Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Why can we have a Miss Black America pageant and not a Miss White America pageant?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:14 AM
Original message
"Why can we have a Miss Black America pageant and not a Miss White America pageant?"
Someone misguidedly used this old chestnut here last night to "prove" something about racism... You may be interested in the infamous "Rule 7" of the Miss America contest. Here is the contract for a local pageant in 1948. As you peruse it, you will see why it was necessary to have a Miss Black America. Any more questions? :)

=====

CONTRACT
Between Official Franchise Holder And Miss America Pageant
For Conducting Local Contests To Name A Candidate To Be
Entered In The National Finals For the Selection Of

Miss America, 1948
Atlantic City, N.J., September 6th to 13th

(Name of Franchise Holder) of (Street Address) (City and State) hereby accept the exclusive rights to sponsor and conduct the territorial contests within the territory listed as follows: (Name of Territory)

We hereby agree to sponsor, promote and finance fair and unbiased contests within the territory assigned to us, according to the rules and regulations set forth in this contract.

We agree that we will not assume any obligations locally for or on behalf of the Miss America Pageant, and we thoroughly understand that the Miss America Pageant is in no way obligated to pay for any debts or fulfill any promises made by us in conducting our local preliminary contests.

We agree to pay first class transportation to Atlantic City and return of winning candidate from our territory and to see that she arrives in Atlantic City not later than 6 P.M. on Monday, September 6th, 1948.

We agree to provide winning candidate with $10.00 in cash for incidentals in Atlantic City, and to also provide her with sufficient money for meals while enroute.

We agree to furnish winning candidate from our territory with a maximum of four evening gowns and a minimum of three evening gowns to wear in the national contest.

We agree to mention the $25,000 Scholarship awards which will be given sixteen 1948 Miss America contestants at the National Finals, in all promotional material used in conducting our preliminary and final contests and to acknowledge the donors of this Scholarship Foundation. We understand that these companies are:

(Company Name)
(Company Name)

We also agree to furnish the Miss America Pageant with copy of each piece of said advertising and promotional material used.

We agree that in judging preliminary and final contests to select our candidate for the National Finals, we shall follow the national contest method of judging, copy of which we have received and acknowledge herewith.

We agree that if for any reason contestant winning our official final contest is disqualified or released from appearing in the Miss America Finals at Atlantic City, then the next choice of the judges shall be considered the winner of our contest.

We agree to abide by the following rules and regulations for selecting contestants:

1. Contestant must be resident of city, state, or territory in which local contest is held for six months prior to contest. This rule is only waived for contestants whose residence is out of the city or state, but who is a college or university student in city or state where contests is held and at time contest is held. She may not compete in more than one Official Preliminary Contest each year.

2. Contestant must be single and never have been married, divorced, or had marriage annulled.

3. Contestant must be high school graduate or a senior attending high school at time of contest.

4. Contestant's age on September 1, 1948 shall be not less than eighteen, and more than twenty-eight years.

5. Contestant must be of good character and possess poise, personality, intelligence, charm, and beauty of face and figure.

6. Contestant must possess and display in a three minute routine TALENT. This talent may be singing, dancing, playing a musical instrument, dramatic reading, or she may give a three minute talk...

7. Contestant must be in good health and of the white race.

8. Contestant may be either amateur or professional.

The Miss America Pageant agrees to accept our candidate in their National Finals in Atlantic City, September 6th of 1948, and to furnish hotel accommodations and meals for her during the week...


http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/missamerica/filmmore/ps.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. And how come Miss UNIVERSE always comes from planet Earth?
Things that make you go hmmmm...

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. THAT I cannot help you with.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Love Bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. Diebold tallies the votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
31. Because the judges are from Earth and alien women do not conform to earth-standards
of beauty, hu-man.

Well, a few do. Here's Miss Ventura, 1966 receiving her title and customary 200 Quatloos.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #31
92. DennyCrane!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
153. Because Captain (sleep with anything) Kirk isn't a judge.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
171. Ha, ha
Years and years ago that show "Lost in Space" had a Miss Universe contest where all the gals from other planets came to compete. It seems the human teen girl didn't win because her skink was pink. Or maybe she won because of it, I don't remember but some of the other gals thought humans were ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. Well... you answered this:
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 09:16 AM by redqueen
"why it was necessary"

Can you answer this:

"why it is necessary, still"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whoneedstickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. It isnt...
But identity is power, identity frames interests, identity dictates rights and benefits in the new politics of America. Get your identity soon before all the good ones are gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I guess it is necessary because it was necessary
It's hard to kill off a money making venture and I am sure there are those that make a living off of a Miss Black America Pageant as well. Anyway, there are so many Miss Something or Other pageants out there why not a Miss Black America pageant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. That's what I think, yup.
$$$$$$$$
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Because this is the idea of a black Miss America >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 09:38 AM by Bluebear

And she is gorgeous, alright, but she:


probably would have no chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
44. According to who?
Oprah was Miss Black Tennessee and competed in the Miss Black America tournament



here is former Miss Black America



other contestants.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #44
71. I thought Bluebear wrote "a black Miss America", not "a Miss Black America".
Someone is having a little dyslexia this morning - or is looking for something that's not there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #71
84. Look in the mirror.
"Why can we have a Miss Black America pageant and not a Miss White America pageant?"

OP title

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #84
98. Not what the post you responded to said. Try to keep these things straight.
It helps communication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #44
74. Well, I see now why the OP is so "unclear" to you, you are missing it completely.
The Miss ... oh never mind... someone, help!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. A white woman would look silly doing commercial endorsements for black women's hair care products.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Yup...
all goes back to $$.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Has racism ended and oppression no longer exists?
If not then any oppressed minority has reason to celebrate their selves as a means of pressing back the emotional harm of such oppression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. Celebrate their selves?
Uh... yeah... I guess so.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #17
29. I sense confusion
Could be the :shrug: Care to elaborate? Do you disagree with this notion? Do you think it silly to celebrate one's people when another people are dismissive of you? Just curious as to your take on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. I think beauty pageants are stupid.
I don't see that they "celebrate" anything but cashing in on the tawdry, vacuous tradition of image-worship... but obviously many disagree. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. Yes, that's obviously the point of the whole thread.
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 09:36 AM by Bluebear
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #37
43. Huh?
Sorry, I just dont' see that any miss or ms or mrs. anyhing is celebrating anything but vacuousness, aimed directly at girls and women.

If you disagree that's fine... but why the eye-rolling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #43
49. I suspect what he is getting at
Is that the point of the thread is about oppressed minorities raising themselves up through a variety of means. Whether beauty pageants are a proper method of doing so is tangential to the actual point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #49
53. Yeah I guess...
I like how you said that without the dripping contempt. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #53
59. Oh dear, I'm so sorry.
You took "contempt" out of a little icon? I am terribly sorry, you rad way too much into that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. Whatever it was...
it rubbed me the wrong way, that's all... no need for your sorries. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #49
63. Here, you are doing a better job than I am, help! >>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #43
52. Because the validity of pageants is quite another topic.
You started off by challenging why we "had" Miss Black America, why do we have it now? Ending the topic by just saying "oh well, I don't like pageants anyhow" kind of goes off track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. I didn't challenge it, I was curious to hear your thoughts.
And I didn't even *try* to "end" it there either... I was simply responding to someone else's reply to something I said.

Fucksake...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #56
60. OK don't go off on a tear here, see above.
I didn't mean to show you "dripping contempt" with a little icon. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #56
82. Ok lets slow this down a bit
We seem to agree that beauty pageants are perhaps not the best thing in the world. I am not sure where we stand relative to whether groups that experience oppression are justified in finding ways to raise themselves up. My take on this conversation is that this is the focus rather than the validity of beauty pageants. Are we in agreement on this issue or are we still at odds on it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:15 AM
Original message
Is this subject even worth this much discussion?
:rofl:

Yeah, I see that that's the point of the topic... I responded to your response the way I did cause it just seemed like such a hilarious way to describe a beauty pageant... as a way to celebrate oneself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
107. Well how one celebrates oneself
Is really up to the individual or group as the case may be. I find people dancing around and smacking each other to be the height of hilarity. But the English think it is the bees knees. (see Morris Dancing).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #107
113. Do they do that only if there's some kind of compensation involved?
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 10:23 AM by redqueen
I'm sure unaware of any pageants for which there is no prize at the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #113
142. Many pageants only have honorary rewards
Ribbons and trophies. The real reward is winning. Being crowned. Being held in esteem above others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #142
145. Bleargh. (nt)
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 11:06 AM by redqueen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #145
151. I understand
:D :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #33
45. Ah... well that is an entirely different issue
But the fact is some people take strength and pride from such "celebrations". I have to agree with the rejection of beauty pageants in general. But then thats my (and yours apparently) taste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #33
97. Yes, a lot do disagree
But you have me in agreement on that point if it means anything. I have been half tempted to throw the money issue into this debate but it would detract from the central point. But the truth is that one of the reasons there is a Miss Black America Beauty Pageant is because there is money to be made. But don't tell anyone else in this debate as it will throw a monkey wrench into the entire argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #97
104. Well that's the only answer there is, sadly.
All this celebration and pulling themselves up IMO is just nonsense.

Why do people enter pageants? PRIZE MONEY! Aduh! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #104
111. Hardly
If you have ever been exposed to the culture of beauty pageants its hardly about the money. It is borderline fanatical... strike that... it is fanatical devotion to ego.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #111
114. They're not in it to enter...
they all want to win... and they don't want to win to get a picture in the news... they want some kidn of prize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #114
116. The majority do not win
Yet they continue to enter contests. The money is part of it. But the culture of the beauty pageant is dominated by ego and winning for the win. Even those who do not win feed their ego by being amongst those considered beautiful by some measure. Of course the problem is that trying to feed this sort of egotism is a never ending path. There are less difficult ways to make money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #116
117. True... I guess the ego is part of it too...
not so celebratory or pulling-yourself-uppatory, though, is it?

Well, wait a minute... in this culture... perhaps it is. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #117
141. No one said it had to make sense to us
People value the things they value. As society and understanding shift so to do the things they value. But not everyone in the society learns things at the same pace so values and views are not a consistent thing across the society. So what you and I see as a disparaging tawdry display of objectifying women others (including women) see as something worthy of praise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #141
144. Well of course including women...
they're mostly the ones feeding it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #29
70. Celebrating one's race is not the same as celebrating one's culture.
I think it is a perfectly reasonable decision to try and preserve the culture of ones ancestors, and to indulge in it more than other cultures because one is descended from it.

I don't think it's reasonable to celebrate one's race, or to make cultural events racially-discriminatory.

If there were a long-standing tradition among black Americans of holding beauty pageants, that might be a reason to go on holding beauty pageants. It would not be a reason to hold black-only beauty pageants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #70
91. When one's race is the cause of oppession
it becomes something worth rallying around. If everyone were enlightened your argument would be valid. But the truth is that there are still a great number of people who view race as a valid issue to dismiss people by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #70
119. you haven't given this stuff much thought, have you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whoneedstickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
26. Who counts as oppressed?
Really, I imagine lots of identity subgroups probably 'feel' oppressed how do we determine who is deserving?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Deserving of what? What subgroup is being prohibited from having a pageant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whoneedstickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #28
48. The pageant issue is just a subset..
..of a whole larger set of issues regarding which sub-population have the power to claim and assert difference and to mobilize that identity and difference as a strategy for political and social influence.

To some degree this depends on popular opposition derived from the social construction of that identity (and the degree to which 'historical oppression' has been grafted onto the identity label). Groups that can't claim this are less empowered to assert a special status but are not entirely powerless. I imagine you might have a Miss Evangelical pageant? Perhaps a Miss Union pageant? I doubt a Miss Anglo-Saxon pageant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #48
57. Miss Redneck Pageant!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #26
41. Deserving?
There is more to that question than it would seem. Any group can of course identify themselves as oppressed and decide to try to promote themselves within the larger society. But the question is which groups are in fact trying to raise themselves up from oppression and which are merely trying to reassert their dominance. Which are striving for equality and which are striving to maintain their oppressive roll?

I don't think there is any one adjudicator of such matters. These things must be played out within the society itself. How a group presents itself carries a lot of the weight. If Fred Phelps held a Miss Straight America pageant we can be pretty sure that its not meant to raise an oppressed minority but rather to assert dominance of continued oppression. He certainly would have the right to hold such a pageant. But we would have the right to see it as bigoted and oppressive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #41
64. I find this sort of identity politics abhorrent; I am an individual, and no "group" speaks for me
The fact is, "whitness" is an artificially constructed and outwardly imposed identity. You call me "white" and claim any effort my family makes to better itself is "trying to reassert dominance."

But when my family arrived in the USA as indentured servants, they were not considered white, and their children faced "Irish need not apply" signs all over the south. My father did not graduate high school, and made a living as a landscaper (you know, a job that Americans won't do! :eyes: )

Now, in 2007, it is acceptable to discriminate against me and my children because someone with similar looking skin tones is successful? How is that just? How is that not racism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #64
77. I don't recall when the entire human race became enlightened
Yes, there is a lot of stupidity inherent in racism and the reactions to it. But they are in fact part of our society. And groups that society identifies and classifies via various emotional labels are going to gather themselves together and find ways to counter this societal tendency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #77
95. Don't assume today's bigotries won't be looked upon by future generations with the same horror
as those in the past then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #95
100. Could you restate that?
Not sure what you are saying. I would rather you restate it than me slaughtering it by guessing at what I think you are saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justyce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Exactly. 1948.... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. "Exactly. 1948" what?
All is well and good and equal now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
120. because racism still exist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #120
135. I think it's more about money, myself...
beauty pageants don't really seem to address racism, except during the question and answer portion of the contest. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #135
147. thats a different issue. beauty pageants as a whole maybe useless which is another argument for
another issue.

however the need for minorities to have beauty pageants that cater to their own race/religion/sexual orientation is another issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #147
157. Ow at "need"...
but yeah... anyone who wants a new one... I have no problem with it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. 1948????
And no, I'm not EVEN going to get into any kind dialog about this. I know a land mine when I see one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Yes, 1948. Not that long ago, is it?
If I had said 1872, you may have a point :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. How about a Miss Transgendered America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
13. That question drives me insane
You can have a Miss White America contest if you so choose. Where on earth do people get the idea that you can't?

You probably won't get many sponsors, and you'll probably be mocked, ridiculed, and protested against, but the freedoms of speech and association that guarantee you the right to hold a Miss White America contest also grant potential sponsors the right to run away screaming and protesters the right to point out what a jackass you are.

Conservatives talk big about responsibility, but the "anti-PC" backlash suggests to me they don't want to be responsible for their speech: you can say pretty much anything you want, but you can't keep people from calling you a jerk for it. What I think the person who asked that question meant is, "why would I be called an asshole for organizing a Miss White America while the organizers of Miss Black America are not called assholes?"

The dishonesty of that question is, the organizers of Miss Black America were and are spoken against, generally by people who ask that kind of question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Look upthread, the question really irritates some people at a basic level
You are exactly right, you certainly can have a Miss White America, have at it ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. Again - $$.
The PR people know it would take a nosedive...

If the whiners want to invest the money... GO FOR IT! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
20. hmmmm ..... no rules about heterosexuality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. "Contestant must be of good character"
You don't think they would kick out a lesbian with that rule?

So, here am I, a gay white male, taking up the torch of racism in America by starting this thread, and all you can do by way of thanks is insert something about sexuality to "prove" that being gay is not like being black? Thanks a bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #22
50. Is that what you are doing?
The point of your OP is completely unclear to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #50
54. "The point of your OP is completely unclear to me." - I can't help you there, sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #54
66. Funny, because I thought it was pretty clear. Looked to me like an explanation of why
there has been, and is, a beauty pageant expressly for black women.

I don't know how far one would have to have their own head up their ass to not understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #66
68. Thank you, I don't see the big mystery here. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #68
75. When the only tool you have is a hammer, everything you face looks like a nail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #75
76. The point that is unclear is why you write about the 1948 Miss America contest now
Why do you do that?

What is the point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #76
81. Why does Bluebear need a reason?
How about "he felt like it"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #81
90. Why are you sticking your nose into my conversation with him?
Miss America, 1990, Dr. Debbye Turner

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #90
99. If you don't understand or like how message boards function, that could be
very upsetting for you, I understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #99
115. Didn't answer my question, did you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #115
156. If you'd like more of an answer, try this: I'm adding to the public conversation
on a message board because I feel like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #76
86. Did you read the first sentence of the OP?
Does that answer you as to what inspired the post? Are you being deliberately combative?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #86
93. Yes, and it is unclear
"Someone misguidedly used this old chestnut here last night to "prove" something about racism"

Who tried to prove what about racism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #93
96. I can't refer to it without calling out another member or breaking the rules.
Everybody else at least seems to get the gist of what this thread is about, I have no idea why you are trying to grind an axe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #96
121. grind an axe. lol. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #76
89. The 1948 rules are the reason that initiated the issue
The fact that racism continues is why the Miss Black America Pageant continues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. That explains the dozens of lesbian Miss America winners, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. How would we know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. How would we know about the non-white women who "passed"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #34
51. And back then, Irish and Jewish weren't "white"
Well, Irish was by 1948, but it hadn't been for long. Also, a majority of hispanics in America today are "white", though I don't think they would have counted by the pageant's rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #51
62. Irish was by 48?
Ain't it funny how even people will divide themselves from each other, by any means necessary?

*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #62
69. Umm, this isn't an example of "people dividing themselves". It's historical fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #69
73. Ummmmm, did I say it wasn't?
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 09:56 AM by redqueen
Cause... like... DUH!

And it's NOT the only case... in that case it was "white" people finding a reason to look down on other "white" people... but the shit goes on all the time... all over the world.

Geeeeeeeez... people in this forum!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #73
80. The point is, it isn't "people dividing themselves"
And Irish (also Jews, Greeks, Italians) were not considered white for most of this country's history.

By claiming it is "'white' people finding a reason to look down on other 'white' people" you are attempting to blur the distinction between the oppressor and the oppressed. The socially constructed identity of "whiteness" is the tool that allows you to do this; since the people who hung the "no Irish" signs and the Irish themselves are both constructed as "white", this is merely an example of "white people" discriminating against themselves, and therefore the victims are responsible for their own discrimination such that they not only deserve no special consideration, but instead deserve the same condemnation as bigots who placed the signs in the first instance.

In this way, an artificially constructed "whiteness" is used to excuse discrimination, and to place guilt by association on previously marginalized groups.

Geeeez indeed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #80
94. Wow... you sure read a lot into that!
Yes, they weren't considered white... until they were... and now they are.

I'm not attempting to blame any victims here or claim that anyone deserves condemnation AT ALL... I don't know where the hell you got all that.

All I'm doing is pissing and moaning about how PEOPLE, okay... not "white" people, not "black" people... but ALL people... ALL of them... (well... all stupid ones) will find a way to look down on their fellow PEOPLE, for one reason or another... but they will fucking find one for one reason or another... even Irish! Catholics vs. Protestants? Ring a bell?

There, is that better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #94
105. The conversation about race takes place in context.
And the "Catholic vs. Protestants" issue isn't/wasn't about "finding a way to look down on their fellow people..."

It was about genocide, occupation, and an attempt by England to displace the native population of Ireland with colonizers. Ever hear of the Scots-Irish?

Again, you are using "whiteness" to gloss over historical crimes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #105
112. Jesus Mary and Joseph!
It is so about people DIVIDING themselves from each other... for whatever dumbass reason (but most often, $$$ is involved).

How about if I brought up Darfur, how black people are committing genocide against other black people... would I be using 'blackness' to "gloss over" crimes?

I really don't get why you're trying to twist everything I say.

FWIW, I don't know about "Scots-Irish", but I know about Bobby Sands, and I know about how much food was taken from Ireland during the famine to be exported to Britain. Do I have enough "cred" with you now that you'll stop assuming the worst and reading ridiculous crap into every fucking word I post?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #112
123. Yes. Reducing Darfur to "black people killing other blacks" is a gross oversimplification
that does nothing but deflect attention from the true source of the conflict.

Race theory was not invented to empower people, but rather to marginalize them. As a consequence, any time you are tempted to reduce a complex geo-political situation to "black people...committing genocide against other black people," ask yourself what insight is gained by this mode of analysis. Most often, as with Northern Ireland and Darfur, race theory can lead to a clearly erroneous conclusion.

The conflict in Darfur, e.g., has next to nothing to do with race. It has to do with oil money and genocide. Race theory adds nothing to the analysis, but rather blurs the distinction between the Janjaweed murderers and their animist victims--to this view, it is insulting and downright dangerous to analyze the situation in Darfur as "black people...committing genocide against other black people."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #123
126. Right... it's about money... oil = money.
However, this thread is about (as you pointed out) race.

So... I was going with the whole context thing, and looking at examples of people from the same "race" (such a meaningless, fucked-up term, since as you said "white" isn't even a race!... but that's the way the term is being used in this thread).

*sigh*

As I tried to explain before... it's people against people... all over the world.


I'm curious now... what "erroneous conclusion" can people come to by observing the "race" of the people in these conflicts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #51
78. Bess Myerson, first Jewish Miss America, 1945
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bess_Myerson

Bess Myerson (born July 16, 1924, Bronx, New York) in 1945 became the first Jewish woman to win the Miss America pageant. She appeared in various television shows in the 1950s and 1960s. In the 1970s and 80s, she was involved in New York City politics.

While competing in beauty pageants, Myerson refused, despite entreaties, to employ a pseudonym that "sounded less Jewish". She faced prejudice even after winning the Miss America title, with many sponsors and events long associated with the pageant refusing to deal with her. She later campaigned for civil rights, in particular, working with the Anti-Defamation League.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #51
79. Actually, Bess Myerson, who is Jewish, won Miss America some time during
the 1940s, so yes, Irish and Jewish were considered "white" by 1948.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #79
163. As were Latinos and Asian...
As were Latinos and Asian considered white during the war, as they were not allowed to drink from the Colored Fountain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #51
88. A majority of Hispanics in America are white?
If by that you mean that on census forms we are for some reason counted as "Caucasian," then yeah, I guess we're all white. I can't wait to tell my neighbors!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #88
124. Pssst. Race is a made up concept. There is no "scientific" proof of who is "white"...
You are "white" because the US government says you are. Same as I am (Irish). And my neighbor (Chaldean).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #124
127. Caucazoid, Mongoloid, Negroid.
Most people seem to confuse nationality with race.

Argh... the stupid... it hurts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #127
132. I completely reject both "caucasian" and "Anglo"
I'm neither Iranian nor English.

I especially bristle at native English speaking hispanics calling me "Anglo". :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #132
134. Such twaddle...
those three 'races' were made up out of whole cloth based on that most scientific of sciences: facial features!

:rofl:

Amazing that the whole concept hasn't been blown out of the water... but wait... no, it really isn't... it serves a purpose, doesn't it? Keeping this meaningless BS around, all this time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #134
139. what meaningless BS? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #134
152. I agree with you there. The greatest tragedy is people who "only date in their race"
How can you look at a beautiful person of another skin tone and not be attracted? :wtf:

Thank god my "race" is the human race!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #134
161. Well, there are *some* scientific bases for broad racial categories...
At least in medicine, I know, there are some drugs that it's safer to give "caucasoids" than "negroids" because of general genetic differences (obviously you need to take each patient individually, but in a trauma/emergency situation it's a pretty sound rule of thumb). The 19th- and early 20th-century racial diagnostic criteria were hopelessly simplistic and naive (and racist, BTW), but DNA research is showing the differences that there are, and is leading to some more finely-honed therapies than were previously available.

But, the fact remains that a "black" Colombian and a "white" Peruvian (2 races, both hispanic) probably have more in common with each other culturally than the white Peruvian has in common with me, though the color-based "castes" in Latin America can be extremely strong in some places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #161
166. Ah yes... good point...
but I wonder... do the medical-type differences fall neatly along those three lines? Perhaps there are more? Fewer?

I'm curious now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #88
160. Yes, by the census's demographic criteria
Persons of hispanic ethnicity may be of any race; white, black, native american, asian (think the philippines). Hispanic is an ethnicity (or a collection of ethnicities) rather than a race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #51
169. If you could drink from the "Whites Only" fountain, you were white.**nm
**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #34
103. That's a good question. I asked it first though. In either case, how would we know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #103
155. As to lesbians, we can know this:
Beauty Pageants have long had "character" rules, they do some degree of checking on them, and I believe we can reasonably assume they would have frowned on lesbianism. (If you disagree on that last point, let me know and we can chat about it).

We also know Miss America has de-throned past winners on discovering that there was new information indicating that the winner had less than the character they desire in a winner.

So we can know that there either were no Lesbian winners, or if there were the Lesbian winners went onto live sham lives or went on to live in such a way that they had to hide who they were.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
24. more ignorant of minority issues...here or your local rotary club? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Toss-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
27. God...did they have separate drinking fountains in the auditorium?
I cringe when I see this kind of crap.

Horrible, shameful time in our country's history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
32. How come there's a Miss Polish-American?
Aren't they discriminating against everyone who isn't Polish-American?


http://www.misspolishamerican.com/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. Are you being perfectly serious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #35
87. I'm pointing out the insanity of this "having a Miss Black America is racist!" whining...
"Black" is comparable in one way to these European ethnic groups: having even a small percentage of the requisite ancestry is generally considered enough to make you a member of the group.


White, however, is a whole 'nother thing. White is partly about what you are -- a person whose ancestors came from Europe. But it's even more about what you're not: you can't have any discoverable African blood. Racist concerns are inherent to the definition of "white".


Thing is, Miss Black America does allow persons of European origin to compete. In fact, all but one of your ancestors could have been whites, and you could still be accepted as black. That's got to be the smallest blood quantum for group acceptance ever.


Would a Miss White America pageant be open to a person of African origin who also had a single European ancestor?


To any whites who feel left out of the Miss Black America pageant, remember: genealogy is your friend. Today, there are as many "whites" with one or more black ancestors who crossed the color line at some time in the past, as there are self-identified blacks. Don't just assume you're not black -- you very well could be.


Find out, and then get all your official documents changed. Then you can compete in all the black beauty pageants you want.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #87
102. "Then you can compete in all the black beauty pageants you want."
:rofl: I love it, thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #32
46. Most white ethnicities have their own pageants
And the winner goes to every Polish/Irish/Italian/whatever Heritage Festival in the country for the next year.

"White" is a fairly meaningless designation -- particularly given that it includes about 2/3rds of hispanics -- which may be another reason that "Miss White America" wouldn't be an economically feasible pageant; there's not much of a market for ribbon-cutting and sappy-vapid-speech-making for the winner to do over the course of the next year. (And notice, nobody I have heard of is complaining about Italian Heritage Day or Irish-American History Week or whatever -- unlike "white", those are meaningful cultures, and they should be respected and honored.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #46
55. :)
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 10:16 AM by Bluebear
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
36. How come there's a Miss German-American?
Aren't they discriminating against everyone who isn't German-American?


http://www.timesnewsweekly.com/Archives2003/Jan.-Mar.2003/032703/NewFiles/MISS%20GERMAN-AMERICAN.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. Will you be treating us to every ethnic pageant?
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 09:37 AM by Bluebear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #38
65. It's good for lurking freeps!
Their little brains will be all confused trying to explain how all those don't really count as "white".

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
39. How come there's a Miss Italian-American?
Aren't they discriminating against anyone who isn't Italian-American?

http://iaccrochester.org/italian.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #39
72. That's because Italian women are more dangerous than shotguns. Wouldn't be fair
or safe for the other women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
40. You could have a "Miss White America" pageant..
Good luck getting sponsors. Yup it's the $$$
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
42. Because there are no black people in North Dakota
therefore the states are not fairly represented.

Seems pretty obvious to me :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
47. How come there's a Miss Irish Eyes?
Aren't they discriminating against people with non-Irish eyes?

http://www.themillennews.com/news/2006/0322/Other_Jenkins_News/050.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #47
58. Can a non-Irish person have Irish eyes?
DISCRIMINATION!

DISCRIMINATION!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #58
67. I'm not Irish but I have Irish eyes.
They're in a jar in my collection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
83. Reminds me of some Portland high school students who complained
that they had to learn about black culture in school but never got to learn about white culture. :rofl:

(Hey, dude, you know that Shakespeare play you slept through?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
85. whats up with having their own college fund? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #85
101. Dare you to start that as its own topic. (nt)
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 10:17 AM by redqueen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #101
106. It would get rec'd to the greatest page. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #106
108. Is it me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #85
110. what's up with all the white ethnic scholarships?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #110
118. can I compete for all the white scholarships I want? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #118
122. oh, I'm sure they'd love to give you their money...
A fine scholar such as yourself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #122
131. well, I've been wrong about white people all along then. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #85
138. The answer is simple
It was started because the white colleges weren't giving scholarships to blacks based on race, how hard is that to understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #138
140. isn't that reversism? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #140
143. Reversism isn't a word
But I get your point and no it is not reverse racism, because the UNCF has never had segregated rules, anyone is free to apply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #143
146. sense when is reversism not a word? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #146
148. It's not in the dictionary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #148
150. big fat deal. clouding the debate. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #143
154. there's good reversism, and there's bad reversism...
In good reversism, you always check all three mirrors and look over your shoulder before you ever take your foot off the brake.


In bad reversism, you insist that there are no such things as blind-spots if you adjust your mirrors according to a revolutionary new method that you are currently in the process of patenting.

You scrape three other cars and take out a hydrant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
109. "At the end of the ceremony, all most give thanks to
Hitler for bringing in the ubermnech."

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
125. "7. Contestant must be in good health and of the white race."
I feel ill, literally. Is this still on the books?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #125
128. If it was, why would he go back to '48 for the example? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #125
129. No, thankfully
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #125
130. no, it's not still on the books...
Not sure when they changed it, though.

Also, that "in good health" bit seems to reflect other eugenic concerns. Anyone with a disability would also have been carefully rooted out, I imagine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
133. this thread is surreal. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
136. Why do we have to have a "Miss ANYTHING" anyways?
Our culture is vastly different now than it used to be and this particular institution just seems less than necessary - beauty pageants are nothing but sexist horseraces anyway, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #136
158. now that is a good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
137. Good point
People who use analogies like that are so ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
149. The second season of "In Living Color" had a "Miss Black Person USA" contest
which was a panic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #149
172. She's black!
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 04:39 PM by Chovexani
MISS BLACK PERSON USA!



David Alan Grier was a riot in that sketch. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
159. I don't see any harm in it, and of course, white folk were never slaves in the good old US of A.
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 02:18 PM by IsItJustMe
Maybe they are making up for lost time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
162. How about a Miss Average Looking America?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
164. let's just get RID of stupid fucking beauty pageants n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
165. Down with "beauty pageants!"
:puke:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
167. So, now that this contest is open to all races...
Why is there still a need for a Miss Black America Pageant?

I've always felt that "beauty" pageants were shallow as all hell, no matter the color of the contestant's skin.

A former "Miss Lomita" gave me her old exceptionally cool wardrobe when she won a whole new one in the contest. Since she wanted to go to college, I thought a scholarship would have been a better prize. I think that was the year that Regis Philbin MC'd the contest... and Rosemary Clooney sang... Rosemary was my favorite part. I wanted to be her soooo badly!!! Not because she was cute as a bug's ear, but those pipes! Damn fine pipes! But I digress egregiously:)

I'm of the firm belief that there should be no race mentioned anywhere. No Negro College Fund, no White Kid College Fund, no Miss Black this, that or the other... no white only... no Irish need not apply... nothing. Until we stop pointing to the differences, we will always consider ourselves different. And we aren't. And we need to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #167
170. first send your complaints to all the white ethnic scholarships and pageants....
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 03:47 PM by NorthernSpy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metalpurist83 Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
168. i'd say because
Edited on Wed Oct-31-07 03:34 PM by metalpurist83
otherwise minorities wouldn't get equal representation within the pageants.

don't get your panties in a bunch.

what's next, white history month?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #168
173. My 'panties' are fine, thank you.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC