Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hagel on Bush WH: ‘most arrogant, incompetent’ ever.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 10:21 AM
Original message
Hagel on Bush WH: ‘most arrogant, incompetent’ ever.

Hagel on Bush WH: ‘most arrogant, incompetent’ ever.

Yesterday in an address to the Council on Foreign Relations, Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE) stepped up his rhetoric against the Bush administration, calling it one of the most “incompetent” in history:

Hagel, who considered running for the GOP presidential nomination as an antiwar candidate, told the foreign policy experts that he would give the Bush administration “the lowest grade of any I’ve known.”

“I have to say this is one of the most arrogant, incompetent administrations I’ve ever seen or ever read about,” Hagel said, according to our colleague Robert Kaiser, who attended the speech. In case his audience didn’t get the point, Hagel also said: “They have failed the country.”


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Whoa. Tell us how you really feel, Chuck--don't hold back.
Edited on Thu Nov-29-07 10:30 AM by wienerdoggie
edit to add: here's the real kicker, from the WaPo article: "Then Hagel went to dinner with New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, the recently turned independent who has toyed with the idea of a Bloomberg-Hagel presidential ticket."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Golly, and it only took him 6 years to say it
BushCo have been "incompetent and arrogant" since day one, but Chuckie Boy is some kind of frickin' hero for understating the obvious NOW???? Color me so very underwhelmed. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Naw, he's been saying this sort of thing for a long time.
He really hates Chimpy. He used to try to hide it and be more diplomatic, but now that he's retiring, he just doesn't give a fuck anymore. Recall that he was one of the first politicians to wonder aloud if Chimpy would be impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. His Congressional voting record says otherwise
Hagel has voted in line with BushCO demands something like 94% of the time, for 6+ years. I'm completely unimpressed with his criticisms after he has supported GOP legislation right down the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. He votes like a conservative Republican from Nebraska, which is what he is, so
his record is what I would expect. But he has broken with the Chimp on numerous occasions in terms of foreign policy--voted against Kyl-Lieberman, voted for timetables to end the war, voted to restore habeas corpus, co-sponsored a bill to close Gitmo, voted no-confidence on Gonzo, voted to make public some intelligence documents that made Chimpster look bad. Also stuck up publicly for Al Gore and Max Cleland. So he has somewhat of a conscience in some areas, but is a typical mean Republican on things like SCHIP and minimum wage (he's my Senator, and those votes really pissed me off). He's an odd critter and a mixed bag, but he is what he is. I do appreciate his willingness to say what he thinks, no holding back or weasel words. And he will forever be my hero (as a military wife) for vocally, loudly opposing the war for several years now, at great cost to his political career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Still no sale
His opposition to the war has cost him nothing but has evidently garnered accolades from supposed liberals who should be seeing him for what he actually is: an unapologetic member of a thoroughly discredited political party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I'm not trying to make a sale--I'm just summing up what
I've gathered (as a constituent) from his Senate career. He's done some things I applaud, and many things I disagree with. If you lived in Nebraska, you would see that his outspokenness on the war and on Chimpy/Cheney has cost him dearly in terms of his reputation in this state--he supports (and is friends with) Mike Johanns, but knows Johanns doesn't want him to campaign for him in the Senate race, because Hagel is toxic in Nebraska. His own mentor, John McCollister (a Congressman from Nebraska whom Hagel used to work for) has publicly lambasted him in the newspapers here for speaking out against Chimpy. If Hagel had kept his mouth shut on the war, he might have been the Repub nominee--he was almost a VP pick for Chimpy in 2000. Hagel knows that being a maverick gets you nowhere in the GOP--he co-chaired John McCain's campaign--but he spoke up anyway. So yes, it cost him. Now I agree with you that if he were REALLY principled, he's leave the GOP--but just like he was too spineless to run for Prez, he's too spineless to give up his party affiliation and stand alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thank you for sharing the info
and I agree with your last sentence. I could admire and applaud him if he left the GOP and never looked back, as did Jim Webb and a few others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Chuckie poo must have early-onset alzheimers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. ????
What he said in that 2003 short interview is notinconsistent with what he says now. The specifics of the situation have of course changed, but not the general principles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wow!
He sounds like Kucinich, McCain, or Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. oooo, tough words
would have helped back in 2002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. Good for Hagel
I'm glad he's dumping the Grand Oil Party/Gross Old Perverts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
satya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
11. Just remember, Hagel, it was your voting machines that helped put him there. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBUSA Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Applies to the Repub party as well.
A coup occurred on their watch. A terrorist attack occurred on their watch.
The Republican party failed to protect our Constitution . They let a group of ideological misfits take over portions of our government in order to realign the world politics.
The Republican party can not protect our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jacksonian Donating Member (699 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. damn right
and very succinctly put. The Republican party can't protect anything but their own asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
live love laugh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. Hagel's voting machines put Hagel there too which is why this is meaningless. nt/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. that would be a no-confidence vote for Condi - Sec of State and Nat Security Advisor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. K&R.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. You've got to hand it to Hagel
for speaking out against these guys. As a Republican, he must be pretty lonely in expressing these views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. Then why did your party release this scourge upon our nation Chucky?
nice try at "distancing" though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
20. Good for you Chuck! As an enabler during the 2000 election with Diabold,
you must be really regretting the "whole enchalada"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #20
36. He and Sandra Day O'Connor. n/t
Edited on Fri Nov-30-07 05:05 AM by tblue37
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
21. Can you blame him for distancing himself from Bush...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
23. This should be said every day by the opposition party. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. how about the MSM simply reporting what other Repubs are saying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
24. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Hagel: would consider a Dem ticket.
He is fishing for a new job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Va Lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
26. This needs to be in a campaign commercial next year
Whoever our nominee is, this needs to be run in all markets next year. Might wake up a few repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. He could be our Zell Miller! Why in the hell are so many
Edited on Thu Nov-29-07 07:19 PM by doc03
bashing the guy? I would like to see some Democrats with the balls to tell it like it is. When I heard Zell Miller and heard peoples reaction to it I knew it was over for Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. I'd welcome him as a Democrat. We'd just have to brainwash him
a little, maybe make a continuous-loop audiotape for him--"SCHIP is good for American children...people deserve a minimum wage...women deserve the right to choose..." His brother is a big-time, proud, liberal Democrat, by the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. I don't know about that...
I kind of like his brain, works pretty well... Those SCHIP votes were tough to swallow though... somaybe your idea is not so bad after all :-).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
27. Link to the transcript
http://www.cfr.org/publication/14895/conversation_with_chuck_hagel_rush_transcript_federal_news_service.html?breadcrumb=%2Fpublication%2Fby_type%2Ftranscript

Lots of interesting stuff, not all of it incendiary (that part is mostly in the Q&A towards the end). The Q&A is not only full of red meat, but also quite entertaining, seems like Hagel had a bit of fun. Just one quote, no time for more

QUESTIONER: Hi. My name is Nancy Lieberman. Is there any Republican candidate for president or former Republican potential candidate for president which has a foreign policy consistent -- philosophy consistent with your own or even close to your own?

HAGEL: Well, to be fair to these candidates, they've been put in these awkward formats. It's kind of like the poor man's Gong Show. (Laughter.) And I would far prefer -- and I think most Americans if you're interested -- to give each candidate five minutes and say, "Okay, Senator or Governor, Congressman, tell us what your foreign policy is and would be for the next four years." Take any dimension of that or, "What is your policy regarding America's competitive role in the world, our declining dollar? Should we intervene? Should we not intervene? How do you stop that? How can you stop it?" And so on and so on.

Whether these glancing blows, smart-ass, kind of glib answers that a bunch of wise-ass consultants get together and they put in the minds of all these candidates -- "Now, you want to get this one in. This will be a zinger on old Mitt. Wait until he gets that one." (Laughter.) You know, and, "Here's a good one for Rudy. You know, ask him about all the wives," and so on. (Laughter.)

I mean -- and so America and the world is sitting out there -- "Well, I don't know. Does that have anything to do with what the next set of challenges are?"

And so I -- to your question about who is in my opinion closest to my foreign policy, John McCain is the only one that I -- of the candidates that I've worked closely with -- of the Republicans. Now, Joe Biden -- I'm very close to Joe Biden's philosophy about foreign policy. I suppose of all the candidates out there, including McCain, I'm probably closer to Joe Biden's. And I think Biden would be a very good president. I think Joe Biden would be a very good secretary of State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. LOL!--good stuff. "Wise-ass"--he sure does swear a lot--even in formal speeches
and on the Senate floor. He must not have gotten the 'ol bar of soap often enough as a kid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-29-07 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. You know what?
I did not even noticxe it! What will you think now of MY language :-)!

Has he used similar language on the floor? Did not know that, kind of fun...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-30-07 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
35. Ya think?
Add one more Captain Obvious to the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC