Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Lawyers Discussed Fate of C.I.A.Tapes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 11:16 AM
Original message
Bush Lawyers Discussed Fate of C.I.A.Tapes
there is that name again David Addington, when is this guy going to get his just dues, Cheney's little pet.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/19/washington/19intel.html?ei=5065&en=a18c439b7e8f7bc2&ex=1198731600&adxnnl=1&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print&adxnnlx=1198080438-5iFm6Oti4VwR2KD5+9VS/g

just a snip of the article.

At least four top White House lawyers took part in discussions with the Central Intelligence Agency between 2003 and 2005 about whether to destroy videotapes showing the secret interrogations of two operatives from Al Qaeda, according to current and former administration and intelligence officials.

The accounts indicate that the involvement of White House officials in the discussions before the destruction of the tapes in November 2005 was more extensive than Bush administration officials have acknowledged.

Those who took part, the officials said, included Alberto R. Gonzales, who served as White House counsel until early 2005; David S. Addington, who was the counsel to Vice President Dick Cheney and is now his chief of staff; John B. Bellinger III, who until January 2005 was the senior lawyer at the National Security Council; and Harriet E. Miers, who succeeded Mr. Gonzales as White House counsel.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Krashkopf Donating Member (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-19-07 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Addington is no "little pet . . ."
Edited on Wed Dec-19-07 11:44 AM by Krashkopf
He is the evil legal mastermind behind Darth Cheney's throne.

Remember in many cases - Mussolini's Italy and Nazi Germany being the two prime examples - FASCISTS and AUTHORITARIANS come to power through LEGAL means.

And I REJECT, in advance, any "Godwin's Rule" objections that may be forthcoming. "Godwin's Rule" does not make any statement as to whether any particular reference or comparison to Hitler or the Nazis might be appropriate. It only says that the longer a debate goes on, the more likely it becomes that someone will make a comparison to Hitler or the Nazi's

In this case, I am NOT making the comparison to FASCISTS and AUTHORITARIANS to be inflammatory, I am making it because it is apt.

"Impeach. Prosecute. Save America!" - Naomi Wolf

Krash

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC