Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So how will the right wing / military industry complex steal the 2008 election?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:36 AM
Original message
So how will the right wing / military industry complex steal the 2008 election?
The stakes are to big to let "the other side" to have control

Billions have been stolen, how much oil has been taken from Iraq
will never be known, the number of dead is in the hundreds of
thousands, their level of media manipulation is massive (last night's
20/20 as example), and companies like Blackwater and Haliburton have
become above the rule of law.

But now with almost 70% of Americans ready for a change and to throw
the bums out how will the try to keep power?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Look at California. In case you missed it, the first shots in the war have
been fired by the GOP in that state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Bob Herbert - NY Times on this topic today
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/22/opinion/22herbert.html?hp

Right now it’s just a petition drive on its way to becoming a ballot initiative in California. But you should think of it as a tropical depression that could develop into a major storm that blows away the Democrats’ chances of winning the White House next year.

And it could become a constitutional crisis.

It’s panic time in Republican circles. The G.O.P. could go into next year’s election burdened by the twin demons of an unpopular war and an economic downturn. The party that took the White House in 2000 while losing the popular vote figures it may have to do it again.

The Presidential Election Reform Act is the name of a devious proposal that Republican operatives have dreamed up to siphon off 20 or more of the 55 electoral votes that the Democrats would get if, as expected, they win California in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. IMO, by ensuring that either a republican or HRC gets elected to The Presidency.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Do you honestly think there's no difference between the repuke
contenders and HRC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I'm not in that place yet...
...but I can see it from here. Hillary is obviously the right wing's favorite Dem, but I'd still prefer her over any Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Perhaps a little with social programs, but I believe HRC will keep War Profiteering
in business. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Yeah , I agree that she is inlikely to make much of a change
there, but on the other hand, if she's elected, the War Profiteering Prevention Act (a very strong bill) is likely to pass, particularly if we increase dem majorities, and I doubt very much that she'd veto it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. I honestly think that HRC will protect Bush-Co's secrecy - yes, I think they are BOTH corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. Even so, that doesn't make her as bad as the repukes
I'd bet she picks good judiciary noms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
39. Perpetual War and Fascism are no better under a velvet glove and the cloak of "a democrat".
Edited on Sat Sep-22-07 12:22 PM by ShortnFiery
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
40. But it's hard to get enthusiastic about the lesser of two evils (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I would say the same thing too... Use a paid democrat...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I love HRC's Health Care idea .... you have to buy it from insurance companies
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. John Edwards liked her plan--he insinuated that she copied it from her
This thread is getting sidetracked. Focus on fascism, please!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. They won't have to.
A right-wing Dem in office is no great loss to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
8. In Ohio, the 'puke legislators are stalling legislation requested by the Sec'y of State
Edited on Sat Sep-22-07 09:46 AM by TheBorealAvenger
...Jennifer Brunner (a highly regarded Democrat who got most of the newspaper endorsements in last year's election).

edit: Hey, you're from Ohio. Do you remember that headline? I had a pound-fist-on-the-dashboard-when-I-was-listening-to-Ohio-Public-Radio-moment a few weeks ago. Forgot to start a thread. Must have been insane with anger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. They are trying to stop her from looking @ the voting machines
And the Columbus Dispatch says that is a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yeah, that's it!
Was that reported in the Elections / DU forum. I did not look yet. Could start an Ohio thread too for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. They Have A Secret Weapon...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrioticintellect Donating Member (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 10:00 AM
Original message
Damn that's scary
The picture not the fact that she allows Rupert Murdoch to stick a vibrator in her vagina while she misleads the American people. I knew that was happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #12
29. E X A C T A M U N D O ! ! !
That says it all!

TC


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
17. They won't even have to steal it
Edited on Sat Sep-22-07 09:58 AM by Red Zelda
Even with weak GOP candidates, the Dems are doomed.
The media, combined with the never-ending U.S. military fetish and the Calif. electoral votes initiative, will crush the Dems. I hate to say it, but it's inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Bull.
I'll bet the dems with the WH, pick up 4-7 Senate seats and 12-15 House seats, and that the California ev initiative doesn't make it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. I hope you're right
...but I just don't see it. Dumbfuckistan is heading for a Guiliani or Thompson presidency, a presence in Iraq for decades, financial ruin that benefits the richest and ... oh, fuck, I need booze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
18. Quite easily. They control the media. Starting about a month before the elections they will start
24/7 coverage of some mishap our candidate makes (a la Howard Dean.)

The voters will then do the rest - on the "information" they have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrioticintellect Donating Member (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
20. By shifting corporate power (money) to the other side.
Edited on Sat Sep-22-07 10:13 AM by patrioticintellect
If we really want to win, if Americans really want to win, I mean, if we really want to win...

We will get organizations like MoveOn speaking out NOW about the corporate interests and special interests that are funding the leading oresidential candidates in the Democratic Party. OpenSecrets.org has record of how much each area is giving to whomever. After seeing those numbers,Barack and Hillary should scare everybody who are upset with the status quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. yep.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #20
32. It's time to end the cycle of buying the presidency
Edited on Sat Sep-22-07 10:27 AM by notsodumbhillbilly
In order for the people to have a voice in government, we must end the cycle of buying the presidency. For decades, money has determined who will become the presidential nominees for each party, so we shouldn’t be surprised that, once elected, the president gives precedence to those who bought and paid for him over the people who voted for him. It’s time to put a stop to this system.

Vote in your best interest! Ignore the DLCers who tell you Kucinich is not electable. This is nothing more than an attempt to discourage people from voting for him. Better to ignore them altogether with their tactic of using condescension and insults intended to make progressives feel guilty for standing for integrity. We’ve all seen the talking points: “if you vote for (blank), you’re voting for a republican”, “circular firing squad”, “eating our own”, "lesser of two evils", etc.

Election 2008 is the time for us to take back our country. Take it away from the corporatists and warmongers who have perpetuated the current system of buying the presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrioticintellect Donating Member (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. My ECHO
"Election 2008 is the time for us to take back our country. Take it away from the corporatists and warmongers who have perpetuated the current system of buying the presidency."

I'll copy and paste it again to reiterate this point.

"Election 2008 is the time for us to take back our country. Take it away from the corporatists and warmongers who have perpetuated the current system of buying the presidency."

Got it everyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
21. LAST CHANCE: precinct-level, citizen-run, H-A-N-D C-O-U-N-T-E-D P-A-P-E-R B-A-L-L-O-T-S
LIVE FREE or DIE-BOLD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
24. The Dems
need non-stop coverage of Republican sex scandals in the two months before the election (a la Foley in '06). That's the best way to neutralize RW talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
26. I think all that needs to happen is a Clinton nomination and presidency....
Truly... the fun continues! --

BUSH

CLINTON

CLINTON

BUSH

BUSH

CLINTON

CLINTON

looks like a real plan to me. And the DLC will see it happens.


TC

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #26
33. See this thread - "Bush Bets on Clinton Presidency"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrioticintellect Donating Member (490 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #26
37. It was rapper Mos Def ...
...who accurately likened the exchange of power between Bush and Clinton to that of a joint being passed around. He said this on Real Time w/ Bill Maher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
27. Beginning to doubt another false flag
And instead, the Establishment, representing what the world banks/shadow govt's wants, will do what they did via Clinton: put a friendlier face on our "kinder, gentler, machine-gun hand."

Hard to say, cause the totalitarian infrastructure hasn't been established without specific aims and goals. Either way, people, sooner or later, will literally have to fight for freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
28. Why should they bother? They aren't under threat.
They'll still be getting all they want from the politicians who are determined to "Keep America Safe".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
30. It is likely they have already.
We were told before the last elections where the battleground states were. It seems to me that we are playing with marked cards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
31. I suspect there is at least one Democratic candidate
who will do their bidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. You bet there is.
And we know who that is. I actually think any of those inthe DLC would do the bidding.

TC

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
35. A win by Hillary Clinton (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
38. Same way they stole the 2006 election, perhaps. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC