Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The New Iraqi Paradigm

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 09:09 AM
Original message
The New Iraqi Paradigm
Things are so bad we can't stay...Things are so bad we can't go...

I'm not endorsing this paradigm but I think it's emerging... I'm glad I'm not empowered because I don't know how to solve this dilemma or quagmire...That's why they call them dilemmas or quagmires...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think we missed several opportunities to leave.
We could have left after their constitution, we could left when we determined their were no WMD. We could have declared victory and left after elections, Saddam's capture, his hanging, etc. But, instead we built permanent bases, now one on Iran's border. We built the world's largest embassy. We missed all of the chances to exit gracefully and bring in the UN.

It's clear, now, from Fall 2007, that the plan was never to leave. Perhaps the *plan* was to destabilize the country to the point that we cannot leave. And, I think we are there now.

I want ALL the troops out yesterday. But, I am afraid that their is no chance of all troops being out anytime between now and 2027.

I wouldn't want to inherit this mess. I am amazed that anyone does. Their are no easy decisions to be made in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The plan was to steal away as many billions of barrels as possible
and make the taxpayers pay for the expenses, both in tax dollars and in blood.

The plan is still operational.

The plan also includes doing the same in the "n" country next to the current "q" country.

That plan is on its way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I Always Said Bush Attacked Iraq Because It Sounded Like Iran And He Got Them Mixed Up
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginchinchili Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, it's a good thing you're not "empowered" or we'd have ...
a continuation of the Bush policy, doing nothing. It's not one or the other, dilemma or quagmire. It's a quagmire without question, and it's only a dilemma if you allow yourself to approach it like most Republicans are, using dilemma as an excuse for supporting the status quo.

Joe Biden has come up with a viable plan that was endorsed by most Democrats and even many Republicans, at least the basic design of having federation-styled government, allowing Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds considerable autonomy and a weaker central government. Many Iraqi leaders have expressed varying degrees of support, including the powerful Shiite cleric Sustani.

Biden is the first to say it won't be easy and there are no guarantees, but it can at least give the Iraqis enough of a structure to work with and us an opportunity to leave in a responsible way.

The current situation is only a paradigm if you view unstructured chaos as a model for other countries or regions. I don't think anyone is doing that. Bush had planned on Iraq becoming a paradigm for the region, but today that's not much more than a bad joke, a 4 1/2 year old bad joke that will continue unless we truly do something different over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm Glad You're My Fan
Oh, the Iraqis rejected the partition plan...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-30-07 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. We can leave any time.
We are acting like a battered woman who has no choice. We have to keep voting for funding because otherwise we won't eat. Well, miss a meal, damn it.

Kucinich and Feingold voted no. They are the only prominent progressives who see things clearly. They could get us out of this mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 15th 2024, 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC