Ed Schultz was just quoting Harry Reid saying Iraq is a bigger blunder than Vietnam

[Quixote1818]

Then Ed said: "I agree with Harry, so why aren't we cutting off funding then?"

I am sometimes luke warm to Ed but I have to agree with him on this.

[madinmaryland]

1. Thanks for this.

Big Eddie manages to get the biggies on from the Dem party quite a bit. Glad to hear him saying this!!

[hlthe2b]

2. and then he went on to back the administrations' every claim

on Iran and their supposed role in providing weapons materials to Iraq--even though the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staffs has denied, as have many in the intelligence community.

This is my problem with Ed.. He does not inform himself well at all and thus his callers quite frequently leave him in the dust. Then, he gets defensive...:eyes:

[walldude]

3. "He does not inform himself" Bingo!!!

This is my problem with Ed as well. He does no research at all. He argues against Republican talking points without even bothering to see if they are true or not. He spent days defending Pelosi for her "right to choose whatever plane she needs" when the fact was she had no say in what transportation they provide for her. Even after Tony Snow said it was not up to her and it was a non story, Ed continued to "fight for Pelosi" :eyes: This is one example of a long stream of this type of Shultz "debate".

[Quixote1818]

4. I agree. I posted the OP but I was dumbfounded at some of the other things

he was saying.

[Ganja Ninja]

5. Now he's telling everyone to swallow the Iran lies like it's

accepted fact. A true left winger he ain't.

[patrice]

6. That statement pleases both polarities in his audience.

RW wants "proof" that the LW hates the Troops.
LW wants a "show of strength" agains the RW.