Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Media Matters: Jake Tapper goes easy on St. Rudy. surprised?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:13 AM
Original message
Media Matters: Jake Tapper goes easy on St. Rudy. surprised?
Tapper did not challenge Giuliani's claim that he did not "get the information" about Kerik

http://mediamatters.org/items/200711090013?f=h_latest

here's a shocker: in the continuing effort to polish Giuiliani's 911 halo, Jake Tapper lets him off the hook regarding his misleading characterization of his relationship with his muliptly-indicited, already-confessed-criminal, fellow-fornicating friend

and, did anybody hear/see/read anything about Brian Williams' interview with Giuliani? I heard him say that the entire, unedited transcript is available online, presumable somewhere at NBC

Summary: In an interview with Rudy Giuliani, ABC News' Jake Tapper let Giuliani claim, without challenge, that "he mistake" he made in "appointing police commissioner Department of Corrections chair," "was not getting the information" that Kerik had ties to Interstate Industrial, a company with suspected connections to organized crime. However, in April 2006, Giuliani reportedly "acknowledged" in "testimony to a state grand jury" that "the city investigations commissioner ... had told him that he had been briefed at least once" about Kerik's connections to the company.



During his November 8 interview with Republican presidential candidate and former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, ABC News chief political correspondent Jake Tapper did not challenge Giuliani's claim that "he mistake was not getting the information" about the ties his embattled former police commissioner Bernard Kerik had to Interstate Industrial Corp., a company with suspected connections to organized crime. During the interview, Tapper asked Giuliani, "Was it a mistake appointing him police commissioner; Department of Corrections chair?" Giuliani replied, "The mistake was not getting the information," suggesting that he had not been aware of Kerik's relationship with Interstate Industrial. But, according to a November 3 New York Times article, in 2006, Giuliani "acknowledged" in "testimony to a state grand jury" that "the city investigations commissioner, Edward J. Kuriansky, had told him that he had been briefed at least once" about Kerik's connections to the company.

Additionally, according to the Times, Kuriansky also briefed Giuliani's chief of staff and had documentation of both "sessions." The Times previously reported that Giuliani testified "that he had no memory of the briefing, but did not dispute that it had taken place." Tapper did not ask Giuliani about his reported acknowledgment that Kuriansky has said that he briefed him on Kerik's connections to Interstate Industrial.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. if the media don't go after this one SOON, you'll know the fix is already very heavily in.
This story isn't new...the bit about Rudy 'forgetting' his testimony to a GRAND JURY about his prior knowledge of Kerik's ties to "Interstate Industrial Corp., a company with suspected connections to organized crime"

there's lots of good stuff in here, including already reported material regarding Giuliani's GRAND JURY testimony that "the city investigations commissioner, Edward J. Kuriansky, had told him that he had been briefed at least once" about Kerik's involvement with IIC, and that Giuliani
''testified 'that he had no memory of the briefing, but did not dispute that it had taken place.' ''

but, as I've said over and over, I think this story will end up where Harken Oil, SEC, Funeralgate, TANG, etc., did a few years ago

I sincerely hope I'm wrong

but give me one reason to believe the M$M will treat this, or any other Rudy stories, any differently than they did all the Bush Campaign-sinkers of three and seven years ago

just ask Wayne Barrett
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. OK...another tack
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Tucker Carlson introduces the country to Master Linus van Pelt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-10-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. if you read the comments following the OP link, you'll see that number 3 has
a MOST excellent suggestion for jogging RG's ''selective memory''
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-11-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. last chance before this sinks: Tapper was on Howard Kurtz today
and completely ignored this section of his interview, choosing, instead, to assert that RG's handling of the Kerik situation serves only to make him "seem candid" in the eyes of potential voters!

he really said that

he THEN said how BAD it looked to his wife, "a democratic woman" that Hillary had that question planted. he didn't realize how bad it was, at first, but his wifey wife's response wised him up

so which story was more important to him?

pretty obvious, and it's pretty obvious how the M$M is going to handle stories this cycle: just how they did it in 2000 and 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC