Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: "Americans waiting for Congress, under Democratic control, to show leadership on...Iraq"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 07:14 PM
Original message
NYT: "Americans waiting for Congress, under Democratic control, to show leadership on...Iraq"
Editorial

In Search of a Congress

Article Tools Sponsored By
Published: September 21, 2007

If you were one of the Americans waiting for Congress, under Democratic control, to show leadership on the war in Iraq, the message from the Senate is clear: “Nevermind.” The same goes for those waiting for lawmakers to fix the damage done to civil liberties by six years of President Bush and a rubber-stamp Republican Congress.

The Democrats don’t have, or can’t summon, the political strength to make sure Congress does what it is supposed to do: debate profound issues like these and take a stand. The Republicans are simply not interested in a serious discussion and certainly not a vote on anything beyond Mr. Bush’s increasingly narrow agenda.

On Wednesday, the Senate failed to vote on two major bills. One would have restored basic human rights and constitutional protections to hundreds of foreigners who are in perpetual detention, without charges or trial. The other was the one measure on the conduct of the Iraq war that survived the Democrats’ hasty retreat after last week’s smoke-and-mirrors display by Gen. David Petraeus and President Bush.

There were votes, of course, but not on the bills. They were cloture votes, which require 60 or more Senators to agree to cut off debate, eliminating the possibility of a filibuster, so Senators can vote on the actual law. In both cases, Democrats were four votes short, with six Republicans daring to defy the White House.

more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. While it might not seem fair to lump everyone in this group.
Sen. Feingold has been trying to work a manuvure to reign in the money for this war. But it sure makes you wonder if their is something wrong with these people who only bring themselves to the forefront when they are running an election. I would like to see as much dedication for the peoples causes, as there is for the election causes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. We should list all the votes that the NYTimes have labeled Democratic failures in headlines
Edited on Fri Sep-21-07 07:42 PM by cryingshame
when it was the GOP who sank the various measures and prevented things from passing.

No matter what happens, it is titled "Democratic Failure".

Every single time.

The NYTimes has some fucking nerve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. TRUE DAT! The 6 republicans that dared go against the White House get commendations
but all of them blocking everything are no more mentioned than the sky being blue or the water wet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bush and Congress are both playing for time and praying for a miracle.
They're both looking for some way to avoid blame for a catastrophic war that's been lost.

Bush and Petraeus assure us that "progress is being made" while congress continues to throw money at a problem they won't admit has no chance of being "solved".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jzodda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Give us 60 Senate votes in the next election, problem solved
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-21-07 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Better make that 85 considering yesterday's MoveOn vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC