Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RCMP restricts Taser use

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 02:48 PM
Original message
RCMP restricts Taser use
RCMP restricts Taser use

Stun guns have been used inappropriately, commissioner admits as he announces new rules


OTTAWA–The RCMP says it's restricting when its officers can use their Tasers, admitting that the stun guns have been used inappropriately on suspects in the past.

Front-line Mounties were issued a new edict yesterday saying that weapons can be used only on people who are "combative" or "actively resistant."

As well, the new policy says it's "not appropriate" to deploy a Taser on a person who resists only through "passive" physical actions and "verbal refusal to respond to lawful commands."

"The changes ... make it clear that in certain instances, including I would say instances where the Taser has been used in the past, it's not appropriate to use a Taser," RCMP Commissioner William Elliott told a news conference yesterday.

The force moved quickly to enact the new policy just days after a police watchdog urged the Mounties to immediately restrict their use to cases where an individual is "combative" and is at risk of killing or injuring himself or a police officer.

It's nice to see news like this every now and again. This will give us the leverage we need to force the adoption of similar guidelines by provincial and municipal police forces across Canada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good, nice to see that some law enforcement are getting this. Rec!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Way to go, eh?
Edited on Sun Dec-16-07 03:03 PM by BushDespiser12
Now if we could learn a little bit from our more civilized neighbor...

K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-16-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's kinda sad that such "new edicts" are even necessary, but at least it's in place NOW. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC