|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:19 AM Original message |
Dan Rather on MSNBC this morning said it straight out: CBS needed favors from WH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
softwarevotingtrail (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:23 AM Response to Original message |
1. I think that's why Dan filed the lawsuit - to point out the complicity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:28 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yes - he said that again this morning. Bigwigs were mad Abu Ghraib story ran. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zbdent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:29 AM Response to Original message |
3. You know, Rather was an investigative reporter ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 03:13 PM Response to Reply #3 |
21. Well...they can pull that off on a talkshow, but not in a court of law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-22-07 03:47 AM Response to Reply #3 |
25. You can be sure of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cassandra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
4. As I said in the other thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:38 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yes - his once positive coverage became more negative after that comment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:39 AM Response to Original message |
6. I hope he gets a fair judge that is not a "loyal bushie" who serves * over the constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:05 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Judges serving the constitution over the powerful elite are a scarcity these days. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:46 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Yes, bfee saw to this over the last 2 terms. :( Which is why voting machines MUST |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 01:16 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. That's another aspect that many here are still unaware. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 06:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
22. neither will the dems in congress. There were 13 congressional "thefts" last election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
7. Transcript? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 08:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Will probably be up soon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 09:14 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Try Google instead of simply using one word demands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:10 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. It wasn't meant as a demand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:44 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. That used to happen to me alot when I first started posting. I wrote the way I thought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riqster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 12:16 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Seriously, folks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 12:36 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. People here usually get accustomed to writing style after a while. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
springhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 10:16 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Umm........ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rosesaylavee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
10. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
16. God bless Dan Rather for going right at the corrupted heart of corporate media. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 12:16 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. It took him a while to get the evidence he needed - I hope he knows we will be here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-21-07 06:29 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. I sent him a letter yesterday thanking him, care of hdnet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-22-07 02:29 AM Response to Original message |
24. I remember that ruling and the huge Internet campaign that was fought against it, but we lost. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-22-07 04:07 AM Response to Original message |
26. Don't forget the "no-call" legislation as well, which, indirectly, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-22-07 04:12 AM Response to Original message |
27. I'm hoping this ultimately goes well, and that Dan Rather is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Sep-22-07 08:14 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. I fear CBS will settle quickly - Rather should have gone for a billion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:36 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC