Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kyl-Lieberman up for debate then vote now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:41 AM
Original message
Kyl-Lieberman up for debate then vote now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Lieberman up first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. and thus world war III begins
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 11:45 AM by antifaschits
damn you & AIPAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Says it's for ECONOMIC pressure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. They struck some paragraphs... anyone got the new wording?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. I read on another thread that it doesn't change it much
But I don't have the wording.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
105. this article may help you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sense of the Senate, so many Dems will feel authorize to vote for it.
I am sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Webb objecting to our declaration of offician Iranian Guard as
combatants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Good for him. I haven't read it, but knowing Kyl (he's my Senator)
he's very sneaky and is a RRR up and comer. Yuck.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. yeas & nays called
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. Voting now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I'm not even watching and I'm almost shaking.
Please God, don't let it pass, don't let it pass. Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. They are not reading the votes out loud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Is that what's going on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. yup. . voting on wording that I haven't read yet. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. They're just calling roll, but some are voting during roll. Not official vote yet.
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 11:49 AM by wienerdoggie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. OK, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Can you get any sense of what's happening? Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
18. HOLY SHIT!! This will pass--big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. Durbin and Boxer AYE, so Yes it will pass big
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Jesus--no. How? Why? Just rhetorical--I'm sure you are asastonished as I am. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
19. lautenberg voted for it
both nelsons
levin
boxer
schumer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
34. Lincoln no - Clinton yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #34
51. Clinton YES???? Why is ANYONE voting for her in '08???
God she is just awful. This whole Congress is nothing but worthless, with a few fighters trying to work for us.

Horrible. Just horrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:59 AM
Original message
Lautenberg voted for it???? Lautenberg?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
20. Let's get this on the home page--need three more as I post. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
22. Boxer, AYE!??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:53 AM
Original message
she just changed it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
24. Biden, NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. I was wrong---Boxer, NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
25. Feingold, Hagel, Webb, Leahy, Kennedy--no. Well, that tells me all I need to know--
these are the best of the Senate. Lugar no, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
26. Kennedy NO.
At least 1/2 of my senators will vote NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
27. Boxer changes her vote!! WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #27
30. Good for her !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. Yes, that was a shock to me at first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
28. Amazing, isn't it, that while DU is having Two Minutes hate, this passes in quiet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #28
39. There've been numerous threads about this on DU. Look around. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #39
47. All I see are the Ahmedinijad Two Minutes Hate threads.
I am looking around. This is what I see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #47
56. I agree. Big distraction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #47
90. See that little box at the end of the thread title?
That hides the thread from view.

Don't like it, don't look at it. Simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #47
96. Here's a few from yesterday:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #39
106. numerous threads and what I can gather this is not
an amendment to invade Iran. Am I right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #28
49. *knods*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #28
98. Yep, the diversion worked very well, imo
All the kerfuffle about a man who has little power and is merely a loud-mouth blowhard takes precedence over a vote that may well have given bush the authority to bomb the shit out of Iran in the same way the Iraq vote occurred.

Unbelievable and fucking nuts, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
31. (word must be getting around the floor)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #31
61. That's the worst thing I've read all week
"Aye...wha? Oh shit, gotta read those bills...stupid stupid stupid...Nay!...too late? Oh well..."

Jesus. Sometimes I actually forget.

If I were in the Senate, I'd just wander around yelling random shit during votes. "Banana!" "Nerf!" "I make in my pants sometimes!" "I took the Lindberg baby!" "Fudge!" "Nerf again!"

Yeesh.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
32. Clinton aye. Oh well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #32
41. I'm back to the drawing board
on who to vote for now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:08 PM
Original message
What a tool.
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 12:12 PM by MyPetRock
But I will still vote for her in the general if she gets the Dem nom.

Edit: I think Ahmadinejad is despicable. But it is definitely NOT in our best interests as a country to be so aggressively in the face of Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
99. I won't vote for her--not after today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
33. BAD---Clinton AYE
You'd think she'd learn her lesson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
36. Were any changes made in this, as Reid suggested would happen? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #36
42. Yes - The worst paragraphs were removed BUT
Calling the Iranian National Guard official enemies was left in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #42
60. Is the word "combat" still in there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #36
57. Yes, Lieberman said that paragraphs 2 and 3 of the amendment
were changed because some of his colleagues thought it was an opening to declare war on Iran. The changes were not read by the clerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
37. Inouye no, Lincoln no. Cantwell no. Some of these Dems are changing their votes--why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #37
66. Cantwell voted no. Sometimes she surprises me and listens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
38. Reed yes (sigh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #38
43. Not Reed, Reid.
Though I do not know if Reed voted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #43
58. Reed AYE as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #58
107. that is my Senator I will call his office to get clarification and
Whitehouse too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weeve Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
40. sellouts
Clinton - aye. Why am I not surprised. Unbelievable that they'd enable Bush's warmongering ways even the slightest bit. This is a BIG greenlight people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #40
52. Just as I expected
Know your DLC:

This is why the DLC is dangerous. For all their claims of supposedly wanting to help Democrats, they employ people like Marshall Wittman who specifically try to undermine the Democratic Party, even if it means he has to publicly defecate out the most rank and easily-debunkable lies. They reguarly give credence to the right wing's agenda and its worst, most unsupportable lies. They are the real force that tries to make sure this country is a one party state and that Democrats never really challenge the Republicans in a serious way. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-sirota/why-the-dlc-is-so-dangero_b_13640.html

"The Democratic Leadership Council's agenda is indistinguishable from the Republican Neoconservative agenda," http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Kucinich_DLC_agenda_undistinguishable_from_Neocon_0813.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
44. So far two Repubs no--Hagel and Lugar. Klobuchar changes vote to no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Akoto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
45. Sorry for my ignorance, but ...
I can't get to the television right now. What are they voting for, exactly? I don't know what the amendment seeks to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Declare war on Iran.
At least that sure is what the language sounds like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #46
53. There's new wording. . most offensive removed
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 11:59 AM by annabanana
(or so I've been told)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #53
67. Webb was still warning against it. Still not a good amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #45
50. It's kind of authorizing Bush to attack Iran.
This is s "sense of the Senate" (non-binding) but it gives us an idea of how things will go when it's really being voted on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
48. Get ready for the party faithful to come tell us not to be enraged about this.
How many fucking times do we have to sit and watch this happen?

WHERE IS OUR FUCKING REPRESENTATION?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #48
54. GIven the number of dems who changed their vote to NO, I think the message has passed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #54
64. (hasn't gotten to Hillary yet)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #64
71. That surprises you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #48
62. makes ya wonder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
55. Reed of RI--aye, Stabenow aye. Surprised at Reed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
59. this is just beyond belief.
Those voting for this are fools or knaves. This, to me, is as bad as the IWR, even if it doesn't really authorize anything. They may not be handing bushco a loaded gun, but they're blithely giving him extra ammunition.

To those voting for this:

Have you no shame? Have you no conscience at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #59
68. I just don't want to believe it, but I'm witnessing it as it happens.
I'm inconsolable at this point. My nation has failed me.

I'm sobbing, I really am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #59
95. Not really. The Dems have been shameful lately.
It's only a surprise if you've had your head in the sand...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
63. Anyone know how Kohl (D-WI) voted? I'm glad Feingold voted no
but that's to be expected. Kohl is never a sure thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #63
103. Idiot voted AYE. Figures. God I wish someone would run against him
here. Not even the Repukes will put a challenge to him (Lorge was no challenge). They'll happily challenge Feingold, but never Kohl. God I wish he'd just retire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weeve Donating Member (427 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
65. E tu, Whitehouse ?
All I can hope is that some of the Dems are voting this way now, so they can later justify their NO votes when it's more of a binding vote. Still, this triangulation is exactly what got us into the Iraq mess in the first place. Guess my call to Patty Murray's office yesterday was for naught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #65
83. Maybe they threw out the word "combat" and that made it more acceptable
Maybe it sounds like a condemnation now????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
69. Kerry--no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #69
79. Good for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
70. 76 ayes. . passed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #70
80. Good Lord. I can't, don't want to believe it, but I heard it for myself.
How can it be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #80
85. Weak Democrats, always afraid of looking weak on defense and terror--that's how it can be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #70
82. OMFG!!!! NOOOOOOO!!!!!
:cry: What the hell is the matter with these people!!!! :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
72. Don't these people hear the drumbeat for war???????
They're playing right into Dick's plan. OMFG - they just agreed to the amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #72
75. Chickenshits--the few who voted NO cared more about avoiding war than
political calculation and re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #72
78. The only conclusion to draw, is that they AGREE with it.
This is why many of us are sick and fucking tired of the Democratic party.

WHERE IS THE OPPOSITION TO THIS MADNESS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #72
86. Love of the military industrial complex isn't limited to the right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
73. Did Obama vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #73
81. Did not hear it. If he didn't I'd be pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #81
84. Seems like Biden was the only candidate to do the right thing then
If Obama wasn't there to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #84
87. Biden just scored some points with me. Right now, the ME is THE issue. nt
Edited on Wed Sep-26-07 12:07 PM by blondeatlast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #87
89. Same here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #84
88. Obama voted -
not sure how tho. But I heard his name, because he did not vote on the Biden amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #88
91. I don't think anybody heard his vote called out though n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #84
92. Dodd as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #92
100. Sorry---I was going by my failing memory. I thought he voted NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #100
102. Which would be the correct vote. Clinton voted YES. Biden voted NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #73
94. They just had something on the screen that said Obama didn't vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #94
101. Now, what's his excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
74. The Senate has just opened Pandora's box
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
76. anyone know how Sanders voted? Or Obama? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #76
104. Sanders-no; Obama-not voting
The HRC folks are having a field day with this that he didn't show. Of course, they don't make any mention of the fact that she voted for this piece of $hit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
77. watching Liebs on the senate floor, smirking like
he just won the grand prize game, makes me want to vomit.


76 vs. 22?

The sliver of a silver lining is that it is not binding. that means nothing to cheney, tho. this is a war resolution, and we are about to see Iran attacked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
93. We should be marching on this congress by the millions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
97. Looking for the record on Thoma; can't find it. Anyone know the bill number? Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #97
108. look here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #108
109. Thanks. for some reason I just couldn't get it--prolly too damn pissed off to
think or type well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC