|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Locut0s (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:00 AM Original message |
Do you think there is any risk of an assassination attempt if... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:03 AM Response to Original message |
1. Yes, as with any Presidential candidate That is why they have security precautions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Locut0s (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:06 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Certainly that's the case. However I did think that they might face more of a risk because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:06 AM Response to Original message |
2. Not as long as they continued on a corporatist path |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:09 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Clinton didn't. Reagan did. Not every assassination is part of the Evil Corporatist Conspiracy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:13 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. You do know that Neil Bush had dinner the night before the Reagan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:15 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. So Bush tried to kill Reagan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:16 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Make up your own mind. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:17 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. I'm not asking what I should think. I'm asking what you're saying. Yes or no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:18 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. I don't HAVE to answer anything to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:20 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I already have. I'm asking what you believe. Did George Bush try to kill Ronald Reagan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:23 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. And...I am refusing to answer you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:25 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. I doubt you could find three issues we disagree on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 04:00 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. I'm curious, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 11:50 AM Response to Reply #20 |
39. As with most conspiracy theorists, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 04:49 PM Response to Reply #39 |
54. Not at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Basileus Basileon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 06:33 PM Response to Reply #54 |
56. And yet you are unable to find a scrap of evidence that our political persuasions are different. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-25-07 03:53 PM Response to Reply #56 |
59. Unwilling and unable are two different things. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:24 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. edit. dupe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 12:39 PM Response to Reply #7 |
46. Close. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conspirator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 07:20 AM Response to Reply #4 |
26. Bill Clinton tried to fight lobbies, but in the end surrendered to corporations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Locut0s (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:10 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. I was thinking more of the risk from radical racist / religious groups. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:25 AM Response to Reply #2 |
15. Some guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvccd1000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:26 AM Response to Reply #2 |
17. Clinton didn't venture onto too many military bases. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:26 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Clinton did just fine with the military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sasquatch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 04:17 AM Response to Reply #18 |
21. I guess some of them equate "over-spending" with "stromg defense" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvccd1000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 06:37 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. I'm not suggesting that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 07:07 AM Response to Reply #22 |
25. Your facts just seem to be wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvccd1000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 10:29 AM Response to Reply #25 |
37. Only speaking from experience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 05:58 PM Response to Reply #37 |
55. A question of origin |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 08:34 AM Response to Reply #22 |
33. Gut the military? The Cold War ended. No reason to keep spending 400+ billion/year on defense anymor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvccd1000 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 10:25 AM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Yep, gut the military. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selatius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 10:47 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. What else could have Clinton done? Continue to run gigantic deficits on military spending? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 04:38 PM Response to Reply #36 |
52. You say you got out under Clinton. Now you're back in. CIC more of your liking? -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 07:01 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. That's sad. Clinton increased the military budget by 14 percent, reversing the trend under Bush I. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 04:36 PM Response to Reply #17 |
51. What, exactly, would they have done? Please share. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 12:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
42. Are you kidding me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverojo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:10 AM Response to Original message |
5. Does a bear shit in the woods? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RushIsRot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 03:57 AM Response to Original message |
19. I think the more progressive an elected official might be, the more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Perry Logan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
24. Most wingnuts are too cowardly to try anything. They're basically chickenshits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 07:23 AM Response to Original message |
27. I think any Democratic President will be in danger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 07:49 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. I was pretty much going to say the same thing. When I think of 3/10ths of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 07:44 AM Response to Original message |
28. Yes, but I'm more worried about the internal threats to any Dem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
30. I am changing the subject a bit and asking this question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 12:08 PM Response to Reply #30 |
44. I believe that Johnson killed Kennedy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCentepedeShoes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 12:34 PM Response to Reply #30 |
45. Maybe you're thinking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCentepedeShoes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 01:49 PM Response to Reply #30 |
49. Oppsie! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
A-Schwarzenegger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 01:57 PM Response to Reply #30 |
50. Youve goofily combined Martha Mitchell and Marina Oswald. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crabby Appleton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 06:40 PM Response to Reply #30 |
57. You certainly have your facts mixed up. Nelly Connally, John's wife |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vinca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
31. Absolutely and it worries me very much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 07:57 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. All you need is a couple agents loyal to the neocon cause. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VP505 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 10:10 AM Response to Original message |
34. I wouldn't speculate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
35. bushitler or dickwad haven't been whacked yet and they openly kill their kids, so no, not worried. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
40. neither is a true progressive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheap_Trick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
41. of course there would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
43. When I left the RFK campaign office we knew we were going to the White House |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
47. Not so much for those 2. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. So you dont think that their are white supremacists that cant handle a black President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 06:50 PM Response to Reply #48 |
58. I don't doubt that there are white supremacists who wouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DS1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-24-07 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
53. I know a guy who runs a computer tracing bix, and there's already been one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 17th 2024, 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC