Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Special right," my ass. Obama said on the 700 Club that

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:01 PM
Original message
"Special right," my ass. Obama said on the 700 Club that
Edited on Mon Nov-26-07 03:13 PM by rateyes
gay spouses have the INHERENT right, not a "SPECIAL RIGHT" to visit their spouse in the hospital, and that ALL people, gay or straight, should be treated EQUALLY. And, OMG, I'll bet that some gay spouses who visit their husband/wife in the hospital might actually be "prayerful" about their spouse's condition!! :sarcasm:

Again, I'm not voting for Obama, but those who want to jump on him for using the word "prayerful" need to give it a rest. That's as intolerant as the fundies are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Would you be so understanding if Hillary had said it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, I would.
I'm not voting for either one of them. Much ado about nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. If Obama truly believes this --
-- why isn't he in favor of same-sex marriage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I don't know. I didn't know he wasn't.
Same reason, I suppose, that Hillary supported The Defense of Marriage Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Why are you bringing up Hillary?
What does she have to do with this discussion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Because it was a Hillary supporter,
who was blasting Obama in another thread. I don't think it to be inconsistent to be opposed, in general, to gay marriage, while at the same time recognizing a gay marriage and the rights of gay married couples to be treated the same as heterosexual married couples.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. I think it's damned inconsistent.
Is it an inherent right or not? Are we equal citizens or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. It's not but the difference between personal belief and public policy.
Citizens have the right to disagree and are expected to uphold the law. During these endlessly expensive (and profitable) campaigns, those lines get all fouled up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. Sorry.
He's talking out both sides of his mouth here.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Oh, I agree. I was just pointing out that a person
could disagree with equality but also, uphold the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Hillary doesn't support DOMA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. He is against same sex MARRIAGE-but for civil unions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Then he doesn't really believe in equality.
Only candidate that does , it seems, is Dennis Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
41. His church performs same sex marriages
He isn't against them, he just thinks the rights can be extended through civil unions quicker, that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. The fact is that many, many people seek inspiration and solace through prayer.
It makes no sense to ignore those voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. Inspiration and Solace are just fine.
They get that in the local UCC church, along with LGTB members and joint prayer services with the Flint Islamic center.

There's nothing wrong with being religious. There IS something VERY WRONG with being "religious" and a stinking bigot using that belief for cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. Should he take a meeting with a leader of a country that executes gay people?
In other words, as a candidate, he should not talk to Americans who disagree with him; but as president (or even as a candidate), he should talk to the leaders of countries who disagree with him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. THAT country is not THIS country.
There's a difference here. Of course the leader of this nation would have to speak with leaders of other and hostile nations: he or she just doesn't have to go on their version of the "Today" show for coffee and donuts and smoozing.

HAVING to talk to Kim Jong Il is something you hold your nose and do. Going on "The 700 Club" when the person who runs that show made it clear he thinks GOD almost wiped NOLA off the map because of Gay People is bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. You said it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. 700 Club? Fox News all full up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. what's wrong with 'prayerful'?
I've known two lesbians who were deeply, and I mean *deeply* religious (I dated one of them, and attended church services with her for the first time since I wore a size 6X) and I don't think it's a terribly shocking thing to say. To each their own, and there are active GLBT faith groups in all religions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Nothing wrong with it...
I should have used the :sarcasm: smilie. I'll make the edit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. gotcha....
Okay, here's my take on this: I'm glad he's going on programming such as the hateful, intolerent 700C and knocking down the 'special rights' nonsense. If it makes even one person in the viewing audience actually stop and think it's not a bad thing.

I want a president who can lay the groundwork for my civil rights. And I think that's what he's doing. Fine by me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. What was he doing on the 700 Club?
He's going for the intolerant vote now?

Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. yes, I had the same question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I don't know...
I guess he figures that evangelicals vote. Probably the same reason other Democratic candidates attend Catholic fundraisers, or suck up to people like Rupert Murdoch. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Between this and Sanchez giving the Democratic address last time
I just feel like shaking someone. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. I feel like SLAPPING someone.
If Obama wants to appeal to some off the wall fringe group, why doesn't he declare as a Republican and get it over with?

Hell, if he did THAT, Hillary Clinton couldn't get elected dog catcher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. I know evangelicals who think the 700 Club is for morons.
I'm sorry, but Obama is digging a hole that I won't join him in.

Pat Robertson is the guy who said that Katrina was punishment for toleration of homosexuality. Barack Obama has gone from lying down with the dogs to just lying down in their shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 04:08 AM
Response to Reply #20
49. I think it was that other guy who died a while ago
whose name I can't remember that said Katrina was punishment for homosexuality---not Pat Robertson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. If not specifically, then generally:
From one of the "sites which shall not be named" for Robertson's views on such things:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46737

I won't cut and paste, and you really don't have to go there: same ol' song and dance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. There's a huge difference between Catholics and fundies
You can't compare Dems campaigning at Catholic fundraisers to pandering to Pat Robertson and ex-gay ministries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Not a huge difference when it comes to
gay rights and abortion rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Well, the Catholic Church doesn't believe homosexuality is a sin
Edited on Mon Nov-26-07 03:28 PM by LostinVA
Nor do they believe it can be changed.

That's a pretty big difference.

Plus, many Catholics disagree with the official stance of the Church hierarchy. The same can't be said for fundies. When I got married, most of the guests were Catholic. My grand-FIL is even head of the Knights of Columbus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. I must have missed the memo....
http://www.americancatholic.org/News/Homosexuality/default.asp

They think abortion is a sin. And, I'm pretty sure that they are opposed to "the social acceptance of homosexuality and same-sex relationships.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. American Catholic is a weird spin-off of the Catholic Church
And I stand by what I said earlier, MOST Catholics do not agree with the the official stance of the Church hierarchy. I don't think it's a coincidence that the most liberal states with the most rights for gays are predominantly Catholic states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #24
46. Oh REALLY? Why did the Catholic Church abandon orphans rather than let gays adopt?
Edited on Tue Nov-27-07 12:36 AM by Hoof Hearted
Hmmmmmmmm?

In a stunning turn of events, Archbishop Sean P. O'Malley and leaders of Catholic Charities of Boston announced yesterday that the agency will end its adoption work, deciding to abandon its founding mission, rather than comply with state law requiring that gays be allowed to adopt children.

The Rev. J. Bryan Hehir, president of Catholic Charities of Boston, and Jeffrey Kaneb, chairman of the board, said that after much reflection and analysis, they could not reconcile church teaching that placement of children in gay homes is ''immoral" with Massachusetts law prohibiting discrimination against gays.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/03/11/catholic_charities_stuns_state_ends_adoptions/

What a bunch of shite.

Edit to add: This is the tip of the fuckin' iceberg, but of course most people already know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #24
51. Isn't it as long as you don't DO anything about it?
Sort of like it's ok to be gay as long as you're celibate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. It's an odd catch-22
You're not supposed to do anything about, because it's sex outside of marriage and they don't recognize gay marriage.

That being said, I know priests who personally disagree with the Church's stance on gay marriage. Haruka and I were going to have a Catholic priest read at our wedding. He's a family friend of Haruka's. Unfortunately, he couldn't come because of a severe illness in the family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #52
53. If it were me, I'd just ask God to speak up if he objects.
Just being silly, Lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. He's BEEN going for the intolerant vote
If he wasn't, he wouldn't have given a speaking platform to an ex-gay clown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I was hoping that was just a really stupid mistake.
The sight of politicians parsing with the lives of others is beyond disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
29. Pay close attention to what he's doing.
He's turning their own coded language on its end. Yeah, it's a bit dishonest, but it's the best rhetorical strategy for getting through to these numbskulls, if there's any hope of it at all. Heads will explode over this. I can feel it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Obama seems to understand the first rule of politics...
to win, you have to get at least one more vote than your opponent.

I don't fault him for what he's doing. I'm still not voting for him, nor Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. I think for him, it's more than just politics.
It's mission driven. He's inserting himself right smack in the middle of the culture wars - not accidentally. And he's approaching it in a way we've never seen before. Trust me on this - he's attempting something huge and incredably gutsy, here.

and I'm not voting for him, either, but he's earning major points in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. If so,
I hope he continues, win or lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #29
40. My god, how is it dishonest?
He went right into the 700 Club and supported gay rights, and a woman's right to an abortion.

The only numbskulls I see are the ones at DU who don't understand that he's turning the fundie world right on its head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
39. Obama was on the 700 club? REALLY? The 700 club?
Jesus Christ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
43. If he really thinks all people should be treated equally
He should come out for full marriage equality. Funny how he says "gay spouses" when, under his plan for a fair and just system, there'd be no such thing.

If not, he's just another bullshit talking centrist pandering and talking out of both sides of his mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. Remember, though, gays are "a statistically insignificant portion of the general population."
Edited on Mon Nov-26-07 11:32 PM by Bluebear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-26-07 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Oh I forgot
There are more phobes than queers, so he doesn't need our votes to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
47. Because we have a sound-bite driven media, here is my sound-bite on the subject:
Special rights? Shame on you! They're ALWAYS special rights when someone else wants them; It's only when WE want them that they become 'civil' rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
48. I've lost interest I once had for Obama, but I agree this has been blown entirely out of proportion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
54. OK, I'll jump on him for it
This is not a criticism of people of faith but I'm pretty sick of candidates making sure to wear the crosses on their sleeve and out-Jesus each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC