Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Silly-ass moustache man John Bolton demands war with Iran......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 08:08 AM
Original message
Silly-ass moustache man John Bolton demands war with Iran......
I'm against violence, but I'd love to beat the hell out of this prick. - OP's special comment



from Think Progess:


Bolton: We Should Carry Out Regime Change In Iran Because ‘It Did Work In Iraq’


The Jerusalem Post reported yesterday that former U.N. ambassador John Bolton advised Tory delegates in Britain this weekend that they should press for “pre-emptive strike on suspected nuclear facilities” in Iran.

“Because life is about choices, I think we have to consider the use of military force,” Bolton said. He added that any strike “should be followed by an attempt to remove” the “source of the problem,” Iranian President Ahmadinejad.

Fleshing out his hawkish dreams on British television, Bolton suggested that the U.S. overthrow of Saddam Hussein in Iraq was a model for the “policy of regime change” he would like to see done in Iran:


Q: It’s not of the course the policy that worked in Iraq though, did it? I mean, that was the policy of regime change.

BOLTON: No, but I think it did work in Iraq. … Knowing everything we know today, I think it’s unquestionably the case that we were right to overthrow Saddam. We achieved our strategic objective. I think the world is better off for it.

I don’t think you should conflate what happened in the post-Saddam period. And whatever happened and however bad it’s been, doesn’t change the fundamental analytical point that we’re better off without Saddam.



There is no “strategic objective” that has been gained through the Iraq war. Rather, it has fueled the spread of terrorism, overstretched our ground forces, caused the unnecessary death of thousands of soldiers and Iraqi civilians, and fundamentally made the world a more dangerous place for the United States.

A military conflict in Iran is likely to produce the same effects as the Iraq war. Moreover, a military attack on Iran “would not, as is often said, delay the Iranian program. It would almost certainly speed it up.”

Bolton’s unquenchable appetite for war is easy to espouse given that he seems to care little about the disastrous consequences that follow.

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/01/bolton-iraq-iran/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. John Bolton. Mr. Irrelevant.
He should start working on a Vaudeville routine. He'll be unemployed and unemployable in 15 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I wouldn't write him off so quickly. The drums for more blood are being beaten loudly.
They want more blood and death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radiclib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. "We achieved our strategic objective"?
In a sane world, that statement alone would be cause for his immediate removal.:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-02-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. yea john, it's working great in iraq....what a dick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC