Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EPA approves 1-year use of pesticide despite warnings from over 50 scientists/chemists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 03:25 PM
Original message
EPA approves 1-year use of pesticide despite warnings from over 50 scientists/chemists
EPA approves 1-year use of pesticide

By RITA BEAMISH, Associated Press Writer Sat Oct 6, 7:01 AM ET

The Environmental Protection Agency gave the go-ahead for one-year use of a new agricultural pesticide Friday, saying its own scientific review overrides health concerns expressed by more than 50 chemists and other scientists.

Methyl iodide, also known as iodomethane, will be allowed to control soil pests "under highly restrictive provisions governing its use," the EPA said in a statement.

"When used according to EPA's strict procedures, iodomethane is not only an effective pesticide, but also meets the health and safety standards for registering pesticides," the agency said.

Methyl iodide was developed by Tokyo-based Arysta LifeScience Corp. as an alternative to the widely used fumigant methyl bromide, which has been banned under an international treaty because it depletes the ozone layer. Like methyl bromide, the new product, to be sold under the name MIDAS, kills off weeds and soil pests before planting a wide variety of fruits and vegetables.

The EPA said its decision was based on four years of risk assessment studies, constituting "one of the most thorough analyses ever completed by the agency for a pesticide registration action."

"The agency concluded that there are adequate safety margins and the registration of iodomethane does not pose unreasonable risks," the agency said. Last week, however, a group of 54 scientists, including six Nobel Prize winners, sent a letter to EPA urging that the pesticide not be registered for use because of the potential danger to pregnant women and children, the elderly and farmworkers.

more...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071006/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/farm_pesticide;_ylt=Amc3QWHGf_63Q.CgqX.b45ys0NUE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. The EPA is hardly protecting ANYTHING under Republican rule...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The repubs insist
that more orphans are needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. I know!
It really makes me sick! Bastards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. The EPA appears to be redefining what an unreasonable risks is these days.
Lives are no longer the focus but rather finance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Sounds like DHS, FEMA, etc. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's a symptom of a corporate sponsored government.
It's also a glaring reason why such governments are dangerous to the general population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blues90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
7.  The corporations could care less about health risks
All my life these chemical companies have been dumping crap onto the ground and air . It's amazing some of us older boomers are still alive .

All of this crap ends up in the water and food supply , one way of another . You really wonder how many years this crap hangs around still posing a risk .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC