Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some last wild speculation about the Paul/Kucinch flirtation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 01:35 AM
Original message
Some last wild speculation about the Paul/Kucinch flirtation
which is now officially dead - in case you haven't got the memo.

Just thinkin' out loud here..

Could it be that Dennis floated this Paul idea with no actual intention of working w/Ron Paul whatsoever?

Could it be that Dennis knew that a great many Ron Paul supporters are young ill-informed anti-war and anti-imperialist Interneters?

Could it be that Dennis wanted to draw out a discussion of his views versus Paul's views on issues facing America?

Could it be that Dennis suspected that a sizable chunk of Paul supporters could be peeled off for himself upon closer examination of the libertarian kook factor?

Could it be that Dennis felt the potential backlash from inbred inside-baseball Democratic activists was worth the trade-off for the extra exposure on the edges of the blogosphere and the alternative media?

Could there be more of a method to Dennis' brilliance than many on DU even grasp?

Could I be completely wrong? Possible, wouldn't be the first time. But who knows....

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'd like to think you're right, but I've yet to see a calculating bone in Kucinich's body. That
said, he still has my vote in the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, I think I'm wrong too
but sometimes ya just gotta toss it out there :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Link to the official deadness?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Read this post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. It's not a dead issue to me.
He and his wife said it was a possibility. You can't un-ring a bell.

Even if Ron Paul never ends up as his running mate this episode shows that Kucinich might very well hand a great deal of power to this or another of the enemy. How about Ron Paul as the head of the Social Security Administration? Or ambassador to the UN? I'm not interested in helping elect a Democrat who would just turn around and empower the very ones I had worked to defeat.

I guess you could say it is a dead issue for me in one respect: I have turned the page on Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think he was trying to rub up on RP's mojo
It blew up in his face.

It's too bad. I really like him (and Dodd and Gravel), and I have a grudging respect for Ron Paul because he defied his own party to cosponsor Koochy's House Resolution to rescind IWR.

But damn...this is so embarassing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yes.
K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. no, no, no, no, no,
yes, absolutely,
yes


my final answers.
dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stimbox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. Here's the clip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. I think he was feeling out the political landscape.
Edited on Fri Nov-30-07 02:24 AM by lvx35
And thinking about a power play that could bring a lot of Republicans over to our side. It may have been a little too bold...but boldness is what Dennis does, that's how he plays and I still like him for it!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
10. I Have Run Out of Candidates
Edited on Fri Nov-30-07 02:54 AM by AndyTiedye
Whatever that was, it does not inspire great confidence.

I was gonna vote for DK (if Al Gore doesn't get into the race).

Now I think I'm just gonna write in Gore.

draft gore


(yes, I'll vote for the Democratic nominee in the general election, yawn)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 04:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. If Al Gore doesn't get into the race?
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. No
Kucinich made a severe error of judgement, and seriously considered Ron Paul as his running mate before Ron Paul shot it down. I hope Kucinich has learned why it was a bad idea to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 05:04 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. When and where did Dennis ever suggest Paul as his running mate??
He mentioned a possibility of a cabinet position. Bill Clinton, who is considered the second coming (please no blue dress jokes) of Christ by some on this board, had at least one blatant Republican in his cabinet, and several DLC Dinos who might as well have been. And that Republican went on to LIE to the United Nations and helped drag us into a useless and illegal war which is literally killing this country. Not to mention Iraq. And yet Hillary has said she would have that warmongering liar on her team again.

Paul, for all his faults, at least opposes this PNAC treason. Where the Hell is the condemnation for the Clintons and their open association with war criminals? Let's be consistent here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Right here
http://blog.cleveland.com/openers/2007/11/kucinich.mp3

Yes, you're right that other candidates aren't perfect either, but this thread is about Kucinich. I feel that his considering of Ron Paul as his running mate to be a severe error of judgement, and hopefully one which he has learned from.

I don't feel that Ron Paul's anti-PNAC stance is enough to rehabilitate him, since he is political soul mate of a nasty cast of characters who are on fascist far-right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. What about covering for the crimes of bush and Cheney?
Shouldn't that be considered a serious error of judgement? At least Dennis isn't responsible for any of damage or the danger we continue to face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Pee Wee Herman isn't responsible for the damage either.
Does that mean he should be our next president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Anarcho-Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Absolutely
But this thread topic is about Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. I think he did.
There is no such thing as a Perfect Candidate. They are all human and will all make mistakes and will all disagree with you on something.

Some make honest mistakes, some make fishy mistakes, some make crooked mistakes.

I'll take Honesty.

Go, Dennis!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
15. Why does it matter?
Kucinich is polling at 2%. He's never going to get the chance to pick a running mate.

I honestly don't understand how this ever became an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. Thanks for contributing MF.
Did you know Hillary is BatBoy's mom? Scary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. A little of D), a little of E). n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
17. Dennis doesn't have to calculate. When you speak truth, you always win.
The *top tier* got there by meticulous calculating. I'm not sure they even know how to speak honestly.

You can never lose when your honest.


Good to have Kooch back!

Go, Dennis!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
19. It was a way to get his stands out there
that otherwise might not be as visible. Invisibility of certain candidates and key issues is a method of political machines and their undue influence on the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
20. Could It Be Dennis Just Isn't Snow Freaking White?
Just askin' ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. No, that's not possible,
and you must be a DLC plant of a Freeper troll for having the audacity to imply such a thing.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Thank you--I've been thinking that for years--and he was my primary candidate in '04.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. That Or ...
a former Howard Dean supporter :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. ...
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. Of course
Nobody is. But he's better than most of the creeps we get stuck with as politicians. That's all I ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
30. Whatever it was, he lost me. For me, back to supporting Edwards.
That is all.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled Dennis is God channel.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
31. No. They were asked questions - and answered carelessly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Exactly. Kucinich is still who he was a week ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. True. And I am relieved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-01-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
34. IMHO, you're right
He's always been a very savvy campaigner.

He may also have seen it as an opportunity to stir up controversy among the GOP candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC