Musharraf has learned the Bush lexicon, and stands poised to shove it up Bush's ass. Check this out:
General Musharraf’s supporters argued Sunday that his government — now unencumbered by legal constraints and political concerns by the emergency decree — will be in a better position to eradicate extremists and that if the United States wants that security, it must back him. Isn't that the exact same argument that Bush has been making to the American people since 9/11 - that established laws were standing in the way, and the only way to 'keep us safe' was to circumvent those laws??
This next bit makes me wonder if Musharraf has been watching The Sopranos.
“If your agenda is to save attacks in the U.S. and eliminate Al Qaeda, only the Pakistani Army can do that,” said the close aide to General Musharraf. “For that, you will have to forget about elections in Pakistan for maybe two to three years.” Now, it it just me, or does it sound like Pervez is saying to Bush something along the lines of 'Nice country you've got there - be a shame if something happened to it'?
And the ironies are in danger of a Fresno-style pile-up here - it seems like the guy who's shaking down Bush is possibly the one leader who is even less popular in his country than Bush is here.
There is little question that General Musharraf has failed to develop broad domestic support for battling terrorists. His political party is divided, has not carried out promised reforms and would likely lose an election.
A poll in September by Terror Free Tomorrow, a Washington-based nonprofit group, showed that Osama bin Laden was more popular in Pakistan than General Musharraf, with 46 percent of respondents giving him a “favorable” rating against 38 percent for the president. Ms. Bhutto got a “favorable” rating from 63 percent. The nationwide poll surveyed 1,044 adults and had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points. Seriously, though - this is bad. But in true Bush fashion, give it a week, and it'll no doubt be much, much worse.
(original post at
http://www.blah3.com/article.php?story=20071105001302823. Source material from
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/05/washington/05diplo.html.)
- as