Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army Denies Education Benefits To National Guard Troops Who Served 22 Months In Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 06:22 PM
Original message
Army Denies Education Benefits To National Guard Troops Who Served 22 Months In Iraq
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/national-guard-education/

Army Denies Education Benefits To National Guard Troops Who Served 22 Months In Iraq

Approximately 2,600 members of the Minnesota National Guard recently returned home after serving multiple tours of duty in Iraq. They served 22 months — “longer than any other ground combat unit” — recieved nine fatalities, and were awarded dozens of Purple Hearts.

But the Army wrote the orders for 1,162 of these soldiers for 729 days, making them ineligible for full educational benefits under the GI Bill, which requires written orders saying they were deployed for 730 days or more. These soldiers were shorted more than $200 per month for college.

First Lt. Jon Anderson believes that the military deliberately cut short their orders to avoid paying the soldiers’ education benefits:

It’s pretty much a slap in the face. I think it was a scheme to save money, personally. I think it was a leadership failure by the senior Washington leadership…once again failing the soldiers.

Watch CNN’s report on the issue at link~

Six members of Minnesota’s congressional delegation, as well as Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D) and Norm Coleman (R), have asked Secretary of the Army Pete Geren to investigate the matter. Coleman said that it’s “simply irresponsible to deny education benefits to those soldiers who just completed the longest tour of duty of any unit in Iraq.”

Geren has reportedly assured the lawmakers that the cases “will be reviewed on an expedited basis, so that those who qualify can attend school next semester.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bush's response: They should've been mercenaries. They would've been paid 4x better.
More money for contractors. No money for soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Of course, the Army did that shit deliberately
They do underhanded crap against the troops ALL THE TIME.

That was just the latest manifestation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. but they win a box of republican campaign pins. nt/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Have I mentioned lately how much I despise the GOP?
Now seems a good time to do so.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I know; it's beyond pathetic. Support the troops...
:nuke: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Effin' bait and switch. One of the reasons these kids joined the NG was to go to college.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Way to support the troops
Think the rest of America will catch on to this criminal group in office? And what a fucking cheap and underhanded way to screw the same guys who lay down their lives for country. Hope this gets a lot of coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. The bean counters who came up with this brilliant idea, should be forced
to look in the eye of every soldier they shorted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Why such a light pennance?
Ship'em to Iraq and let them try manning checkpoints for (almost) two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well Uncle Sam isn't turning out to be who they thought he was.
Stunner there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ManiacJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-04-07 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. We are missing some numbers somewhere.
The 22 months only comes to 669 days, well short (2 months) of the needed 730, even if that is what the orders had said.

And, yes, the 729 vs 730 was done on purpose purely for budget reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. 30 days or so on either end for prepping to deploy and prepping to come home?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ManiacJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Always a possibility.
Like I said, we are missing some numbers to make the math work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
11. BushCo's treatment of combat veterans is criminal . . .
they should be impeached just for that -- not to mention the hundreds of other crimes they've committed . . . everything from war crimes to crimes against humanity to ecocide . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvccd1000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
12. That's pathetic, and that's NOT the way most military units do it.
During the years between the gulf wars, when the Navy was enforcing the "no-fly zone" in Iraq, the Persian Gulf was not considered a combat zone, and was therefore not tax exempt. Most ships would find a way to sail into the Bosnian theater of operations so they would qualify for those benefits.

It's sad that this unit's command did not stick up for it in a similar manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
13. Save this article for any kids considering enlistment. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. They've been doing crap like this in the private sector for years
Edited on Fri Oct-05-07 07:38 AM by notadmblnd
Ford, GM, Chrysler and many other companies. Hire people and lay them off just before they get their time in so they don't have to pay benefits. Why wouldn't this government take their cues from the corporations that own them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. *ONE* day shy?? Who's the uncaring bastard that purposefully wrote those orders??? Rummy himself?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-05-07 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
18. kr nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC