Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald urged to indict Burge - Stories like this one make me question my atheism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:05 PM
Original message
Fitzgerald urged to indict Burge - Stories like this one make me question my atheism
http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/567519,burge092007.article

September 20, 2007

BY FRAN SPIELMAN City Hall Reporter

Five Chicago aldermen sent a letter to U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald on Thursday urging him to "investigate, indict and prosecute" former Chicago Police Lt. Jon Burge for torturing African-American criminal suspects.

"We strongly believe that the federal prosecution of Burge and his police helpers is possible and that the statute of limitations is not a bar. Burge and all involved can be prosecuted for perjury, obstruction of justice and for ongoing conspiracy to cover up their torture scheme," the aldermen - Bob Fioretti, (2nd), Pat Dowell (3rd), Billy Ocasio (26th), Ed Smith, (28th) and Helen Shiller (46th) snip

Last year, a $7 million report by special prosecutors concluded that Burge and his underlings tortured criminal suspects for two decades while police brass looked the other way. But the report concluded it’s too late to prosecute because the statute of limitations has long since run out. snip

Locke Bowman, the legal director of the MacArthur Justice Center at Northwestern University’s School of Law who represents one of the torture victims, disclosed that he and attorney Flint Taylor have met with federal prosecutors "on more than one occasion" to discuss Burge and have "good reason to believe" that a federal investigation may be under way by Fitzgerald, who has not hesitated to pursue perjury cases.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
qdemn7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. IMO, the Chicago PD is without a doubt
The most corrupt PD in the US. Thanks to that scumbag Daley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. There you go blaming little Richie Daley
I mean damn, he was only the state's attorney in the 1980s when most of these cases were being prosecuted. He was almost like an innocent bystander.

Oh, wait a minute...

Don

Not the greatest source here maybe (?) but they lay it out pretty much as it was:

http://www.isreview.org/issues/49/torture.shtml


N E W S & R E P O R T S

CHICAGO TORTURE

A $7 million whitewash


By JULIEN BALL


DURING THE two decades between 1973 and 1993, a ring of dozens of white Chicago police officers under former Commander Jon Burge rounded up African-American men on the south side and used such tactics as electroshock to the genitals, suffocation with plastic typewriter bags, and Russian roulette to elicit confessions. The torture scandal reaches into the upper echelons of Chicago politics. Current Mayor Richard M. Daley made his career as a “tough-on-crime” state's attorney in the 1980s based on high-profile convictions-many of which we now know to have been secured through torture. The current state's attorney, Richard Devine, was an assistant under Daley and subsequently went into private practice, where he defended Burge in a civil suit stemming from the torture allegations.

After years of organizing and protesting, a coalition of activists and attorneys finally won their demand for a special prosecutor in 2002 to bring Burge and his minions to justice. In June of this year, they organized pickets and press conferences in front of the courthouse to demand that the special prosecutors release their report, in the face of a tenacious effort by some police officers and prosecutors to squelch it. After all of this-a four-year, $7 million investigation-special prosecutors Edward Egan and Robert Boyle finally unveiled their 292-page report in July. The report is a big disappointment, concluding that the statute of limitations on the Burge torture cases precludes any prosecutions. Burge, who was fired in 1993 for the torture of Andrew Wilson, still resides in Florida on a $3,400 per month pension. For the moment, he and his followers are still safe from prosecution, as Egan and Boyle have let them off the hook.

The special prosecutors said they found evidence of abuse in as many as seventy-five of the 148 cases they investigated and conclude that since Burge engaged in prisoner abuse, it “necessarily follows that a number of those serving under his command recognized that, if their commander could abuse persons with impunity, so could they.” The report states that there is enough evidence to “establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt” that Burge and fellow officers Anthony Maslanka, Michael McDermott, James Lotito, and Ronald Boffo engaged in torture in only three cases-those of Andrew Wilson, Philip Adkins, and Alfonso Pinex.

These findings break no new ground. Michael Goldston, who prepared a report for the Office of Professional Standards (OPS), the Chicago Police Department's own internal investigative body, concluded the following in 1990:

{the} preponderance of evidence is that abuse did occur and that it was systematic...that the type of abuse described was not limited to the usual beatings, but went into such esoteric areas as psychological techniques and planned torture...and that particular command members were aware of the systematic abuse and perpetuated it, either by actively participating in some or failing to take any action to bring it to an end.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-20-07 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. that`s going to be a hard case to get past appeals
getting around the statue of limitations is going to be a hard fight in the appeals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC