Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Misleading headlines on Gore's status nothing new.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Admiral Loinpresser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 03:58 PM
Original message
Misleading headlines on Gore's status nothing new.
Here is a blog entry back on February 18, of this year, which is suddenly topical today:

http://algoredotorg.wordpress.com /

A strong rightward shift in ABC News (and The Note) has been discussed and documented by writers like Eric Boehlert, for example in his fine book Lapdogs, How the Press Rolled Over for Bush.

Al Gore represents a nightmare scenario for the right. If he runs, for example with Obama as VP, he could be well nigh unbeatable. Even a well known Gore-o-phobe like Chris Matthews admits as much.

It serves right wing interests to repress the emerging draft Gore movement. Obama at the top of the ticket will allow them not only to attack his middle name (Hussein) but to question his national security credentials in an uncertain time. And Clinton allows them to muddy the water on Iraq because of her ambivalence about the invasion (e.g. unlike Edwards, she has refused to apologize for her vote). Gore at the top of the ticket solves all aforementioned issues and provides a gravitas on national security and the climate crisis unrivalled by any Democrat alive today.

So repressing the draft Gore movement is a plus for the right. ABC News recently played along with that agenda by promoting the idea that Gore has recently ruled out a run in 2008:

http://www.bc.net.au/news/newsitems/200702/s1850162.htm

Unfortunately it was even picked up by the Huffington Post:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/topics/al+gore

All of it is silliness. Reuters made the same gaffe recently and was quickly debunked by Gore’s spokesman, as quoted in the Huffington Post (after they had repreated the gaffe in the Reuter’s instance as well):

“Absolutely nothing new,” Gore spokesman Michael Feldman said of the report. “He’s been saying the same thing for six years - that he’s not running but has not completely ruled it out - and depending on where he is, it’s reported differently.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/01/16/huffpos-melind...

So now ABC is spreading more of this cyclic misinformation.

You know what? Having to fight the “mainstream” press again is no big deal. Once you learn to anticipate journalistic malpractice at every turn, you learn to adapt. Like coastal residents who are experiencing rising hurricane insurance rates, it simply re-inforces the sentiment in the public that the system is broken. That sentiment, fortunately, fuels our movement.

So spread the word. As no clear frontrunner emerges in the Democratic race and as Gore keeps his powder dry, we can expect more journalistic malpractice from the likes of ABC News.

Here’s my tally: two major instances in this cycle of right-wing-favoring disinformation on Gore’s potential candidacy status so far (Reuter’s in Tokyo, ABC News in LA). And counting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. The more things change,
the more they stay the same.

The media doesn't want Gore in the race because they will be held accountable for their (f)re(ep)porting in 2000. They attacked Gore, they attacked Dean, Kerry and they take every opportunity they can to attack the Democrats in Congress. If Gore runs they will be smacked over the head with their own misdeeds. They, the media, can't afford for Gore to run. That's why this story keeps cropping up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. "It serves right wing interests to repress the emerging draft Gore movement."
amen.

thankyou for the analysis and reality check.

this thread needs rec's as everyone should see this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree, nashville brook, Al is the one they're most afraid of.
I believe he has an inherent advantage with the Internet, due to his political support for opening it up to all the people.

Thanks for the thread Admiral, and have a good night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Another reason they are probably doing this
If Gore DOES announce a run for '08, they'll pull the "oh, he must have been lying when he said 'he wasn't running.'"

I about had a heart attack when I saw that headline on DU this AM, saying he wasn't running. Glad I read the article and saw it was the same statement he's made all along with the M$M spin attached.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. That's right...
Looked at Google News this evening... that Norwegian story is all over the world right now. Gore doesn't have to just be concerned about tweaking national oil interests. I would think there are many corporate interests globally don't want him to run as it would certainly put a pall on their profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. What a heavy conversation must be going on in the Gore household...
(probably)...I would say I'd love to be a fly on the wall, but I don't think I even want to grasp the enormity of the things he has to consider before joining the race.
It is scary...and exciting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlowDownFast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R.
Thanks, Admiral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC