 DNC I remember watching him and wishing he the one was running for President. He was so amazing.

Then he got into the race for '08. I remember that he was actually disappointing that first day in Illinois, but I blew it off and blamed it on the cold.

Then he got to the debates, and he was totally boring. His speech lacked fluidity, it was constantly stopping and starting. It's nice to think, but think before you start talking, not in the middle of your sentence.

How is he going to do this year in the Presidential debates against a far more hostile Republican?

At least he isn't Bill Richardson boring, but still someone needs to get with him and coach him on his debating technique. And fix the damn TelePrompTers next time, even Bush looks less ridiculous reading them.

This sort of superficial stuff is important, even though it was a great speech he gave in Iowa when he won, it looked fake because he was glued to the TelePrompTers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. The GOP meanies will eat him alive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Speeches are all about buzz words, debates are about substance,
Obama = buzz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No, I think he's thinking when he pauses.
That's what it looks like, but the problem is that he needs to learn to think while the other folks are talking, not when he's talking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Honestly, I think it's a simple matter of getting him some speech coaching
When I was watching him last night I realized that it's not the substance of what he says, it's that he stammers and uses to many "ahs". It's quite distracting when he's trying to make a serious point. It does tend to go away when he's passionate about something or clearly knows the subject in depth.

He speeches are so wonderful because he uses cadence. It's almost like singing. Most people who stutter don't when they sing.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. I don't watch the debates
so this is new to me.. It's about the whole the package not one aspect.. There were complaints about Edwards in his cheney debates and he's come a long way, obviously. The main thing is not to take any ill-advised rolling of the eyes and heavy sighing like paul begala gave Al Gore in the 2000 debates which I don't think Gore would do again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe his schedule. I understand he and Clinton did not have much sleep. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unapatriciated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Bush is tucked in by 9:00 every night...
What's his excuse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. None. Although I suspect he has watched those torture tapes before falling asleep. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. No, Sleep had nothing to do with it...
this is what I have been watching for a long time now. When they are debating the hesitations get on my nerves Edwards screaming and repeating the same thing over and over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. He gives thoughtful answers
Edited on Sun Jan-06-08 01:24 PM by killbotfactory
and doesn't just try to steer every answer into a rehearsed soundbyte.

I guess thats boring, but I like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. A Speech Can be Rehearsed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. For some reason, all of Onama's speeches bore me.
Even when people here report how scintillating ad exciting his speechifying is, when I watch those same speeches myself, all I hear is buzz-phrases and platitudes -- like: "when I go to Washington, I'm not going to be like those other politicians; I'm not going to forget that it is YOU I am working for, not the special interests. Because I believe in an America that represents ALL people -- black, white, brown, poor, rich, male and female. I believe in an America from the East Coast to the West Coast and all the coasts in between. And I believe in change. Not bad change, like higher gas prices, but good change like all the good changes I intend to make when I am your president."

And so on.

I agree he LOOKS good, and he delivers his speeches with wonderful vigor and passion. But so far he has left me thinking: "And?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. ...
"East Coast to the West Coast and all the coasts in between..."

OMG. Spot-on!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Applause! Wow, did you ever nail it!
"And I believe in change. Not bad change, like higher gas prices, but good change like all the good changes I intend to make when I am your president."


:rofl:

That's how he hits me, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. He and Edwards did well last night!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Everyone has different talents. Obama is unequalled on either side for his ability to deliver
electrifying oratory and INSPIRE with speeches.

Huckabee is the best overall at folksy, self deprecating humor.

I thought Obama was okay in the last debate, but you're right that it's not anywhere near the level of his speeches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. You just made me laugh my ass off
I was enthralled with Obama after his 2004 DNC speech, but I have also been dealing with the same "issues" with his inability to excite me like he did that day. "Oboring" :rofl: - that's hilarious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. Some people are not as good extemporaneously as with
planned and prepared materials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. Remember how Al Gore was declared to be "boring?"
The solution would be to respond to that: we need a President who thinks, and sometimes that is "boring." The President of the United States is not an entertainer. He's not supposed to have to entertain us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. What about the "bully pulpit" argument?
The President has little power unless he can convince people to work with him. This is especially true for Democrats who are a more fractured group (does the term "herding cats" ring a bell?) Charisma does matter IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. I thought that was Obama's strength
I need to watch him live more. I saw him on Oprah and thought he was fine and didn't notice these flaws.

But then we still need to harp on the fact that we don't have to have charisma so much as someone with substance. We're all suffering from the JFK Disease - we expect the President to be exciting and all that when what we need now is someone practical. We almost need less charisma, not more. We need boring Al Gore types who will get down to the job and do the job, so if Obama is accused of this, we need to take that line rather than worry about improving him on the surface.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
18. He may be good at regurgitating fluff that makes people feel warm and fuzzy
But he's obviously not good at answering hard questions with facts. That's where he stumbles and stutters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. You must have been watching black and listening black,
I don't think we both watched the same show, must have been distracted somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. WTF is "watching black and listening black"?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
21. He was calm and concise last night
That is how one is supposed to behave in a debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. I thought he was imperious and dismissive.
Edited on Sun Jan-06-08 04:30 PM by AmBlue
He dismissed entirely HRC's mention of a big pharma lobbyist as one of his campaign managers. Since his campaign won't answer questions about it today, for all we know he lied. He WILL have to answer this question as it's not going away.

Acting like a rock star and brushing off serious questions is not going to cut it. Also, the constant "uuuhhhs" and stuttering in debates is very distracting. It's easy to give a speech with a teleprompter. Thinking on your feet, coming up with meaningful answers, and being eloquent at the same time, not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
34. This was the first time..
but I could still what makes me change the channel when he begins speaking, this is the first time I didn't change the channel... I enjoyed watching the repugs beating up phony ass Romney. I found out that I don't like Thompson and Ghouliani even more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. How many hours & how many speech writers help with Obamas speeches?
Edited on Sun Jan-06-08 02:09 PM by TheGoldenRule
It's obviously not coming from him spontaneously.

No substance there, just the glitter of Oprahs billions behind him. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
23. Cynicism is never going to end
as long as their are people out there that feels they are superior to others it will never end,

your post is "dull complacence"

I suppose DU is infected with it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Didereaux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
24. he reads better on his feet than he thinks. Not a plus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. His off-the-cuff quips aimed at Clinton have been brilliant
The man can think on his feet very well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. I think he eats better on his feet, too.
With lobbyists, that is. I can't believe he brought that up in defense of lobbyists!! And I'm glad Charlie Gibson called him on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
26. TelePrompTers or not at least he writes his own
speeches, they are his words.

When he debates he reminds me of many professors who are answering a question they aren't use to, thinking and not just speaking. Sound bytes aren't his thing for sure.

I don't think he's boring so I've never thought of "why is he boring"

He'd do better in a two person debate where he can answer in more than a 30 second blip. Despite fatigue last night if you could hear through your boredom I thought his answers were mostly quite good. He is getting more comfortable as he goes along. He won't have a problem come debates with the republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
31. American Idol syndrome
rehearsals, carefully picked clothing, lighting and an audience packed with cheering shills can make anyone look *scintillating*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-06-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. right, because no other candidate rehearses, oicks out their
clothing carefully or has cheering supporters/shills.

Only Obama. How devious.
The others just give their big speeches impromptu after picking out their clothes at random and then refuse to let their supporters in lest their cheers be taken as coming from shills. They are naturals.

Man that Obama is very sneaky. Of course some things were easy like when he duped all those dumb Harvard law students into electing him president of the Law review...and the dumb voters from his district that gave him 11 years in the Legislature. And those DUMB students in Chicago where he taught constitutional law for 10 years. They were so stupid that he duped them into giving him the 2nd best evaluations of any of the professors ever. Not just that when he became a state Senator and they still wanted him to teach even though he is an empty suit, all fluff he duped them into going into the class very late Fridays and very early Mondays just because that was the only time he could fit. Maybe that is law students favorite class time? Oh I know, the class was always filled with schills.

What a crock he must be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC